IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i5p2474-2489d35628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Exergoeconomic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor via Organic Rankine Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Naser Shokati

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Daneshgah Street, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Farzad Mohammadkhani

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Daneshgah Street, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Mortaza Yari

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Daneshgah Street, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Daneshgah Street, Ardabil 5619911367, Iran)

  • Seyed M. S. Mahmoudi

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Daneshgah Street, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Marc A. Rosen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada)

Abstract

A comparative exergoeconomic analysis is reported for waste heat recovery from a gas turbine-modular helium reactor (GT-MHR) using various configurations of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for generating electricity. The ORC configurations studied are: a simple organic Rankine cycle (SORC), an ORC with an internal heat exchanger (HORC) and a regenerative organic Rankine cycle (RORC). Exergoeconomic analyses are performed with the specific exergy costing (SPECO) method. First, energy and exergy analyses are applied to the combined cycles. Then, a cost-balance, as well as auxiliary equations are developed for the components to determine the exergoeconomic parameters for the combined cycles and their components. The three combined cycles are compared considering the same operating conditions for the GT-MHR cycle, and a parametric study is done to reveal the effects on the exergoeconomic performance of the combined cycles of various significant parameters, e.g., turbine inlet and evaporator temperatures and compressor pressure ratio. The results show that the GT-MHR/RORC has the lowest unit cost of electricity generated by the ORC turbine. This value is highest for the GT-MHR/HORC. Furthermore, the GT-MHR/RORC has the highest and the GT-MHR/HORC has the lowest exergy destruction cost rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Naser Shokati & Farzad Mohammadkhani & Mortaza Yari & Seyed M. S. Mahmoudi & Marc A. Rosen, 2014. "A Comparative Exergoeconomic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor via Organic Rankine Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:5:p:2474-2489:d:35628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/5/2474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/5/2474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    2. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    3. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2010. "Exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of a cogeneration plant system using Multimodal Genetic Algorithm (MGA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5161-5172.
    4. Tsatsaronis, George, 2007. "Definitions and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 249-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    2. Asgari, Armin & Jannatkhah, Javad & Yari, Mortaza & Najafi, Bahman, 2023. "Multi-aspect assessment and multi-objective optimization of sustainable power, heating, and cooling tri-generation system driven by experimentally-produced biodiesels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    3. Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Amirreza Javaherian & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Mehri Akbari Kordlar & Marc A. Rosen, 2023. "Proposal and Comprehensive Analysis of a Novel Combined Plant with Gas Turbine and Organic Flash Cycles: An Application of Multi-Objective Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-40, September.
    4. Torres, Erick & Rodriguez-Ortiz, Leandro A. & Zalazar, Daniela & Echegaray, Marcelo & Rodriguez, Rosa & Zhang, Huili & Mazza, Germán, 2020. "4-E (environmental, economic, energetic and exergetic) analysis of slow pyrolysis of lignocellulosic waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 296-307.
    5. Bahlouli, K. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Sarabchi, N., 2015. "Parametric investigation and thermo-economic multi-objective optimization of an ammonia–water power/cooling cycle coupled with an HCCI (homogeneous charge compression ignition) engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 672-684.
    6. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    7. Khaljani, M. & Saray, R. Khoshbakhti & Bahlouli, K., 2016. "Evaluation of a combined cycle based on an HCCI (Homogenous Charge Compression Ignition) engine heat recovery employing two organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 748-760.
    8. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Konstantinos G. Aravossis & Miltiadis Zamparas & Alexandros Mitsikas, 2019. "Evaluating Circular Economy under a Multi-Parametric Approach: A Technological Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Shakibi, Hamid & Shokri, Afshar & Assareh, Ehsanolah & Yari, Mortaza & Lee, Moonyong, 2023. "Using machine learning approaches to model and optimize a combined solar/natural gas-based power and freshwater cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    10. Zare, A. Darabadi & Saray, R. Khoshbakhti & Mirmasoumi, S. & Bahlouli, K., 2019. "Optimization strategies for mixing ratio of biogas and natural gas co-firing in a cogeneration of heat and power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 635-644.
    11. Chen, Heng & Alzahrani, Huda A. & Amin, Mohammed A. & Sun, Minghui, 2023. "Towards sustainable development through the design, multi-aspect analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a novel solar-based multi-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    12. Dominika Matuszewska & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Crivellari, Anna & Cozzani, Valerio & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of novel methanol synthesis processes driven by offshore renewable energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    2. Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "A comparative study on the ammonia–water based bottoming power cycles: The exergoeconomic viewpoint," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 425-434.
    3. Gürtürk, Mert & Oztop, Hakan F. & Hepbasli, Arif, 2015. "Comparison of exergoeconomic analysis of two different perlite expansion furnaces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 589-598.
    4. Ligang Wang & Yongping Yang & Changqing Dong & Zhiping Yang & Gang Xu & Lingnan Wu, 2012. "Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a Modern Ultra-Supercritical Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    6. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    7. Lara, Yolanda & Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Morosuk, Tatiana & Boyano, Alicia & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "An exergy-based study on the relationship between costs and environmental impacts in power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 920-928.
    8. Shahin Shamsi & Mohammad R. Omidkhah, 2012. "Optimization of Steam Pressure Levels in a Total Site Using a Thermoeconomic Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    11. Silveira, Jose Luz & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Villela, Iraides Aparecida de Castro & Miro, Laura Siso, 2012. "Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2894-2906.
    12. Coban, Kahraman & Şöhret, Yasin & Colpan, C. Ozgur & Karakoç, T. Hikmet, 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a small-scale turbojet fuelled with biodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P2), pages 1358-1367.
    13. Aygun, Hakan & Turan, Onder, 2021. "Exergo-economic analysis of off-design a target drone engine for reconnaissance mission flight," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    15. Min-Ju Jeon, 2022. "Experimental Analysis of the R744/R404A Cascade Refrigeration System with Internal Heat Exchanger. Part 2: Exergy Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Akbulut, Ugur & Utlu, Zafer & Kincay, Olcay, 2016. "Exergy, exergoenvironmental and exergoeconomic evaluation of a heat pump-integrated wall heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 502-522.
    17. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    18. Karaali, Rabi & Öztürk, İlhan Tekin, 2015. "Thermoeconomic optimization of gas turbine cogeneration plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 474-485.
    19. Pirmohamadi, Alireza & Ghazi, Mehrangiz & Nikian, Mohammad, 2019. "Optimal design of cogeneration systems in total site using exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1291-1302.
    20. Wei, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Bingjian & Wu, Shengyuan & Chen, Qinglin & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 424-433.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:5:p:2474-2489:d:35628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.