IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i6p1499-d335551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Matuszewska

    (AGH University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza Ave., 30-059 Cracow, Poland)

  • Piotr Olczak

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 7A Wybickiego St., 31-261 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

Power conversion systems based on the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) have been identified as a potential technology especially in converting low-grade renewable sources or waste heat. However, it is necessary to improve efficiency of ORC systems. This paper focuses on use of low geothermal resources (for temperature range of 80–128 °C and mass flow 100 kg/s) by using modified ORC. A modification of conventional binary power plant is conducted by combining gas turbines to increase quality of steam from a geothermal well. An analysis has been conducted for three different working fluids: R245fa, R1233zd(E) and R600. The paper discusses the impact of parameter changes not only on system efficiency but on other performance indicators. The results were compared with a conventional geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). Increasing of geothermal steam quality by supplying exhaust gas from a gas turbine to the installation has a positive effect on the system efficiency and power. The highest efficiency of the modified ORC system has been obtained for R1233zd(E) as a working fluid and it reaches values from 12.21% to 19.20% (depending on the temperature of the geothermal brine). In comparison, an ORC system without gas turbine support reaches values from 9.43% to 17.54%.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Matuszewska & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1499-:d:335551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Wei & Meinel, Dominik & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2014. "Investigation of hydrofluoroolefins as potential working fluids in organic Rankine cycle for geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 106-116.
    2. Tempesti, Duccio & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Fiaschi, Daniele, 2012. "Thermodynamic analysis of two micro CHP systems operating with geothermal and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 609-617.
    3. Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Gao, Lin & Ma, Shaolin, 2009. "A new combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2780-2788.
    4. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    5. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Nemati, Arash & ghavimi, Alireza & Yari, Mortaza, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 791-802.
    6. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2015. "Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    8. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Kaindl, Johannes & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 946-963.
    9. Carcasci, Carlo & Ferraro, Riccardo & Miliotti, Edoardo, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of an organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery from gas turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 91-100.
    10. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    11. Nami, Hossein & Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Agromayor, Roberto & Riboldi, Luca & Nord, Lars O., 2018. "Gas turbine exhaust gas heat recovery by organic Rankine cycles (ORC) for offshore combined heat and power applications - Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1060-1071.
    12. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    13. Borsukiewicz-Gozdur, Aleksandra & Nowak, Władysław, 2007. "Comparative analysis of natural and synthetic refrigerants in application to low temperature Clausius–Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 344-352.
    14. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    15. Bruhn, Matthias, 2002. "Hybrid geothermal–fossil electricity generation from low enthalpy geothermal resources: geothermal feedwater preheating in conventional power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 329-346.
    16. Zhai, H. & Dai, Y.J. & Wu, J.Y. & Wang, R.Z., 2009. "Energy and exergy analyses on a novel hybrid solar heating, cooling and power generation system for remote areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1395-1404, September.
    17. Madhawa Hettiarachchi, H.D. & Golubovic, Mihajlo & Worek, William M. & Ikegami, Yasuyuki, 2007. "Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1698-1706.
    18. Fernández, F.J. & Prieto, M.M. & Suárez, I., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of high-temperature regenerative organic Rankine cycles using siloxanes as working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5239-5249.
    19. Ruiqi Wang & Long Jiang & Zhiwei Ma & Abigail Gonzalez-Diaz & Yaodong Wang & Anthony Paul Roskilly, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle Systems for Solar Energy Utilisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Clemente, Stefano & Micheli, Diego & Reini, Mauro & Taccani, Rodolfo, 2013. "Bottoming organic Rankine cycle for a small scale gas turbine: A comparison of different solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 355-364.
    21. Di Battista, D. & Mauriello, M. & Cipollone, R., 2015. "Waste heat recovery of an ORC-based power unit in a turbocharged diesel engine propelling a light duty vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 109-120.
    22. Naser Shokati & Farzad Mohammadkhani & Mortaza Yari & Seyed M. S. Mahmoudi & Marc A. Rosen, 2014. "A Comparative Exergoeconomic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor via Organic Rankine Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, April.
    23. Hung, T.C. & Shai, T.Y. & Wang, S.K., 1997. "A review of organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 661-667.
    24. Costante M. Invernizzi & Abubakr Ayub & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora, 2019. "Pure and Hydrocarbon Binary Mixtures as Possible Alternatives Working Fluids to the Usual Organic Rankine Cycles Biomass Conversion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    25. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariusz Niekurzak & Jerzy Mikulik, 2021. "Modeling of Energy Consumption and Reduction of Pollutant Emissions in a Walking Beam Furnace Using the Expert Method—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ladislao Eduardo Méndez-Cruz & Miguel Ángel Gutiérrez-Limón & Helen Lugo-Méndez & Raúl Lugo-Leyte & Teresa Lopez-Arenas & Mauricio Sales-Cruz, 2022. "Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis of the Performance of an Organic Rankine Cycle Using Different Working Fluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Semmari, Hamza & Bouaicha, Foued & Aberkane, Sofiane & Filali, Abdelkader & Blessent, Daniela & Badache, Messaoud, 2024. "Geological context and thermo-economic study of an indirect heat ORC geothermal power plant for the northeast region of Algeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    4. Ana Fernández-Guillamón & Ángel Molina-García & Francisco Vera-García & José A. Almendros-Ibáñez, 2021. "Organic Rankine Cycle Optimization Performance Analysis Based on Super-Heater Pressure: Comparison of Working Fluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Ryszard Bartnik & Zbigniew Buryn & Anna Hnydiuk-Stefan & Marcin Szega & Tomasz Popławski, 2020. "Power and Frequency Control in the National Power System of the 370 MW Coal Fired Unit Superstructured with a Gas Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, May.
    6. Maria Alessandra Ancona & Michele Bianchi & Lisa Branchini & Andrea De Pascale & Francesco Melino & Antonio Peretto & Noemi Torricelli, 2021. "Systematic Comparison of ORC and s-CO 2 Combined Heat and Power Plants for Energy Harvesting in Industrial Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Vladimir Kindra & Igor Maksimov & Ivan Komarov & Cheng Xu & Tuantuan Xin, 2023. "Feasibility Study of Scheme and Regenerator Parameters for Trinary Power Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Dominika Matuszewska & Marta Kuta & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Mobilized Thermal Energy Storage System Using Geothermal Source in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tempesti, Duccio & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Fiaschi, Daniele, 2012. "Thermodynamic analysis of two micro CHP systems operating with geothermal and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 609-617.
    2. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    3. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    4. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Karvountzis-Kontakiotis & Apostolos Pesyridis & Muhammad Usman, 2018. "Expander Technologies for Automotive Engine Organic Rankine Cycle Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-36, July.
    5. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    6. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    7. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    8. Magdalena Santos-Rodriguez, M. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A stochastic optimization approach for the design of organic fluid mixtures for low-temperature heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 145-159.
    9. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    10. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Chaitanya Prasad, G.S. & Suresh Kumar, C. & Srinivasa Murthy, S. & Venkatarathnam, G., 2015. "Performance of an organic Rankine cycle with multicomponent mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 690-696.
    12. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    13. Habka, Muhsen & Ajib, Salman, 2014. "Investigation of novel, hybrid, geothermal-energized cogeneration plants based on organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 212-222.
    14. Uusitalo, Antti & Honkatukia, Juha & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu, 2017. "Evaluation of a small-scale waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 146-158.
    15. Scardigno, Domenico & Fanelli, Emanuele & Viggiano, Annarita & Braccio, Giacobbe & Magi, Vinicio, 2015. "A genetic optimization of a hybrid organic Rankine plant for solar and low-grade energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 807-815.
    16. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    17. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Schampheleire, S. & De Paepe, M., 2013. "Part load based thermo-economic optimization of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applied to a combined heat and power (CHP) system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 871-881.
    18. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    19. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    20. Steven Lecompte & Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Christos N. Markides & Marija Lazova & Alihan Kaya & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2017. "Case Study of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Waste Heat Recovery from an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1499-:d:335551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.