IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v35y2024i3d10.1007_s11002-024-09726-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When and why consumers prefer human-free behavior tracking products

Author

Listed:
  • Roshni Raveendhran

    (University of Virginia)

  • Nathanael J. Fast

    (University of Southern California)

Abstract

Despite disliking behavior tracking for marketing, consumers actively adopt technological behavior tracking products. Our research examines the psychological factors driving this adoption and the conditions under which it occurs. We theorize that consumers prefer technological (versus human-based) tracking, because human-free tracking reduces concerns about negative judgment. However, we propose that this preference is weakened, and even reversed, when immediate judgment concerns are less salient than the need for feedback from relevant humans such as when consumers pursue performance (versus personal) goals. Across four preregistered studies (n = 2,601), we found that consumers generally prefer technological (versus human) tracking due to lower negative judgment concerns (Studies 1 and 2A). Consumers’ gender, goal satisfaction, and self-efficacy influenced this effect (Study 2B). However, preference for technological tracking was reversed when consumers pursued performance goals (e.g., training for a public dance competition) versus personal goals (e.g., training to lose weight) (Study 3).

Suggested Citation

  • Roshni Raveendhran & Nathanael J. Fast, 2024. "When and why consumers prefer human-free behavior tracking products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-408, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:35:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09726-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-024-09726-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-024-09726-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-024-09726-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer J. Argo & Darren W. Dahl & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2005. "The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 207-212, September.
    2. Chiara Longoni & Andrea Bonezzi & Carey K Morewedge, 2019. "Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 629-650.
    3. Dahl, Darren W & Manchanda, Rajesh V & Argo, Jennifer J, 2001. "Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 473-481, December.
    4. Jordan Etkin, 2016. "The Hidden Cost of Personal Quantification," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 967-984.
    5. Sean Blair & Neal J. Roese, 2013. "Balancing the Basket: The Role of Shopping Basket Composition in Embarrassment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 676-691.
    6. Romain Cadario & Chiara Longoni & Carey K. Morewedge, 2021. "Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1636-1642, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jana Holthöwer & Jenny Doorn, 2023. "Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 767-784, July.
    2. Park, Yookyung & Yi, Youjae, 2022. "Is a gift on sale “heart-discounted†? Givers’ misprediction on the value of discounted gifts and the influence of service robots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Hess, Nicole J. & Kelley, Corinne M. & Scott, Maura L. & Mende, Martin & Schumann, Jan H., 2020. "Getting Personal in Public!? How Consumers Respond to Public Personalized Advertising in Retail Stores," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 344-361.
    4. Nichols, Bridget Satinover, 2015. "Construction and validation of the in-store privacy preference scale," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 70-78.
    5. Chen, Changdong, 2024. "How consumers respond to service failures caused by algorithmic mistakes: The role of algorithmic interpretability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    7. Kohei Kawaguchi & Kosuke Uetake & Yasutora Watanabe, 2019. "Effectiveness of Product Recommendations Under Time and Crowd Pressures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 253-273, March.
    8. Yang, Yikai & Zheng, Jiehui & Yu, Yining & Qiu, Yiling & Wang, Lei, 2024. "The role of recommendation sources and attribute framing in online product recommendations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Myles Landers, V. & Esmark Jones, Carol L. & Barney, Christian, 2024. "The social influence of employee groups: Understanding the impact of employee groups on customer intentions through intimidation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. He, Yi & Chen, Qimei & Alden, Dana L., 2012. "Consumption in the public eye: The influence of social presence on service experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 302-310.
    11. Valérie Guillard & Eva Delacroix, 2012. ""J'espère que ce commerçant ne me parlera pas !" : l'effet de l'anxiété sociale et du degré d'intimité de la conversation sur l'intention de revenir dans le point de vente," Post-Print hal-01630516, HAL.
    12. Jia Gao & Ying Rong & Xin Tian & Yuliang Yao, 2024. "Improving Convenience or Saving Face? An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Facial Recognition Payment Technology in Retail," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 16-27, March.
    13. Söderlund, Magnus, 2011. "Other customers in the retail environment and their impact on the customer’s evaluations of the retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 174-182.
    14. Barney, Christian & Jones, Carol L. Esmark & Farmer, Adam, 2020. "Approacher be-wear? Increasing shopper approach intentions through employee apparel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 401-416.
    15. Sungwoo Choi & Anna S. Mattila, 2018. "The Effect of Experience Congruity on Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Public Commitment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 124-138, June.
    16. Ni Huang & Lingli Wang & Yili Hong & Lihui Lin & Xunhua Guo & Guoqing Chen, 2024. "When the Clock Strikes: A Multimethod Investigation of On-the-Hour Effects in Online Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 766-782, June.
    17. Fan Alei (Aileen) & Van Hoof Hubert B. & Loyola Sandra Pesantez & Lituma Sebastián Calle & Granda Marlene Jaramillo, 2016. "The impact of other customers and gender on consumer complaint behaviour in the Ecuadorian restaurant setting," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 21-29, May.
    18. Tombs, Alastair G. & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2010. "Social and spatial influence of customers on other customers in the social-servicescape," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 120-131.
    19. Lee, Jeonggyu & Aggarwal, Anubhav & Rafieian, Hoori & Korschun, Daniel, 2020. "Do consumers use tipping to monitor service? Role of power and embarrassment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    20. Erik Hermann & Gizem Yalcin Williams & Stefano Puntoni, 2024. "Deploying artificial intelligence in services to AID vulnerable consumers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1431-1451, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:35:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09726-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.