IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11839-d919984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal Communication in R&D: Decision-Making Methods Based on Expert Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Vaida Zemlickienė

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, The Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Indrė Lapinskaitė

    (Faculty of Business Management, The Institute of Dynamic Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Zenonas Turskis

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, The Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Relatively recently, internal communication received little attention from theorists, since they focused on external communication. The importance of internal communication is seen as the taker of responsibility for all internal exchanges of information between internal stakeholders at all levels. However, interdisciplinary cooperation in terms of internal communication is a significant issue for any organization running the R&D process. Different studies have already revealed strong links between communication and R&D success, but a lack of research continuity is visible, especially one relevant in practice. This article examines communication in the R&D process through the prism of decision making. It aims to take experience from R&D experts to supplement a list of decision-making methods used in the R&D process, which is compiled based on literature analysis. In the next stage of the investigation, the list of decision-making methods is used to determine the weights of the methods, which reflect the suitability of the decision-making methods in the R&D process. In the final stage of the investigation, differences in the evaluations of the US and German experts are presented, reflecting different experiences and differences in the conditions of the business environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaida Zemlickienė & Indrė Lapinskaitė & Zenonas Turskis, 2022. "Internal Communication in R&D: Decision-Making Methods Based on Expert Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11839-:d:919984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11839/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11839/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Staniewski, Marcin W., 2016. "The contribution of business experience and knowledge to successful entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5147-5152.
    2. Vaida Zemlickiene & Raimonda Bubliene & Arturas Jakubavicius, 2018. "A model for assessing the commercial potential of high technologies," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 9(1), pages 29-54, March.
    3. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Dorothy E. Leidner, 1999. "Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 791-815, December.
    4. Negin Banaeianjahromi & Kari Smolander, 2019. "Lack of Communication and Collaboration in Enterprise Architecture Development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 877-908, August.
    5. Kanchanabha, Bhawini & Badir, Yuosre F., 2021. "Top management Team's cognitive diversity and the Firm's ambidextrous innovation capability: The mediating role of ambivalent interpretation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Martin Bizjak & Armand Faganel, 2020. "Internal Communicationn in Global Project Teams," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 15(3), pages 179-206.
    7. David Dunne, 2018. "Implementing design thinking in organizations: an exploratory study," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Becker, Markus C. & Lillemark, Morten, 2006. "Marketing/R&D integration in the pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 105-120, February.
    9. Alderman, Jillian & Forsyth, Joetta & Griffy-Brown, Charla & Walton, Richard C., 2022. "The benefits of hiring a STEM CEO: Decision making under innovation and real options," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Ann Majchrzak, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Vigilant Interaction in Knowledge Collaboration: Challenges of Online User Participation Under Ambivalence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 773-784, December.
    2. Ale Ebrahim, Nader & Ahmed Shamsuddin & Abdul Rashid, Salwa Hanim & Taha, Zahari, 2012. "Effective Virtual Teams for New Product Development," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(21), pages 1971-1985.
    3. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    4. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    5. Hong Joo Lee & Hyung Jun Ahn & Jong Woo Kim & Sung Joo Park, 2006. "Capturing and reusing knowledge in engineering change management: A case of automobile development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 375-394, December.
    6. Castellano, Sylvaine & Chandavimol, Komes & Khelladi, Insaf & Orhan, Mehmet A., 2021. "Impact of self-leadership and shared leadership on the performance of virtual R&D teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 578-586.
    7. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    8. repec:ipg:wpaper:40 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Anca Metiu, 2006. "Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 418-435, August.
    10. Fontainha, Elsa & Gannon-Leary, Pat, 2008. "Communities of Practice and Virtual Learning Communities: Benefits, barriers and success factors," MPRA Paper 8708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Stanislav Avsec, 2023. "Design Thinking to Envision More Sustainable Technology-Enhanced Teaching for Effective Knowledge Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Feng Zhang & Haina Zhang & Geoffrey G. Bell, 2021. "Corporate religiosity and individual decision on conducting entrepreneurial activity: The contingent effects of institutional environments in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 955-978, September.
    13. Chris Kimble, 2010. "Building effective virtual teams: How to overcome the problems of trust and identity in virtual teams," Post-Print halshs-00550219, HAL.
    14. Katarzyna Piwowar‐Sulej, 2021. "Core functions of Sustainable Human Resource Management. A hybrid literature review with the use of H‐Classics methodology," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 671-693, July.
    15. Nabila Jawadi & Dominique Bonet, 2013. "An examination of the factors influencing relationship building and performance in virtual R&D project teams," Working Papers 2013-40, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    16. Julia Backmann & Rouven Kanitz & Amy Wei Tian & Patrick Hoffmann & Martin Hoegl, 2020. "Cultural gap bridging in multinational teams," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(8), pages 1283-1311, October.
    17. Greenberg, Penelope Sue & Greenberg, Ralph H. & Antonucci, Yvonne Lederer, 2007. "Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 325-333.
    18. Zbigniew Brodziński & Piotr Bórawski & James W Dunn, 2017. "Development of Non-Governmental Organizations in Poland," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(4), December.
    19. Julia Darby & Stuart McIntyre & Graeme Roy, 2022. "What can analysis of 47 million job advertisements tell us about how opportunities for homeworking are evolving in the United Kingdom?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 281-302, July.
    20. Misra, Shalini & Stokols, Daniel, 2012. "A typology of people–environment relationships in the Digital Age," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 311-325.
    21. Mei-Ling Wang & Bi-Fen Hsu, 2012. "A Study to Explore the Team Virtualization Level and Team Effectiveness from the Team Personality Composition," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(2), pages 199-216, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11839-:d:919984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.