IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i5p798-d98276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Pros and Cons of Applying Big Data Analytics to Consumers’ Responses in an E-Commerce Context

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Mai Le

    (Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No 1, Shuefu Road, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Yi Liaw

    (Management College, Computer Centre, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No 1, Shuefu Road, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

Abstract

The era of Big Data analytics has begun in most industries within developed countries. This new analytics tool has raised motivation for experts and researchers to study its impacts to business values and challenges. However, studies which help to understand customers’ views and their behavior towards the applications of Big Data analytics are lacking. This research aims to explore and determine the pros and cons of applying Big Data analytics that affects customers’ responses in an e-commerce environment. Data analyses were conducted in a sample of 273 respondents from Vietnam. The findings found that information search, recommendation system, dynamic pricing, and customer services had significant positive effects on customers’ responses. Privacy and security, shopping addiction, and group influences were found to have significant negative effects on customers’ responses. Customers’ responses were measured at intention and behavior stages. Moreover, positive and negative effects simultaneously presented significant effect on customers’ responses. Each dimension of positive and negative factors had different significant impacts on customers’ intention and behavior. Specifically, information search had a significant influence on customers’ intention and improved customers’ behavior. Shopping addiction had a drastic change from intention to behavior compared to group influences and privacy and security. This study contributes to improve understanding of customers’ responses under big data era. This could play an important role to develop sustainable consumers market. E-vendors can rely on Big Data analytics but over usage may have some negative applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Mai Le & Shu-Yi Liaw, 2017. "Effects of Pros and Cons of Applying Big Data Analytics to Consumers’ Responses in an E-Commerce Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:798-:d:98276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/798/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/798/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Kaiser, 1958. "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(3), pages 187-200, September.
    2. Bolton, Lisa E & Warlop, Luk & Alba, Joseph W, 2003. "Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 474-491, March.
    3. Shahriar Akter & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2016. "Big data analytics in E-commerce: a systematic review and agenda for future research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 173-194, May.
    4. Kelly L. Haws & William O. Bearden, 2006. "Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(3), pages 304-311, October.
    5. Tzong-Ru Lee & Jiun-Hung Lin & Liaw Wan-Chin Liao & Ting-Hsiao Yeh, 2013. "Managing the positive and negative characteristics of enterprise microblog to attract user to take action through the perspective of behavioural response," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4/5/6), pages 363-384.
    6. Cristina STOICESCU, 2016. "Big Data, the perfect instrument to study today's consumer behavior," Database Systems Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(3), pages 28-42, January.
    7. Daniel Kahneman & Richard H. Thaler, 2006. "Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 221-234, Winter.
    8. Kamonthip Maichum & Surakiat Parichatnon & Ke-Chung Peng, 2016. "Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Investigate Purchase Intention of Green Products among Thai Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Mircea Răducu TRIFU & Mihaela Laura IVAN, 2014. "Big Data: present and future," Database Systems Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(1), pages 32-41, May.
    10. Erevelles, Sunil & Fukawa, Nobuyuki & Swayne, Linda, 2016. "Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 897-904.
    11. Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C., 2000. "Repetitive Advertising and the Consumer," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(6), pages 39-48, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Navodya Denuwara & Juha Maijala & Marko Hakovirta, 2021. "The impact of unmanned stores' business models on sustainability," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Michaelidou, Nina & Micevski, Milena, 2019. "Consumers' ethical perceptions of social media analytics practices: Risks, benefits and potential outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 576-586.
    3. Jean-Luc Pradel Mathurin Augustin & Shu-Yi Liaw, 2020. "Does Gender, Age and Usage Matter in Big Data’s Perception Applied in Online Tourism?," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 1-1, December.
    4. Shobhana Chandra & Sanjeev Verma, 2023. "Big Data and Sustainable Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda," Vision, , vol. 27(1), pages 11-23, February.
    5. Reihaneh Hajishirzi & Carlos J. Costa & Manuela Aparicio, 2022. "Boosting Sustainability through Digital Transformation’s Domains and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Chia-Nan Wang & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thi-Thu-Hong Le, 2020. "Supporting Better Decision-Making: A Combined Grey Model and Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficiency Evaluation in E-Commerce Marketplaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Biresh Kumar & Sharmistha Roy & Anurag Sinha & Celestine Iwendi & Ľubomíra Strážovská, 2022. "E-Commerce Website Usability Analysis Using the Association Rule Mining and Machine Learning Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Zhuang Weiqing & Wang Morgan C. & Nakamoto Ichiro & Jiang Ming, 2021. "Big Data Analytics in E-commerce for the U.S. and China Through Literature Reviewing," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 16-44, February.
    9. Xuan-Lam Duong & Shu-Yi Liaw, 2022. "Online Interpersonal Relationships and Data Ownership Awareness Mediate the Relationship between Perceived Benefits and Problematic Internet Shopping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Industry-4.0-Enabled Digital Transformation: Prospects, Instruments, Challenges, and Implications for Business Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-33, May.
    11. Paulo Rita & Ricardo F. Ramos, 2022. "Global Research Trends in Consumer Behavior and Sustainability in E-Commerce: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Vijay Victor & Chin Lay Gan & Sebastian Kot, 2019. "Electronic commerce for home-based businesses in emerging and developed economy," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(4), pages 463-483, December.
    13. Michaelidou, Nina & Micevski, Milena & Cadogan, John W., 2021. "Users’ ethical perceptions of social media research: Conceptualisation and measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 684-694.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu-Yi Liaw & Thi Mai Le, 2017. "Comparing Mediation Effect of Functional and Emotional Value in the Relationship between Pros of Applying Big Data," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 66-75, August.
    2. Vijay Victor & Jose Joy Thoppan & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Fekete Farkas Maria, 2018. "Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior and Prospective Purchase Decisions in a Dynamic Pricing Environment—An Exploratory Factor Analysis Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    4. Kim, Jungkeun, 2019. "The impact of different price promotions on customer retention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 95-102.
    5. Fennell, Patrick B. & Coleman, Joshua T. & Kuo, Andrew, 2020. "The moderating role of donation quantifiers on price fairness judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 464-473.
    6. Leogrande, Angelo, 2021. "The Destruction of Price-Representativeness," MPRA Paper 111239, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Rabbanee, Fazlul K. & Roy, Rajat & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Contextual differences in the moderating effects of price consciousness and social desirability in pay-what-you-want (PWYW) pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 13-25.
    8. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2014. "How social comparison influences reference price formation in a service context," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 168-180.
    9. Amanda Belarmino & Carola Raab & Tevfik Demirciftci, 2020. "The impact of resort fees on perceived fairness and destination brand image: an exploratory study," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 129-137, April.
    10. Boccali, Filippo & Mariani, Marcello M. & Visani, Franco & Mora-Cruz, Alexandra, 2022. "Innovative value-based price assessment in data-rich environments: Leveraging online review analytics through Data Envelopment Analysis to empower managers and entrepreneurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Sayanti SHAW, 2018. "Role Of Need For Closure On Perceived Price Fairness," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 797-806, November.
    12. Konuk, Faruk Anıl, 2019. "The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 103-110.
    13. Li, Shaobo (Kevin) & Kokkoris, Michail D. & Savani, Krishna, 2020. "Does everyone have the potential to achieve their ideal body weight? Lay theories about body weight and support for price discrimination policies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 129-142.
    14. Ham, Sung H. & He, Chuan & Zhang, Dan, 2022. "The promise and peril of dynamic targeted pricing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1150-1165.
    15. Sojin Jung & Hyeon Jeong Cho & Byoungho Ellie Jin, 2020. "Does effective cost transparency increase price fairness? An analysis of apparel brand strategies," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 495-507, September.
    16. Golovacheva, K., 2015. "Consumer response to unit price increase: The role of pricing tactics and consumer knowledge," Working Papers 6421, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    17. White, Allyn & Breazeale, Michael & Collier, Joel E., 2012. "The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Customer Responses to Retailer SST Push Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 250-261.
    18. Barna Bakó & András Kálecz-Simon, 2017. "Nothing so Certain as your Anchors? A Consumer Bias that may Lower Prices and Prevent Cartels," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 273-282, September.
    19. Jingnan Zhang & Shichun Xu & Zhengxia He & Chengze Li & Xiaona Meng, 2022. "Factors Influencing Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles under a Subsidy Deduction: From Different City-Level Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Nathan Chubaka Mushagalusa & Eddy Balemba Kanyurhi & Deogratias Bugandwa Mungu Akonkwa & Patrick Murhula Cubaka, 2022. "Measuring price fairness and its impact on consumers’ trust and switching intentions in microfinance institutions," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 111-135, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:798-:d:98276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.