IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8947-d1499682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Application of an Employee Moral Quotient (MQ) Evaluation Index System for Chinese Petroleum Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Junzhu Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    School of Economics, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong 643000, China)

  • Xiaozhong Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Hu Li

    (School of Economics, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong 643000, China)

Abstract

Recognizing the critical role of oil and gas resources as strategic assets and acknowledging the increasing emphasis on green development and social responsibility driven by international energy agreements and the “dual carbon” strategy, this study addresses the urgent need for a robust employee evaluation framework within China’s petroleum sector. While existing systems often prioritize competence-based indicators, they frequently overlook the crucial aspect of employee Moral Quotient (MQ). This research focuses on developing and validating a holistic, scientifically grounded, multi-dimensional, and dynamic MQ evaluation index system tailored specifically for Chinese petroleum enterprises. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, integrating a comprehensive literature review, semi-structured interviews with industry experts, and robust quantitative techniques, including the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the entropy weight method. A two-round Delphi study, involving 18 experts from six provinces across China, ensured broad representation and facilitated the construction of the evaluation index system and the determination of indicator weights. The Delphi process achieved a high degree of expert consensus, evidenced by a 100% questionnaire response rate in both rounds, expert authority coefficients of 0.851 and 0.879, respectively, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance of 0.243 and 0.247 ( p < 0.01), respectively, demonstrating strong reliability and scientific validity. The resulting MQ evaluation index system comprises eight first-level indicators and thirty-three s-level indicators, encompassing key dimensions of employee morality relevant to the petroleum industry. This comprehensive system provides a robust and objective tool for employee selection, training, performance evaluation, and career development within Chinese petroleum enterprises, supporting informed decision-making in human resource management and fostering a culture of ethical conduct and sustainable development. Furthermore, the developed framework offers valuable insights and serves as a potential model for petroleum enterprises and other resource-intensive industries globally seeking to integrate MQ assessment into their human capital management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Junzhu Xu & Xiaozhong Yu & Hu Li, 2024. "Development and Application of an Employee Moral Quotient (MQ) Evaluation Index System for Chinese Petroleum Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8947-:d:1499682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tung-Ju Wu & Lian-Yi Wang & Jia-Ying Gao & An-Pin Wei, 2020. "Social Support and Well-Being of Chinese Special Education Teachers—An Emotional Labor Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Lennerts, Silke & Schulze, Anja & Tomczak, Torsten, 2020. "The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 121-134.
    3. Byung-Jik Kim & Min-Jik Kim & Tae-Hyun Kim, 2021. "“The Power of Ethical Leadership”: The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Creativity, the Mediating Function of Psychological Safety, and the Moderating Role of Ethical Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Gema Albort-Morant & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Antonio Leal-Rodríguez & Gabriele Giorgi, 2020. "How Does Positive Work-Related Stress Affect the Degree of Innovation Development?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Tung-Ju Wu & Jia-Ying Gao & Lian-Yi Wang & Kuo-Shu Yuan, 2020. "Exploring Links between Polychronicity and Job Performance from the Person–Environment Fit Perspective—The Mediating Role of Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Linlin & Li, Wenzhuo & Addis, Amsalu K. & Di Ye, Di & Dong, Yashi, 2022. "Impacts of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employees’ Mental Fatigue: Employees’ Ethical Perspective," MPRA Paper 114316, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Chang-Lan Xia & An-Pin Wei & Yu-Ting Huang, 2022. "The COVID-19 Lockdown and Mental Wellbeing of Females in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Chang-Lan Xia & Tung-Ju Wu & An-Pin Wei & Pei-Guan Wu, 2020. "Are Chinese Entrepreneurs Happier than Employees? Evidence Based on a National Workforce Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Barba-Aragón, María Isabel & Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel, 2020. "HRM and radical innovation: A dual approach with exploration as a mediator," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 791-803.
    5. Xiaoping Chen & Hongming Xie & Huanhuai Zhou, 2024. "Incremental versus Radical Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Istipliler, Baris & Bort, Suleika & Woywode, Michael, 2023. "Flowers of adversity: Institutional constraints and innovative SMEs in transition economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Bernardo Gala-Velásquez & Américo Hurtado-Palomino & Angela Y. Arredondo-Salas, 2023. "Organisational Flexibility and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Support," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 219-234, June.
    8. Zhu, Xiumei & Li, Yue, 2023. "The use of data-driven insight in ambidextrous digital transformation: How do resource orchestration, organizational strategic decision-making, and organizational agility matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Jiang, Shuiquan & Yang, Jie & Yu, Mingchuan & Lin, Han & Li, Chao & Doty, Harold, 2022. "Strategic conformity, organizational learning ambidexterity, and corporate innovation performance: An inverted U-shaped curve?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 424-433.
    10. Ariana Chang & Tian-Shyug Lee & Hsiu-Mei Lee & Jing Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Responsible Leadership on Strategic Agility: Cases from the Taiwan Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Martin Sanchez-Gomez & Gabriele Giorgi & Georgia Libera Finstad & Federico Alessio & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Giulio Arcangeli & Nicola Mucci, 2021. "Economic Stress at Work: Its Impact over Absenteeism and Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Tung-Ju Wu & Lian-Yi Wang & Jia-Ying Gao & An-Pin Wei, 2020. "Social Support and Well-Being of Chinese Special Education Teachers—An Emotional Labor Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Byung‐Jik Kim & Nayoung Jeon & Harim Sohn & Nahee Lee & Min‐Jik Kim, 2024. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on employee burnout: The crucial role of work overload," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4345-4360, September.
    14. Magdalena Pichlak, 2021. "The Drivers of Technological Eco-Innovation—Dynamic Capabilities and Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Wei‐Jr Juo & Chao‐Hung Wang, 2022. "Does green innovation mediate the relationship between green relational view and competitive advantage?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2456-2468, July.
    16. Jiang, Zihao & Liu, Zhiying, 2022. "Policies and exploitative and exploratory innovations of the wind power industry in China: The role of technological path dependence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Dumitrescu Liliana & Deselnicu Dana-Corina & Lacuta Valentina Diana & Danciu Bogdan-Vasile, 2023. "Satisfaction and Performance of Romanian Employees Working in the Accountancy and Human Resources Fields," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 2119-2131, July.
    18. Sanjoy Kumar Roy & Md. Rahat Khan & Nazrul Islam Shanto, 2023. "Bankers' job stress, job performance, and job commitment trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 19(3), pages 203-228.
    19. Annamaria Di Fabio & Mirko Duradoni, 2020. "Humor Styles as New Resources in a Primary Preventive Perspective: Reducing Resistance to Change for Negotiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Norah Saleh Binghashayan & Kee Jiar Yeo & Azlina Mohd Kosnin, 2022. "Relationship between Student’s Self-Determination, Parental Involvement, Special Education Teachers’ Support, and College and Career Readiness among Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities in Ri," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8947-:d:1499682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.