IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4301-d787088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking the Use of Ergonomics Methods to Workplace Social Sustainability: The Ovako Working Posture Assessment System and Rapid Entire Body Assessment Method

Author

Listed:
  • Brigita Gajšek

    (Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Mariborska c. 7, 3000 Celje, Slovenia)

  • Anca Draghici

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 14. Remus Str., 300191 Timisoara, Romania
    President of the ErgoWork Society in Romania.)

  • Maria Elena Boatca

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 14. Remus Str., 300191 Timisoara, Romania
    Members of the ErgoWork Society in Romania.)

  • Alin Gaureanu

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 14. Remus Str., 300191 Timisoara, Romania
    Members of the ErgoWork Society in Romania.)

  • Diana Robescu

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 14. Remus Str., 300191 Timisoara, Romania
    Members of the ErgoWork Society in Romania.)

Abstract

This article concretizes the continuous development of social sustainability in organizations based on ergonomics methods and tools, among others. Numerous scientific studies have already revealed many reasons for justifying balanced efforts towards organizational sustainability, including its economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Because the social dimension is recognized as the weakest and is often neglected, it is placed at the forefront of the present research. The link between social sustainability in the workplace and the ergonomics concept is provided through 17 underlying indicators of the workplace sustainability framework proposed in a previous study. The OWAS and REBA ergonomic risk assessment methods were used in a toolmaking company to study how results can be used directly or indirectly to determine the size or value of indicators used in the sustainability framework. The research finds that direct use of the OWAS and REBA results is not possible, but it is certain that the implementation of proposals in response to identified levels of risk affects up to four out of five factors that constitute the sustainability framework. The use of OWAS and REBA is not suitable to address environmental concerns. This study encourages companies to use ergonomic methods and tools to develop social sustainability in the workplace. It is often necessary to decide between the pen-and-paper approach and an advanced one using artificial intelligence (e.g., supported by the ErgoIA software tool). Not only the method but also the technique chosen affects the degree of sustainability achieved. Finally, relevant aspects of knowledge exploitation in the field of ergonomic education for social sustainability were summarized.

Suggested Citation

  • Brigita Gajšek & Anca Draghici & Maria Elena Boatca & Alin Gaureanu & Diana Robescu, 2022. "Linking the Use of Ergonomics Methods to Workplace Social Sustainability: The Ovako Working Posture Assessment System and Rapid Entire Body Assessment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4301-:d:787088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Isaias & Tomayess Issa & Vanessa Chang & Theodora Issa, 2015. "Outlining the Issues of Cloud Computing and Sustainability Opportunities and Risks in European Organizations: A SEM Study," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Klaus J. Zink, 2014. "Social Sustainability and Quality of Working Life," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink (ed.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management, edition 127, pages 35-55, Springer.
    3. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    4. Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink, 2014. "Sustainability and HRM," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink (ed.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management, edition 127, pages 3-32, Springer.
    5. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Remba Yanuar Efranto & Melina Andriani Santoso, 2021. "Identification of Workplace Social Sustainability Indicators Related to Employee Ergonomics Perception in Indonesian Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Bates, Reid, 2004. "A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 341-347, August.
    7. Carin Labuschagne & Alan C. Brent & Schalk J. Claasen, 2005. "Environmental and social impact considerations for sustainable project life cycle management in the process industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 38-54, March.
    8. Matias Laine, 2011. "A New Era of Sustainability: CEO Reflections on Progress to Date, Challenges Ahead and the Impact of the Journey toward a Sustainable Economy," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 106-107, April.
    9. Lamia Berrah & Vincent Cliville & Damien Trentesaux & Claude Chapel, 2021. "Industrial Performance: An Evolution Incorporating Ethics in the Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gloria Janeth Murillo-Aviña & Sialia Karina Mellink-Méndez & Josué Aarón López-Leyva & Víctor Manuel Ramos-García, 2022. "Challenges and Opportunities Post Pandemic of Organizational Ergonomics to Promote the Social Sustainability in Cultural and Creative Industries: A Critical Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Juan Ignacio Dorrego Viera & Rodrigo Bruno Santolin & Valentina Lazzarotti & Andrea Urbinati, 2024. "Sustainability decision‐making in times of crisis: An empirical study in Italy under the lens of the Russian‐Ukraine war," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3988-4006, September.
    3. Amjad, Asim & Ikramullah Butt, Shahid & Agha, Mujtaba Hassan & Ahmad, Ayyaz & Zhang, Faping & Ahmad, Shamraiz, 2023. "Integrating Ergonomics and sustainability: A framework with LDA methodology and implementation roadmap," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Oriana Helena Negulescu & Anca Draghici & Gabriela Fistis, 2022. "A Proposed Approach to Monitor and Control Sustainable Development Strategy Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aslanertik Banu Esra & Çolak Murat, 2021. "The Link Between Sustainability Reporting and the Core Characteristics of Sustainable Human Resource Management," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 57(4), pages 15-24, December.
    2. Joseph Sarkis & Marilyn Michelle Helms & Aref A. Hervani, 2010. "Reverse logistics and social sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 337-354, November.
    3. Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "A European perspective on country moderation effects: Environmental management systems and sustainability-related human resource benefits," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 379-388.
    4. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Designing Sustainable HRM: The Core Characteristics of Emerging Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Muhammad Mohiuddin & Elahe Hosseini & Sedigheh Bagheri Faradonbeh & Mehdi Sabokro, 2022. "Achieving Human Resource Management Sustainability in Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Raising the Curtain in People Management by Exploring How Sustainable HRM Translates to Practice: The Case of Lithuanian Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-31, November.
    7. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Dominika Bąk-Grabowska, 2020. "Non-Permanent Employment and Employees’ Health in the Context of Sustainable HRM with a Focus on Poland," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Shamsiya Kudratova & Xiaoxia Huang & Khikmatullo Kudratov & Shohrukh Qudratov, 2020. "Corporate sustainability and stakeholder value trade‐offs in project selection through optimization modeling: Application of investment banking," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 815-824, March.
    9. Barbara Duvnjak & Andrej Kohont, 2021. "The Role of Sustainable HRM in Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    11. Futris, Ted G. & Schramm, David G. & Richardson, Evin W. & Lee, Tae Kyoung, 2015. "The impact of organizational support on the transfer of learning to practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 36-43.
    12. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    13. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    14. Jim Butcher, 2006. "The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: a critical analysis of development implications," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(2), pages 146-156, April.
    15. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    16. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    17. Megan Devonald & Nicola Jones & Sally Youssef, 2022. "‘We Have No Hope for Anything’: Exploring Interconnected Economic, Social and Environmental Risks to Adolescents in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Rigby, Dan & Woodhouse, Phil & Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, 2001. "Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 463-478, December.
    19. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Shiferaw, Bekele & Holden, Stein, 1999. "Soil Erosion and Smallholders' Conservation Decisions in the Highlands of Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 739-752, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4301-:d:787088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.