IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v187y2019ics0360544219316317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of novel methanol synthesis processes driven by offshore renewable energies

Author

Listed:
  • Crivellari, Anna
  • Cozzani, Valerio
  • Dincer, Ibrahim

Abstract

In the current context of global energy transition, the coupling of methanol production with offshore oil & gas operations appears to be a promising option to share infrastructures and convert renewable energy into valuable fuel. However, renewable methanol synthesis has not yet reached the commercial stage. Moreover, there is no evidence on studies integrating offshore multiple resources into methanol process. The novelty of this paper is a performance analysis of emerging routes for methanol production driven by offshore wind-solar energies through exergy and exergoeconomic techniques. Two production schemes (catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide and direct radical oxidation of methane) are properly designed to produce a fixed methanol rate driven by offshore wind farm and solar-thermal plants at a given oil & gas rig. The results demonstrate that carbon dioxide-based route shows the lowest exergy destruction rate (66 MW) and total cost rate (1000 $/h) compared to other option. In conjunction with this, the methane-based route gives a satisfactory exergy efficiency of 87% against a mere 2% of other pathway, as well as higher potential to increase cost savings due to lower exergoeconomic factor. Furthermore, influences of varying some key variables on the proposed parameters of the two options are investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Crivellari, Anna & Cozzani, Valerio & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of novel methanol synthesis processes driven by offshore renewable energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:187:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219316317
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219316317
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    2. Zakaria, Z. & Kamarudin, S.K., 2016. "Direct conversion technologies of methane to methanol: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 250-261.
    3. Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Schöneberger, Jan C. & Boulamanti, Aikaterini & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2016. "Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 718-732.
    4. Matzen, Michael & Alhajji, Mahdi & Demirel, Yaşar, 2015. "Chemical storage of wind energy by renewable methanol production: Feasibility analysis using a multi-criteria decision matrix," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 343-353.
    5. El-Emam, Rami Salah & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2014. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant with energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 154-163.
    6. Naser Shokati & Farzad Mohammadkhani & Mortaza Yari & Seyed M. S. Mahmoudi & Marc A. Rosen, 2014. "A Comparative Exergoeconomic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor via Organic Rankine Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Ganesh, Ibram, 2014. "Conversion of carbon dioxide into methanol – a potential liquid fuel: Fundamental challenges and opportunities (a review)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 221-257.
    8. Varone, Alberto & Ferrari, Michele, 2015. "Power to liquid and power to gas: An option for the German Energiewende," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 207-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tola, Vittorio & Lonis, Francesco, 2021. "Low CO2 emissions chemically recuperated gas turbines fed by renewable methanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Kotowicz, J. & Brzęczek, M., 2021. "Methods to increase the efficiency of production and purification installations of renewable methanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 568-583.
    3. Gao, Ruxing & Wang, Lei & Zhang, Leiyu & Zhang, Chundong & Jun, Ki-Won & Kim, Seok Ki & Zhao, Tiansheng & Wan, Hui & Guan, Guofeng & Zhu, Yuezhao, 2023. "A multi-criteria sustainability assessment and decision-making framework for DME synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Wiranarongkorn, Kunlanan & Im-orb, Karittha & Panpranot, Joongjai & Maréchal, François & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2021. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of sustainable furfural production via reactive distillation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Nakyai, Teeranun & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai & Saebea, Dang, 2020. "Comparative exergoeconomic analysis of indirect and direct bio-dimethyl ether syntheses based on air-steam biomass gasification with CO2 utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Zhang, Yuan & Liang, Tianyang & Yang, Ke, 2022. "An integrated energy storage system consisting of Compressed Carbon dioxide energy storage and Organic Rankine Cycle: Exergoeconomic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Atalay, Halil & Aslan, Volkan, 2023. "Advanced exergoeconomic and exergy performance assessments of a wind and solar energy powered hybrid dryer," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 218-230.
    8. Konstantin Osintsev & Sergei Aliukov & Yuri Prikhodko, 2021. "A Case study of Exergy Losses of a Ground Heat Pump and Photovoltaic Cells System and Their Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Amaya Martínez-Gracia & Sergio Usón & Mª Teresa Pintanel & Javier Uche & Ángel A. Bayod-Rújula & Alejandro Del Amo, 2021. "Exergy Assessment and Thermo-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Solar Systems with Seasonal Storage and Heat Pump Coupling in the Social Housing Sector in Zaragoza," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-32, February.
    10. Kotowicz, Janusz & Węcel, Daniel & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2021. "Analysis of the work of a “renewable” methanol production installation based ON H2 from electrolysis and CO2 from power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brynolf, Selma & Taljegard, Maria & Grahn, Maria & Hansson, Julia, 2018. "Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1887-1905.
    2. Rahmat, Yoga & Maier, Simon & Moser, Francisco & Raab, Moritz & Hoffmann, Christian & Repke, Jens-Uwe & Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe, 2023. "Techno-economic and exergy analysis of e-methanol production under fixed operating conditions in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    3. Bahlouli, K. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Sarabchi, N., 2015. "Parametric investigation and thermo-economic multi-objective optimization of an ammonia–water power/cooling cycle coupled with an HCCI (homogeneous charge compression ignition) engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 672-684.
    4. Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Lozano-Medina, A. & Marcos, J.D., 2017. "A critical review of definitions for exergetic efficiency in reverse osmosis desalination plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 752-760.
    5. Runge, Philipp & Sölch, Christian & Albert, Jakob & Wasserscheid, Peter & Zöttl, Gregor & Grimm, Veronika, 2019. "Economic comparison of different electric fuels for energy scenarios in 2035," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1078-1093.
    6. Zain, Munirah Md & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2018. "An overview on conversion technologies to produce value added products from CH4 and CO2 as major biogas constituents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 56-63.
    7. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    8. Adnan, Muflih A. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of power-to-methanol synthesis pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda & Brigagão, George Victor & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Carbon dioxide management via exergy-based sustainability assessment: Carbon Capture and Storage versus conversion to methanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 720-732.
    10. Kotowicz, Janusz & Węcel, Daniel & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2021. "Analysis of the work of a “renewable” methanol production installation based ON H2 from electrolysis and CO2 from power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Samuel Simon Araya & Vincenzo Liso & Xiaoti Cui & Na Li & Jimin Zhu & Simon Lennart Sahlin & Søren Højgaard Jensen & Mads Pagh Nielsen & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2020. "A Review of The Methanol Economy: The Fuel Cell Route," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    12. Janghorban Esfahani, Iman & Yoo, Changkyoo, 2014. "A highly efficient combined multi-effect evaporation-absorption heat pump and vapor-compression refrigeration part 2: Thermoeconomic and flexibility analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 327-337.
    13. Al-Kalbani, Haitham & Xuan, Jin & García, Susana & Wang, Huizhi, 2016. "Comparative energetic assessment of methanol production from CO2: Chemical versus electrochemical process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Ma, Qian & Chang, Yuan & Yuan, Bo & Song, Zhaozheng & Xue, Jinjun & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "Utilizing carbon dioxide from refinery flue gas for methanol production: System design and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    16. Campion, Nicolas & Nami, Hossein & Swisher, Philip R. & Vang Hendriksen, Peter & Münster, Marie, 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of green ammonia production with different wind and solar potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Chitgar, Nazanin & Moghimi, Mahdi, 2020. "Design and evaluation of a novel multi-generation system based on SOFC-GT for electricity, fresh water and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    18. González-Aparicio, I. & Kapetaki, Z. & Tzimas, E., 2018. "Wind energy and carbon dioxide utilisation as an alternative business model for energy producers: A case study in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 216-227.
    19. Chauvy, Remi & Meunier, Nicolas & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2019. "Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 662-680.
    20. Kotowicz, J. & Brzęczek, M., 2021. "Methods to increase the efficiency of production and purification installations of renewable methanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 568-583.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:187:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219316317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.