IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6641-d826890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating Quality-Based Smart Sustainable Public Parking Enterprises: A Methodology to Reframe Organizations into Smart Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Gordana Todorović

    (Public Utility Company “Šumadija”, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia)

  • Hrvoje Puskarić

    (Department Kragujevac, Academy of Professional Studies Sumadija, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia)

  • Yury Klochkov

    (Monitoring Center of Science and Education, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Vladimir Simić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zorica Lazić

    (Faculty of Management, Belgrade Metropolitan University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Đorđević

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia)

Abstract

Enterprise sustainability is a key aim in the fourth industrial revolution era, requiring a new approach based on intelligent technologies that considers the new roles of leadership and sustainability as well as the new trends in emerging smart technologies, with a new focus on Society 5.0. Smart parking has a significant role in fostering the determinants of sustainability in public parking enterprises and achieving adequate mobility in smart cities. Thus, smart parking is the subject of the research presented in this paper. This study defines the vital processes, including leadership processes and technologies needed for smart parking, managed by innovative public parking enterprises. Having this in mind, trends, key facts, the results of present innovative technology enterprises, and methodologies for designing and establishing smart public parking enterprises are analyzed. This paper aims to determine the sustainability of parking enterprises in their current states by developing a MORSO methodology. The MORSO methodology includes independent variables, including the leadership level of the intelligent technologies used, quality of the business processes, and risk related to the business processes, and a dependent variable, the sustainability of smart public parking enterprises. The MORSO methodology also includes steps for the definition of indices related to variables that could be assessed by appropriate techniques such as using questionnaires. Finally, the MORSO methodology introduces steps by which statistical approaches and artificial neural networks (ANN) are applied to test hypotheses regarding correlations between independent and dependent variables. The results of the presented model case study application show that there are strong correlations between smart sustainability and leadership (0.769), quality (0.904), and risk (−0.884), respectively. Additionally, at the level of the presented case study, the results of the application of the ANN indicate that the values of the dependent variable in the following time period can be determined with high accuracy, based on the knowledge of the values from the previous period, with a regression coefficient value of R = 0.99482. Finally, in this way, the transition from existing public enterprises to sustainable smart public parking enterprises is envisioned.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordana Todorović & Hrvoje Puskarić & Yury Klochkov & Vladimir Simić & Zorica Lazić & Aleksandar Đorđević, 2022. "Creating Quality-Based Smart Sustainable Public Parking Enterprises: A Methodology to Reframe Organizations into Smart Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6641-:d:826890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Lower & Agnieszka Szumilas, 2021. "Parking Policy as a Tool of Sustainable Mobility-Parking Standards in Poland vs. European Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. E Revilla & J Sarkis & A Modrego, 2003. "Evaluating performance of public–private research collaborations: A DEA analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(2), pages 165-174, February.
    3. Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar & Andrés Navarro Galera & Laura Alcaide Muñoz & María Deseada López Subirés, 2016. "Risk Factors and Drivers of Financial Sustainability in Local Government: An Empirical Study," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 29-51, January.
    4. Bill Hopwood & Mary Mellor & Geoff O'Brien, 2005. "Sustainable development: mapping different approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 38-52.
    5. Escrig, Ana B. & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2015. "What characterizes leading companies within business excellence models? An analysis of “EFQM Recognized for Excellence” recipients in Spain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 362-375.
    6. Tang, Ou & Nurmaya Musa, S., 2011. "Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 25-34, September.
    7. Delyse Springett, 2003. "Business conceptions of sustainable development: a perspective from critical theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 71-86, March.
    8. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "How do Global Manufacturing Companies Mitigate Supply Chain Risks," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 77-91, Springer.
    9. Slavko Arsovski & Gordana Todorovic & Zorica Lazić & Zora Arsovski & Nikolina Ljepava & Aleksandar Aleksic, 2017. "Model for Selection of the Best Location Based on Fuzzy AHP and Hurwitz Methods," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, September.
    10. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Managing Supply Chain Risk," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-3238-8, March.
    11. Michael Maloni & Michael Brown, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 35-52, September.
    12. James G. March & Zur Shapira, 1987. "Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(11), pages 1404-1418, November.
    13. Majda Ivić & Jelena Kilić & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac, 2020. "Decision Support to Sustainable Parking Management—Investment Planning through Parking Fines to Improve Pedestrian Flows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    2. Higgins, Colin & Walker, Robyn, 2012. "Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 194-208.
    3. Anasse Amarouche & Philippe Chapellier & Alain George, 2018. "La gestion des risques dans une chaîne d’approvisionnement [La gestion des risques dans une chaine d'approvisionnement : Le cas de la filière d'approvisionnement en fruits et légumes d'une entrepri," Post-Print hal-02101506, HAL.
    4. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    5. Hendrik S. Birkel & Johannes W. Veile & Julian M. Müller & Evi Hartmann & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Mert Bilgin, 2012. "The PEARL Model of Sustainable Development," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 19-35, May.
    7. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    8. Málovics, György & Dombi, Judit, 2015. "A növekedésen túl - egy új irányzat hozzájárulása a fenntarthatósági vitához [Beyond growth - the contribution of a new direction to the debate on sustainability]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 200-221.
    9. Mishra, Deepa & Sharma, R.R.K. & Kumar, Sameer & Dubey, Rameshwar, 2016. "Bridging and buffering: Strategies for mitigating supply risk and improving supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 183-197.
    10. Markus J. Milne & Helen Tregidga & Sara Walton, 2009. "Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(8), pages 1211-1257, October.
    11. Dubey, Vivek Kumar & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Veeramani, Dharmaraj, 2018. "Analytical framework for sustainable supply-chain contract management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 240-261.
    12. D. Rachel Lombardi & Libby Porter & Austin Barber & Chris D.F. Rogers, 2011. "Conceptualising Sustainability in UK Urban Regeneration: a Discursive Formation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(2), pages 273-296, February.
    13. Parenreng, Syarifuddin Mabe & Pujawan, Nyoman & Karningsih, Putu Dana & Engelseth, Per, 2016. "Mitigating Risk in the Tuna Supply through Traceability System Development," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Øyvind Ihlen, 2009. "The oxymoron of ‘sustainable oil production’: the case of the Norwegian oil industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 53-63, January.
    15. Sorola, Matthew, 2022. "Q methodology to conduct a critical study in accounting: A Q study on accountants’ perspectives of social and environmental reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Alexandre Lapeyre & Annie Bonnefont, 2012. "Quelles sont les évocations du développement durable ?," Post-Print hal-03829652, HAL.
    17. Winter, Peter, 2007. "Managerial Risk Accounting and Control – A German perspective," MPRA Paper 8185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Li, Xu & Vermeulen, Freek, 2021. "High risk, low return (and vice versa): the effect of product innovation on firm performance in a transition economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120268, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Narduzzo, Alessandro & Warglien, Massimo, 1996. "Learning from the Experience of Others: An Experiment on Information Contagion," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(1), pages 113-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6641-:d:826890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.