IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6431-d1444152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leader Fault Tolerance and Employees’ Green Silent Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Ownership and Moral Disengagement

Author

Listed:
  • Shihong Cao

    (School of Marxism, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Hong Zhang

    (School of Philosophy, History and Culture, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China)

  • Qi Chen

    (Ideological and Political Department, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan 030008, China)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the negative impact of leader fault tolerance and focuses on the green silent behavior of employees who remain silent on green production or environmental issues. Data from 386 valid questionnaires were analyzed through SPSS 27.0, AMOS 28 software, and the PROCESS program to explore the impact of leader fault tolerance on employees’ green silent behavior. Based on the reliability and validity analysis, correlation analysis, and validation factor analysis, the study concluded through hierarchical regression analysis that the regression coefficient values of leader fault tolerance on green silent behavior, moral disengagement, and psychological ownership were 0.362, 0.376, and 0.408, respectively, and their p-values were less than 0.01, which verified that leader fault tolerance had a significant positive effect on green silent behavior, moral disengagement, and psychological ownership. After the mediation effect test, the 95% CI of psychological ownership and moral disengagement were [0.057, 0.156] and [0.059, 0.141], respectively, and they did not include 0, which verified that psychological ownership and moral disengagement had a significant indirect effect on leader fault tolerance and employees’ green silent behavior and played a mediating role between them. Based on this, leaders should take appropriate measures to avoid employees’ green silent behavior while using leadership style appropriately. In addition, society should also strengthen the supervision of enterprises so as to encourage enterprises to assume social responsibility and continuously promote the sustainable and healthy development of enterprises and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Shihong Cao & Hong Zhang & Qi Chen, 2024. "Leader Fault Tolerance and Employees’ Green Silent Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Ownership and Moral Disengagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6431-:d:1444152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances J. Milliken & Elizabeth W. Morrison & Patricia F. Hewlin, 2003. "An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don’t Communicate Upward and Why," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1453-1476, September.
    2. Celia Moore, 2008. "Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 129-139, June.
    3. Linn Van Dyne & Soon Ang & Isabel C. Botero, 2003. "Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1359-1392, September.
    4. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    5. Peixu He & Zhenglong Peng & Hongdan Zhao & Christophe Estay, 2019. "How and When Compulsory Citizenship Behavior Leads to Employee Silence: A Moderated Mediation Model Based on Moral Disengagement and Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi Views," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 259-274, March.
    6. Hsin-Hua Hsiung, 2012. "Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 349-361, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asma Nisar & Tahira Hassan Butt & Ghulam Abid & Saira Farooqi & Tehmina Fiaz Qazi, 2020. "Impact of grit on voice behavior: mediating role of organizational commitment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. He Peng & Feng Wei, 2020. "How and When Does Leader Behavioral Integrity Influence Employee Voice? The Roles of Team Independence Climate and Corporate Ethical Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 505-521, October.
    3. James R. Detert & Linda K. Treviño, 2010. "Speaking Up to Higher-Ups: How Supervisors and Skip-Level Leaders Influence Employee Voice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 249-270, February.
    4. Florian M. Artinger & Sabrina Artinger & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2019. "C. Y. A.: frequency and causes of defensive decisions in public administration," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 9-25, April.
    5. Xue Tong Dong & Yang Woon Chung & Jeong Kwon Yun, 2023. "The Mediating Effects of Anxiety and Happiness and the Moderating Effect of Social Network Services for Employee Silence and Psychological Withdrawal Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    6. Xiaoshuang Lin & Zhen Xiong Chen & Herman H. M. Tse & Wu Wei & Chao Ma, 2019. "Why and When Employees Like to Speak up More Under Humble Leaders? The Roles of Personal Sense of Power and Power Distance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 937-950, September.
    7. Ki-Seoung Lee & Yoon-Seo Kim & Hyoung-Chul Shin, 2023. "Effect of Hotel Employees’ Organizational Politics Perception on Organizational Silence, Organizational Cynicism, and Innovation Resistance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Chin-Yi Shu & Nguyen Thi Nhu Quynh, 2015. "Guan-Xi, Loyalty, Contribution And ‘Speak-Up Behavior: The Role of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) as Mediator and Political Skill as Moderator," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 3(2), pages 54-73.
    9. Eko Yi Liao & Chun Hui, 2021. "A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 317-370, March.
    10. Mavis Agyemang Opoku & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2019. "Psychological Safety in Ghana: Empirical Analyses of Antecedents and Consequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Lalatendu Kesari Jena & Nazia Zabin Memon, 2018. "Does Workplace Flexibility Usher Innovation? A Moderated Mediation Model on the Enablers of Innovative Workplace Behavior," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 5-17, March.
    12. Şebnem Yazıcı & Mustafa Özgenel & Mehmet Hilmi Koç & Fatih Baydar, 2022. "The Mediator Role of Employee Voice in the Effect of Agile Leadership on Teachers’ Affective Occupational Commitment," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    13. Ng, Kok-Yee & Van Dyne, Linn & Ang, Soon, 2019. "Speaking out and speaking up in multicultural settings: A two-study examination of cultural intelligence and voice behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 150-159.
    14. Inam Ul Haq & Dirk De Clercq & Muhammad Umer Azeem & Aamir Suhail, 2020. "The Interactive Effect of Religiosity and Perceived Organizational Adversity on Change-Oriented Citizenship Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 161-175, August.
    15. Moczulska Marta & Winkler Renata, 2018. "The “Burden” of Knowledge: Unwanted Knowledge in Management – The Perspective of Individual and Organizational Level," Management Sciences. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 37-44, March.
    16. Hilal BARAN & Ceren GİDERLER, 2017. "A Study on Determining the Influence of Organizational Identification on Organizational Justice and Organizational Silence," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(3), pages 242-258, March.
    17. Anna Paolillo & Jorge Sinval & Sílvia A. Silva & Vittorio E. Scuderi, 2021. "The Relationship between Inclusion Climate and Voice Behaviors beyond Social Exchange Obligation: The Role of Psychological Needs Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Bilal Khalid & Rimsha Iqbal & Syed Danial Hashmi, 2020. "Impact of workplace ostracism on knowledge hoarding: mediating role of defensive silence and moderating role of experiential avoidance," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Alexandre Asselineau & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2023. "Quiet environments and the intentional practice of silence: Towards a new perspective in the analysis of silence in organizations," Post-Print hal-04251781, HAL.
    20. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Oyniso Zakirova, 2022. "Paternalistic Leadership Styles and Employee Voice: The Roles of Trust in Supervisors and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6431-:d:1444152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.