IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7711-d846772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of the EFQM Model in the Education Institution for Driving Improvement of Processes towards Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Sütőová

    (Institute of Integrated Management Systems, Faculty of Materials, Metallurgy and Recycling, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Katarína Teplická

    (Department of Management of Earth Resources, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Martin Straka

    (Institute of Logistic and Transport, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

Effective process management is a basic prerequisite for increasing the quality and performance of educational organizations. The aim of the paper is to point out the potential for the application of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Model 2020 to improve and perfect the processes in a Slovakian vocational school towards sustainability. We used the latest version of the EFQM Model and applied the questionnaire method to conduct a self-assessment. A study of the documentation was also carried out to get more insight into the processes of the school. The application of the EFQM Model 2020 pointed out weaknesses in areas such as those titled Organizational Culture, Driving Performance & Transformation, and Stakeholder Perceptions—namely, the perceptions of employees and partners. Improvements were primarily recommended in the fields of culture management to support changes, motivational processes to support creativity and innovation, human resource planning processes, employee training and development, performance indicators and performance management, and employees’ and partners’ perception measurement to enhance sustainable value for the students and key stakeholders. The paper contributes to the body of knowledge in the field of quality and performance management of Vocational Education and Training (VET) providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Sütőová & Katarína Teplická & Martin Straka, 2022. "Application of the EFQM Model in the Education Institution for Driving Improvement of Processes towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7711-:d:846772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7711/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7711/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miriam Jankalová & Radoslav Jankal, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment According to the Selected Business Excellence Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Alena Pauliková & Katarína Lestyánszka Škůrková & Lucia Kopilčáková & Antoaneta Zhelyazkova-Stoyanova & Damyan Kirechev, 2021. "Innovative Approaches to Model Visualization for Integrated Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. David Vykydal & Martin Folta & Jaroslav Nenadál, 2020. "A Study of Quality Assessment in Higher Education within the Context of Sustainable Development: A Case Study from Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Renata Turisová & Hana Pačaiová & Zuzana Kotianová & Anna Nagyová & Michal Hovanec & Peter Korba, 2021. "Evaluation of eMaintenance Application Based on the New Version of the EFQM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Escrig, Ana B. & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2015. "What characterizes leading companies within business excellence models? An analysis of “EFQM Recognized for Excellence” recipients in Spain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 362-375.
    6. Gianna Kaplani & Kostas Zafiropoulos, 2022. "A model of quality assurance in primary education management. The case of Greece," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2016555-201, December.
    7. Alba Manresa & Dalilis Escobar Rivera, 2021. "Excellence in Sustainable Management in a Changing Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Aleksandar Đorđević & Yury Klochkov & Slavko Arsovski & Nikola Stefanović & Luiza Shamina & Aleksandar Pavlović, 2021. "The Impact of ICT Support and the EFQM Criteria on Sustainable Business Excellence in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Dalilis Escobar Rivera & Maria Rosa Terradellas Piferrer & Maria Helena Benito Mundet, 2021. "Measuring Territorial Social Responsibility and Sustainability Using the EFQM Excellence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Martusewicz & Arkadiusz Wierzbic & Marcin Łukaszewicz, 2024. "Strategic Transformation and Sustainability: Unveiling the EFQM Model 2025," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yannis Politis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2022. "Incorporating the Sustainability Concept in the Major Business Excellence Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Fernando Caixeta & André M. Carvalho & Pedro Saraiva & Fausto Freire, 2022. "Sustainability-Focused Excellence: A Novel Model Integrating the Water–Energy–Food Nexus for Agro-Industrial Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Miriam Jankalová & Jana Kurotová, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment Using Economic Value Added," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. David Vykydal & Martin Folta & Jaroslav Nenadál, 2020. "A Study of Quality Assessment in Higher Education within the Context of Sustainable Development: A Case Study from Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Olena Liakh, 2021. "Accountability through Sustainability Data Governance: Reconfiguring Reporting to Better Account for the Digital Acceleration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Thomas Meier & Helena Makyšová & Alena Pauliková, 2023. "Evaluation of the Economic, Ecological and Ethical Potential of Big Data Solutions for a Digital Utopia in Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Fakhra Yasmin & Shengbing Li & Yan Zhang & Petra Poulova & Ahsan Akbar, 2021. "Unveiling the International Students’ Perspective of Service Quality in Chinese Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Tumová Dominika & Mičiak Martin & Bodingerová Michaela & Brezianská Nikola & Hrabošová Natália, 2022. "The Importance of the Study and Work Environment Ergonomics for Today’s and Future Managers and Logistics Specialists," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 119-129, January.
    9. Judit Oláh & Nicodemus Kitukutha & Hossam Haddad & Miklós Pakurár & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "Achieving Sustainable E-Commerce in Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions by Taking Possible Trade-Offs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Rebeka Kovačič Lukman & Vasja Omahne & Damjan Krajnc, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment with Integrated Circular Economy Principles: A Toy Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    11. José Manuel Arenas Reina & Juan David Cano-Moreno & Francisca Victoria Sánchez Martínez & Manuel Islán Marcos, 2021. "Methodology for Analysis and Quantitative Evaluation of Teaching Quality in University Subjects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of the Urban Cadastral System in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Andreea Barbu & Gheorghe Militaru & Dana Corina Deselnicu & Ştefan-Alexandru Catană, 2021. "Key Success Factors That Enable IT Service Providers to Achieve Organizational Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Gordana Todorović & Hrvoje Puskarić & Yury Klochkov & Vladimir Simić & Zorica Lazić & Aleksandar Đorđević, 2022. "Creating Quality-Based Smart Sustainable Public Parking Enterprises: A Methodology to Reframe Organizations into Smart Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Jaroslava Kádárová & Peter Trebuňa & Laura Lachvajderová, 2021. "Model for Optimizing the Ratios of the Company Suppliers in Slovak Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Luísa Karam de Mattos & Leonardo Flach & Alexandre Marino Costa & Rafael Pereira Ocampo Moré, 2022. "Effectiveness and Sustainability Indicators in Higher Education Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Adamik Anna & Ghinea Valentina Mihaela & Ghinea Mihalache & Nowicki Michał, 2022. "Mapping the maturity of SMART WORLD trends as a tool for developing business excellence and reducing organizational complexity," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 193-219, June.
    18. Ali Bastas & Kapila Liyanage, 2018. "ISO 9001 and Supply Chain Integration Principles Based Sustainable Development: A Delphi Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-35, December.
    19. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    20. Nicolae Al. Pop & Corina Pelau, 2017. "Correlations within the EFQM Business Excellence Model by Applying a Factor Analysis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 1-28, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7711-:d:846772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.