IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11483-d658685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Practices in Working Contexts: Supervision, Collective Narrative, Generative Humour, and Professional Respect

Author

Listed:
  • Livia Cadei

    (Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Emanuele Serrelli

    (Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Domenico Simeone

    (Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Research literature and field experience reveal that jobs in social education—just like other jobs with a high interpersonal involvement—feature a high risk of job burnout. By necessity, work organizations in social education have developed a definite set of practices to support their workers and provide occasions for mutual support. Here we analyze four of these practices—supervision, collective narrative, generative humour, and professional respect—and suggest ways in which organizations in other sectors may consider importing them to increase their own organizational sustainability. We also present an analysis of workers’ second-level skills (such as narrative skills, reflexive skills, team working skills) that are related to sustainability practices: on the one hand they allow the individual worker to effectively take part and contribute, on the other hand their development is stimulated by such participation. Organizational sustainability is in fact to be considered a positive collaboration between individuals and organization, rather than a one-way, top-down condition. Increases in sustainability may result from cascading effects triggered by management decisions as well as by workers’ individual and collective actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Livia Cadei & Emanuele Serrelli & Domenico Simeone, 2021. "Sustainability Practices in Working Contexts: Supervision, Collective Narrative, Generative Humour, and Professional Respect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11483-:d:658685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    3. Elias Carayannis & Stavros Sindakis & Christian Walter, 2015. "Business Model Innovation as Lever of Organizational Sustainability," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 85-104, February.
    4. Katarzyna Piwowar‐Sulej, 2021. "Core functions of Sustainable Human Resource Management. A hybrid literature review with the use of H‐Classics methodology," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 671-693, July.
    5. App, Stefanie & Merk, Janina & Buettgen, Marion, 2012. "Employer Branding: Sustainable HRM as a Competitive Advantage in the Market for High-Quality Employees," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(3), pages 262-278.
    6. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Ming-Chuan Yu & Qiang Mai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yi Dai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    10. App, Stefanie & Merk, Janina & Buettgen, Marion, 2012. "Employer Branding: Sustainable HRM as a Competitive Advantage in the Market for High-Quality Employees," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(3), pages 262-278.
    11. Abdulla Hasan Almarzooqi & Mehmood Khan & Khalizani Khalid, 2019. "The role of sustainable HRM in sustaining positive organizational outcomes," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 68(7), pages 1272-1292, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Pološki Vokić, 2015. "Competitiveness and sustainability of HRM activities in Croatia –CRANET survey results," EFZG Working Papers Series 1506, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    2. Baruk Agnieszka Izabela, 2016. "Perception of the University as an Employer Among Young Potential Employees," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 21(3), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Alina Daniela MIHALCEA, 2017. "Employer Branding and Talent Management in the Digital Age," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 289-306, June.
    4. Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Carmen Abril, 2024. "Sustainability oriented innovation and organizational values: a cluster analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Francisco Rincon‐Roldan & Alvaro Lopez‐Cabrales, 2021. "Ethical values in social economy for sustainable development," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 705-729, December.
    6. Ingen, Ramon van & Ruiter, Melanie De & Peters, Pascale & Kodden, Bas & Robben, Henry, 2021. "Engaging Through Purpose: The Mediating Role of Person–Organizational Purpose Fit in the Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Purpose and Work Engagement," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 32(2), pages 85-105.
    7. Kristina Črnjar & Jasmina Dlačić & Borut Milfelner, 2020. "Analysing the Relationship Between Hotels’ Internal Marketing and Employee Engagement Dimensions," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(SI), pages 49-65.
    8. Michael Kozak, 2018. "Conceptualizing Employer Branding: Is the Whole More than the Sum of Its Parts? Case Study-Based Evidence from Thailand," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 4(5), pages 197-207.
    9. Mölk, Andreas, 2018. "Structures, strategizing, and contested territories: A structuration perspective on strategy development in employer branding," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 326-334.
    10. Laila Benraiss Noailles & Catherine Viot, 2021. "Ancrages et mirages de la marque employeur, une construction sensible," Post-Print hal-04574046, HAL.
    11. Wagih Salama & Mohamed Nor El Deen & Azzam Albakhit & Karam Zaki, 2022. "Understanding the Connection between Sustainable Human Resource Management and the Hotel Business Outcomes: Evidence from the Green-Certified Hotels of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Rybaczewska, Maria & Sparks, Leigh & Sułkowski, Šukasz, 2020. "Consumers’ purchase decisions and employer image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    13. Burmann, Christoph & Piehler, Rico, 2013. "Employer Branding vs. Internal Branding – Ein Vorschlag zur Integration im Rahmen der identitätsbasierten Markenführung," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 67(3), pages 223-245.
    14. Patrycja Palen-Tondel & Alicja Smolbik-Jeczmien, 2021. "Looking for a Fulcrum- Are Preferred Work Values Different for Four Generation Cohorts Co-existing in the Labour Market of Poland?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 102-119.
    15. Lorenzo Revuelto-Taboada & María Teresa Canet-Giner & Francisco Balbastre-Benavent, 2021. "High-Commitment Work Practices and the Social Responsibility Issue: Interaction and Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Bejtkovský Jiří, 2018. "Factors influencing the job search and job selection in students of Generation Y in the Czech Republic in the employer branding context," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1133-1149, September.
    17. Fieras Alfawaire & Tarik Atan, 2021. "The Effect of Strategic Human Resource and Knowledge Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantages at Jordanian Universities: The Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-35, July.
    18. Șupeală Doru, 2018. "Inspire to Hire and Win the War for Talents," Marketing – from Information to Decision Journal, Sciendo, vol. 1(2), pages 54-66, December.
    19. Hyun-Duck Kim, 2021. "Analyzing Sustainability Reports of Global, Public Corporations by Industrial Sectors and National Origins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Dominika Bąk-Grabowska, 2020. "Non-Permanent Employment and Employees’ Health in the Context of Sustainable HRM with a Focus on Poland," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11483-:d:658685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.