IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5199-d1097884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Local Food Paradox: A Second Study of Local Food Affordability in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvain Charlebois

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Marie-Ève Ducharme

    (Marketing, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Mélanie Morrison

    (Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B5, Canada)

  • Janèle Vézeau

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Stacey Taylor

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

Abstract

The price of food has been affected in recent months in response to events such as the war in Ukraine, energy costs, inflation, the COVID-19 pandemic, and climate change. Indeed, supply problems, as well as the repercussions of global issues, have had an impact on grocery bills. Just between September and October 2022, the price of food increased by 11.4% and 11% year-to-year. In addition, with the pandemic, buying locally has become a key factor for some in choosing which products to consume. This second edition of the report aims to answer the question Does eating local in Quebec cost more? More precisely, our objective was to identify if local products in the food sector, especially in Quebec, were competitive in their price points compared to foods coming from other regions of the world. To answer this, we used AI and machine learning to harvest data from 99 local products and 335 comparable nonlocal products, totaling 198,990 data points and 3745 prices across six data collection dates. The results showed that a total of 25 categories displayed an advantage for the local product or a neutrality, out of a total of 45 categories identified. Our results demonstrated that 55.6% of the categories that contained the local foods analyzed were price competitive with comparable products or less expensive than them.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvain Charlebois & Marie-Ève Ducharme & Mélanie Morrison & Janèle Vézeau & Stacey Taylor, 2023. "The Local Food Paradox: A Second Study of Local Food Affordability in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5199-:d:1097884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5199/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5199/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jekanowski, Mark D. & Williams, Daniel R. & Schiek, William A., 2000. "Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase Locally Produced Agricultural Products: An Analysis of an Indiana Survey," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 43-53, April.
    2. Joyce Tait, 2001. "More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 175-189, April.
    3. Steven C. Deller & David Lamie & Maureen Stickel, 2017. "Local foods systems and community economic development," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 612-638, October.
    4. Amy Guptill & Jennifer Wilkins, 2002. "Buying into the food system: Trends in food retailing in the US and implications for local foods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 19(1), pages 39-51, March.
    5. Todd M. Schmit & Becca B. R. Jablonski & Yuri Mansury, 2016. "Assessing the Economic Impacts of Local Food System Producers by Scale," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(4), pages 316-328, November.
    6. Loureiro, Maria L. & Hine, Susan E., 2002. "Discovering Niche Markets: A Comparison Of Consumer Willingness To Pay For Local (Colorado Grown), Organic, And Gmo-Free Products," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Jekanowski, Mark D. & Williams, Daniel R., II & Schiek, William A., 2000. "Consumers' Willingness To Purchase Locally Produced Agricultural Products: An Analysis Of An Indiana Survey," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-11, April.
    8. E. DuPuis, 2000. "Not in my body: BGH and the rise of organic milk," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 17(3), pages 285-295, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos E. Carpio & Olga Isengildina-Massa, 2009. "Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 412-426.
    2. Dobbs, Leah Moore & Jensen, Kimberly L. & Leffew, Megan Bruch & English, Burton C. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Clark, Christopher D., 2016. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Tennessee Beef," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(2), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Vandermersch, Mieke & Mathijs, Erik, 2004. "Consumer Willingness To Pay For Domestic Milk," Working Papers 31829, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    4. Henseleit, Meike & Kubitzki, Sabine & Teuber, Ramona, 2007. "Determinants of Consumer Preferences for Regional Food," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7871, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Painter, Kathleen, 2008. "An Analysis of Food-Chain Demand for Differentiated Farm Commodities: Implications for the Farm Sector," Research Reports 280103, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    6. Jennifer Porter & David Conner & Jane Kolodinsky & Amy Trubek, 2017. "Get real: an analysis of student preference for real food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 921-932, December.
    7. Mwiti, Florine Karuru & Okelo, Julius & Munei, Kimpei, 2015. "Assessment Of Willingness To Pay For Quality Sweetpotato Planting Materials: The Case Of Smallholder Farmers In Tanzania," Dissertations and Theses 269713, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    8. Grebitus, Carola & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2013. "Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 67-75.
    9. Ying, Jiahui & Shonkwiler, Vanessa P. & Campbell, Benjamin L., 2018. "Willingness to Pay or Not to Pay: Valuing Foods Some Respondents Find Distasteful," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274065, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Ivana Tonkovic Prazic & Kristina Devcic & Ivana Jergovic, 2014. "Analysis Of Consumers’ Local Purchasing In Osijek Baranya County," Economy of eastern Croatia yesterday, today, tommorow, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 3, pages 427-434.
    11. Gupta, Clare & Jablonski, Becca B.R., 2016. "Farm Impacts of Farm-to-Grocer Sales: The Case of Hawai’i," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(3), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Schulz, Lee L. & Schroeder, Ted C. & White, Katharine L., 2012. "Value of Beef Steak Branding: Hedonic Analysis of Retail Scanner Data," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 41(2), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Printezis, Iryna & Grebitus, Carola, 2018. "Marketing Channels for Local Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 161-171.
    14. Frank Goedertier & Bert Weijters & Joeri Van den Bergh, 2024. "Are Consumers Equally Willing to Pay More for Brands That Aim for Sustainability, Positive Societal Contribution, and Inclusivity as for Brands That Are Perceived as Exclusive? Generational, Gender, a," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Minten, Bart & Singh, K.M. & Sutradhar, Rajib, 2011. "Branding in food retail of high value crops in Asia: Case of Makhana from Bihar (India)," MPRA Paper 54334, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 31 Jan 2011.
    16. Kanokwan Chancharoenchai & Wuthiya Saraithong, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Cassava Value Chain through the Promotion of Locally Sourced Chips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Heise, Heinke & Pirsich, Wiebke & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2014. "Criteria-Based Evaluation Of Selected European Animal Welfare Labels: Initiatives From The Poultry Meat Sector," 2014 AAEA/EAAE/CAES Joint Symposium: Social Networks, Social Media and the Economics of Food, May 29-30, 2014, Montreal, Canada 174340, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Lydia Zepeda & Anna Reznickova & Willow Russell, 2013. "CSA membership and psychological needs fulfillment: an application of self-determination theory," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(4), pages 605-614, December.
    19. Loureiro, Maria L. & Hine, Susan, 2002. "Discovering Niche Markets: A Comparison of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local (Colorado Grown), Organic, and GMO-Free Products," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 477-487, December.
    20. Andrea Marchini & Chiara Riganelli & Francesco Diotallevi & Bianca Polenzani, 2021. "Label information and consumer behaviour: evidence on drinking milk sector," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5199-:d:1097884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.