IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2743-d339515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What if Employees Brought Their Life to Work? The Relation of Life Satisfaction and Work Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Ferreira

    (Department of Economics and Management, University Portucalense, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carla Gabriel

    (Higher InstituteMiguel Torga, 3000-132 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Sílvia Faria

    (Department of Economics and Management, University Portucalense, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Pedro Rodrigues

    (Department of Economics and Management, University Lusíada-North, 4369-006 Porto, Portugal)

  • Manuel Sousa Pereira

    (Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

Abstract

Previous research on work engagement has sought to understand the drivers, as well as the consequences, of engaging people at work. The drivers of engagement have been found mainly within the work domain. However, working life is not detached from personal life, which has been demonstrated by research on work-life balance. The goal of this research is to understand the relation between life satisfaction and work engagement. Data were collected from a sample of 571 employees from major Portuguese companies using a questionnaire. The results confirmed the constructs used, and the regression model showed that life satisfaction is related to work engagement. The main conclusion was that work engagement can be explained by factors external to the organization, which are an integral part of employees’ lives. Being a psychological and emotional state, work engagement can be related to other aspects of employees’ lives besides their organizational and job roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Ferreira & Carla Gabriel & Sílvia Faria & Pedro Rodrigues & Manuel Sousa Pereira, 2020. "What if Employees Brought Their Life to Work? The Relation of Life Satisfaction and Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2743-:d:339515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfredo Rodríguez-Muñoz & Ana Sanz-Vergel & Evangelia Demerouti & Arnold Bakker, 2014. "Engaged at Work and Happy at Home: A Spillover–Crossover Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 271-283, April.
    2. M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee, 2018. "Work-Life Balance: an Integrative Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(1), pages 229-254, March.
    3. Judge, Timothy A. & Hulin, Charles L., 1993. "Job Satisfaction as a Reflection of Disposition: A Multiple Source Causal Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 388-421, December.
    4. Oana Apostol & Salme Näsi, 2014. "Firm–Employee Relationships from a Social Responsibility Perspective: Developments from Communist Thinking to Market Ideology in Romania. A Mass Media Story," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 301-315, February.
    5. Janice Byrne & Anna Canato, 2017. "It’s been a hard day’s night," Post-Print hal-01745257, HAL.
    6. Sousa-Poza, Alfonso & Sousa-Poza, Andres A., 2000. "Well-being at work: a cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 517-538, November.
    7. Pedro Ferreira & Paula Rodrigues, 2018. "Engagement as an antecedent of the satisfaction-performance relation: a study with line managers," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1/2), pages 32-50.
    8. Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink, 2014. "Sustainability and HRM," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink (ed.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management, edition 127, pages 3-32, Springer.
    9. Moeller, Julia & Ivcevic, Zorana & White, Arielle E. & Menges, Jochen & Brackett, Marc A., 2018. "Highly Engaged but Burned Out: Intra-Individual Profiles in the US Workforce," OSF Preprints h6qnf, Center for Open Science.
    10. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    11. Marcus Wagner, 2013. "‘Green’ Human Resource Benefits: Do they Matter as Determinants of Environmental Management System Implementation?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 443-456, May.
    12. Neha Garg & Pankaj Singh, 2020. "Work engagement as a mediator between subjective well-being and work-and-health outcomes," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(6), pages 735-752, January.
    13. Nathalie Hirsig & Nikolai Rogovsky & Michael Elkin, 2014. "Enterprise Sustainability and HRM in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink (ed.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management, edition 127, pages 127-152, Springer.
    14. Ina Ehnert, 2014. "Paradox as a Lens for Theorizing Sustainable HRM," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink (ed.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management, edition 127, pages 247-271, Springer.
    15. Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42345, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Ed Diener & Ronald Inglehart & Louis Tay, 2013. "Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 497-527, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Mikołajczyk, 2021. "Sustainable Development of an Individual as a Result of Mutual Enrichment of Professional and Personal Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Usama Najam & Umar Burki & Wajiha Khalid, 2020. "Does Work-Life Balance Moderate the Relationship between Career Commitment and Career Success? Evidence from an Emerging Asian Economy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Sypniewska & Małgorzata Baran & Monika Kłos, 2023. "Work engagement and employee satisfaction in the practice of sustainable human resource management – based on the study of Polish employees," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1069-1100, September.
    2. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang, 2019. "Science Mapping the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Human Resource Management, 1982–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Designing Sustainable HRM: The Core Characteristics of Emerging Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Raising the Curtain in People Management by Exploring How Sustainable HRM Translates to Practice: The Case of Lithuanian Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-31, November.
    5. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    6. Tilahun Kidane Diko & Shabnam Saxena, 2023. "Antecedents and outcome of employee engagement: Empirical study of Ethiopian public higher education institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Nasser Saad Al Kahtani & Sulphey M. M., 2022. "A Study on How Psychological Capital, Social Capital, Workplace Wellbeing, and Employee Engagement Relate to Task Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    8. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Hazrat Bilal & Naveed Farooq & Kauser Hayat, 2019. "Empirically Investigating the Impact of Employee Engagement on Counterproductive Work Behavior of Academic Staff," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 120-127, March.
    10. Marta Graça & Leonor Pais & Lisete Mónico & Nuno Rebelo Dos Santos & Tânia Ferraro & Rita Berger, 2021. "Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 917-939, June.
    11. Zeidan Susan & Itani Noura, 2020. "Cultivating Employee Engagement in Organizations: Development of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 28(1), pages 99-118, March.
    12. Aslanertik Banu Esra & Çolak Murat, 2021. "The Link Between Sustainability Reporting and the Core Characteristics of Sustainable Human Resource Management," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 57(4), pages 15-24, December.
    13. Ana Junça-Silva & António Caetano & Rita Rueff Lopes, 2017. "Daily Uplifts, Well-Being and Performance in Organizational Settings: The Differential Mediating Roles of Affect and Work Engagement," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 591-606, April.
    14. Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "A European perspective on country moderation effects: Environmental management systems and sustainability-related human resource benefits," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 379-388.
    15. Coun, Martine J.H. & Peters, Pascale & Blomme, Rob J., 2019. "‘Let's share!’ The mediating role of employees' self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 481-491.
    16. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2021. "Linkage between Leaders’ Behaviour in Performance Management, Organisational Justice and Work Engagement in Public Sector," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Krista Lynn Minnotte & Michael C. Minnotte & Krista Thompson, 2016. "The Life Satisfaction of Dual-Earner Mothers and Fathers: Does Flexible Scheduling Matter?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 2365-2388, December.
    18. Caterina Fiorilli & Ilaria Buonomo & Luciano Romano & Ylenia Passiatore & Domenica Fioredistella Iezzi & Paolo Emilio Santoro & Paula Benevene & Alessandro Pepe, 2020. "Teacher Confidence in Professional Training: The Predictive Roles of Engagement and Burnout," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    19. Mikael Nordenmark & Niclas Almén & Stig Vinberg, 2020. "Work/Family Conflict of More Importance than Psychosocial Working Conditions and Family Conditions for Mental Wellbeing," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Fabian Onyekachi Ugwu & Ibeawuchi K. Enwereuzor & Jens Mazei, 2023. "Is Working from Home a Blessing or a Burden? Home Demands as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work-Life Balance," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 341-364, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2743-:d:339515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.