IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10315-d636264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancement on Thermal Comfort in Educational Buildings: Current Issues and Way Forward

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Lamberti

    (School of Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Giacomo Salvadori

    (School of Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Francesco Leccese

    (School of Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Fabio Fantozzi

    (School of Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Philomena M. Bluyssen

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The thermal environment in educational buildings is crucial to improve students’ health and productivity, as they spend a considerable amount of time in classrooms. Due to the complexity of educational buildings, research performed has been heterogeneous and standards for thermal comfort are based on office studies with adults. Moreover, they rely on single dose-response models that do not account for interactions with other environmental factors, or students’ individual preferences and needs. A literature study was performed on thermal comfort in educational buildings comprising of 143 field studies, to identify all possible confounding parameters involved in thermal perception. Educational stage, climate zone, model adopted to investigate comfort, and operation mode were then selected as confounding parameters and discussed to delineate the priorities for future research. Results showed that children often present with different thermal sensations than adults, which should be considered in the design of energy-efficient and comfortable educational environments. Furthermore, the use of different models to analyse comfort can influence field studies’ outcomes and should be carefully investigated. It is concluded that future studies should focus on a more rational evaluation of thermal comfort, also considering the effect that local discomfort can have on the perception of an environment. Moreover, it is important to carefully assess possible relationships between HVAC systems, building envelope, and thermal comfort, including their effect on energy consumption. Since several studies showed that the perception of the environment does not concern thermal comfort only, but it involves the aspects of indoor air, acoustic, and visual quality, their effect on the health and performance of the students should be assessed. This paper provides a way forward for researchers, which should aim to have an integrated approach through considering the positive effects of indoor exposure while considering possible individual differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Lamberti & Giacomo Salvadori & Francesco Leccese & Fabio Fantozzi & Philomena M. Bluyssen, 2021. "Advancement on Thermal Comfort in Educational Buildings: Current Issues and Way Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10315-:d:636264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel Ángel Campano & Samuel Domínguez-Amarillo & Jesica Fernández-Agüera & Juan José Sendra, 2019. "Thermal Perception in Mild Climate: Adaptive Thermal Models for Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Boutet, M.L. & Hernández, A.L. & Jacobo, G.J., 2020. "Methodology of quantitative analysis and diagnosis of higro-thermal and lighting monitoring for school buildings in a hot-humid mid-latitude climate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 2463-2476.
    3. Orosa, José A. & Oliveira, Armando C., 2012. "A field study on building inertia and its effects on indoor thermal environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 89-96.
    4. Leonidas Bourikas & Stephanie Gauthier & Nicholas Khor Song En & Peiyao Xiong, 2021. "Effect of Thermal, Acoustic and Air Quality Perception Interactions on the Comfort and Satisfaction of People in Office Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Liang, Han-Hsi & Lin, Tzu-Ping & Hwang, Ruey-Lung, 2012. "Linking occupants’ thermal perception and building thermal performance in naturally ventilated school buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 355-363.
    6. Li, Qing & Zhang, Lianying & Zhang, Limao & Wu, Xianguo, 2021. "Optimizing energy efficiency and thermal comfort in building green retrofit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    7. Fabio Fantozzi & Hassan Hamdi & Michele Rocca & Stefano Vegnuti, 2019. "Use of Automated Control Systems and Advanced Energy Simulations in the Design of Climate Responsive Educational Building for Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Zomorodian, Zahra Sadat & Tahsildoost, Mohammad & Hafezi, Mohammadreza, 2016. "Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 895-906.
    9. Carmen María Calama-González & Rafael Suárez & Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez & Simone Ferrari, 2019. "Assessment of Indoor Environmental Quality for Retrofitting Classrooms with An Egg-Crate Shading Device in A Hot Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edyta Dudkiewicz & Marta Laska & Natalia Fidorów-Kaprawy, 2021. "Users’ Sensations in the Context of Energy Efficiency Maintenance in Public Utility Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Sanjay Kumar & Manoj Kumar Singh & Nedhal Al-Tamimi & Badr S. Alotaibi & Mohammed Awad Abuhussain, 2022. "Investigation on Subjects’ Seasonal Perception and Adaptive Actions in Naturally Ventilated Hostel Dormitories in the Composite Climate Zone of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Antonella Yaacoub & Moez Esseghir & Leila Merghem-Boulahia, 2023. "A Review of Different Methodologies to Study Occupant Comfort and Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Kai Xin & Jingyuan Zhao & Tianhui Wang & Weijun Gao, 2022. "Supporting Design to Develop Rural Revitalization through Investigating Village Microclimate Environments: A Case Study of Typical Villages in Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Ewa Zender-Świercz & Marek Telejko & Beata Galiszewska & Mariola Starzomska, 2022. "Assessment of Thermal Comfort in Rooms Equipped with a Decentralised Façade Ventilation Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Zhiqiang Shi & Qianni Liu & Zhongjun Zhang & Tianhao Yue, 2022. "Thermal Comfort in the Design Classroom for Architecture in the Cold Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. V. S. K. V. Harish & Arun Kumar & Tabish Alam & Paolo Blecich, 2021. "Assessment of State-Space Building Energy System Models in Terms of Stability and Controllability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Kalliopi G. Droutsa & Simon Kontoyiannidis & Constantinos A. Balaras & Athanassios A. Argiriou & Elena G. Dascalaki & Konstantinos V. Varotsos & Christos Giannakopoulos, 2021. "Climate Change Scenarios and Their Implications on the Energy Performance of Hellenic Non-Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Betty Lala & Solli Murtyas & Aya Hagishima, 2022. "Indoor Thermal Comfort and Adaptive Thermal Behaviors of Students in Primary Schools Located in the Humid Subtropical Climate of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Rana Elnaklah & Yara Ayyad & Saba Alnusairat & Husam AlWaer & Abdulsalam AlShboul, 2023. "A Comparison of Students’ Thermal Comfort and Perceived Learning Performance between Two Types of University Halls: Architecture Design Studios and Ordinary Lecture Rooms during the Heating Season," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.
    11. Mishan Shrestha & Hom Bahadur Rijal, 2023. "Investigation on Summer Thermal Comfort and Passive Thermal Improvements in Naturally Ventilated Nepalese School Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, January.
    12. Dongsu Kim & Jongman Lee & Sunglok Do & Pedro J. Mago & Kwang Ho Lee & Heejin Cho, 2022. "Energy Modeling and Model Predictive Control for HVAC in Buildings: A Review of Current Research Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-30, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attia, Shady & Shadmanfar, Niloufar & Ricci, Federico, 2020. "Developing two benchmark models for nearly zero energy schools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Zomorodian, Zahra Sadat & Tahsildoost, Mohammad & Hafezi, Mohammadreza, 2016. "Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 895-906.
    3. Lixia Wang & Pawan Kumar & Mamookho Elizabeth Makhatha & Vishal Jagota, 2022. "Numerical simulation of air distribution for monitoring the central air conditioning in large atrium," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 340-352, March.
    4. Betty Lala & Solli Murtyas & Aya Hagishima, 2022. "Indoor Thermal Comfort and Adaptive Thermal Behaviors of Students in Primary Schools Located in the Humid Subtropical Climate of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Dariel López-López & Antonio Serrano-Jiménez & Juan Gavilanes & Ferran Ventura-Blanch & Ángela Barrios-Padura & Carmen Díaz-López, 2023. "A Study on the Parametric Design Parameters That Influence Environmental Ergonomics and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, April.
    6. Xin Yuan & Yuji Ryu, 2022. "Evaluation of Children’s Thermal Environment in Nursery School: Through the Questionnaire and Measurement of Wearable Sensors Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Carolina Rodriguez & María Coronado & Marta D’Alessandro & Juan Medina, 2019. "The Importance of Standardised Data-Collection Methods in the Improvement of Thermal Comfort Assessment Models for Developing Countries in the Tropics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Alicia Alonso & Jesús Llanos & Rocío Escandón & Juan J. Sendra, 2021. "Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort of Primary Schools in Winter in a Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Girish Rentala & Yimin Zhu & Neil M. Johannsen, 2021. "Impact of Outdoor Temperature Variations on Thermal State in Experiments Using Immersive Virtual Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-36, September.
    10. Rodrigues, Eugénio & Fernandes, Marco S. & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Gomes, Álvaro & Costa, José J., 2019. "Thermal transmittance effect on energy consumption of Mediterranean buildings with different thermal mass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    12. Jungwon Yoon & Sanghyun Bae, 2020. "Performance Evaluation and Design of Thermo-Responsive SMP Shading Prototypes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-35, May.
    13. Ángel M. Costa & Rebeca Bouzón & Diego Vergara & José A. Orosa, 2019. "Eco-friendly Pressure Drop Dehumidifier: An Experimental and Numerical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Carla Balocco & Lorenzo Leoncini, 2020. "Energy Cost for Effective Ventilation and Air Quality for Healthy Buildings: Plant Proposals for a Historic Building School Reopening in the Covid-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Konstantinos Sofias & Zoe Kanetaki & Constantinos Stergiou & Sébastien Jacques, 2023. "Combining CAD Modeling and Simulation of Energy Performance Data for the Retrofit of Public Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Agustín Zaballos & Alan Briones & Alba Massa & Pol Centelles & Víctor Caballero, 2020. "A Smart Campus’ Digital Twin for Sustainable Comfort Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, November.
    17. Van Craenendonck, Stijn & Lauriks, Leen & Vuye, Cedric & Kampen, Jarl, 2018. "A review of human thermal comfort experiments in controlled and semi-controlled environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3365-3378.
    18. Liu, Gang & Chen, Huizhen & Yuan, Ye & Song, Chenge, 2024. "Indoor thermal environment and human health: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Payam Nejat & Fatemeh Jomehzadeh & Hasanen Mohammed Hussen & John Kaiser Calautit & Muhd Zaimi Abd Majid, 2018. "Application of Wind as a Renewable Energy Source for Passive Cooling through Windcatchers Integrated with Wing Walls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Iasmin Lourenço Niza & Evandro Eduardo Broday, 2022. "An Analysis of Thermal Comfort Models: Which One Is Suitable Model to Assess Thermal Reality in Brazil?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10315-:d:636264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.