IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10690-d465950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mainstreaming Agricultural Biodiversity in Traditional Production Landscapes for Sustainable Development: The Indian Scenario

Author

Listed:
  • Ishwari Singh Bisht

    (The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, NASC Complex, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Jai Chand Rana

    (The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, NASC Complex, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Rashmi Yadav

    (ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Sudhir Pal Ahlawat

    (ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India)

Abstract

Mainstreaming biodiversity in production landscapes ensures conservation and sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity, the key objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the projects supported by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Environment Facility (GEF). Mainstreaming integrates biodiversity in existing or new programs and policies, both cross-sectoral and sector-specific. The conventional model of agricultural production with limited diversity in production systems and use of high chemical input has taught us a valuable lesson as it is adversely impacting the environment, the essential ecosystem services, the soil health and the long term sustainability of our food systems. Using a qualitative participant observation approach, our study investigated four distinct traditional Indian production landscapes to gage (i) the farming communities’ response to institutional policies, programs and agricultural biodiversity-related activities in traditional Indian production landscapes and (ii) opportunities and challenges for sustainable development in smallholder traditional Indian farming systems. Results indicate that the top-down decision-making regime is the least effective towards achieving sustainable development in traditional Indian farming landscapes and that farmers’ experiential knowledge on participatory biodiversity management, maintenance and use for sustainable development are of critical importance to India’s agriculture and economy. Reclaiming agriculture’s spiritual roots through organic farming and locally grown food emerged as key, including the need for designing and implementing a more sovereign food system. Revisiting traditional smallholder farming under the COVID-19 pandemic and lessons learned for repurposing India’s agricultural policy are also highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishwari Singh Bisht & Jai Chand Rana & Rashmi Yadav & Sudhir Pal Ahlawat, 2020. "Mainstreaming Agricultural Biodiversity in Traditional Production Landscapes for Sustainable Development: The Indian Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10690-:d:465950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10690/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10690/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlson, Andrea & Jaenicke, Edward, 2016. "Changes in Retail Organic Price Premiums from 2004 to 2010," Economic Research Report 242448, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Caroline Petersen & Brian Huntley, 2005. "Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Production Landscapes," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7413.
    3. Gayathri Vasudevan & Shanu Singh & Gaurav Gupta & C. K. Jalajakshi, 2020. "MGNREGA in the Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: Can India do More with Less?," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 63(3), pages 799-814, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Queiroz-Stein, Guilherme & Martinelli, Fernanda S. & Dietz, Thomas & Siegel, Karen M., 2024. "Disputing the bioeconomy-biodiversity nexus in Brazil: Coalitions, discourses and policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sohae Eve Oh & Tomislav Vukina, 2018. "Substitutability between organic and conventional poultry products and organic price premiums," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(1), pages 75-92.
    2. Seufert, Verena & Ramankutty, Navin & Mayerhofer, Tabea, 2017. "What is this thing called organic? – How organic farming is codified in regulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 10-20.
    3. Matthias Staudigel & Aleksej Trubnikov, 2022. "High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(2), pages 309-334, April.
    4. Stewart, Hayden & Kuchler, Fred & Dong, Diansheng & Cessna, Jerry, 2021. "Examining the Decline in U.S. Per Capita Consumption of Fluid Cow’s Milk, 2003–18," Economic Research Report 327183, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Carlson, Andrea & Greene, Catherine & Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon & Hitaj, Claudia & Ha, Kim & Cavigelli, Michel & Ferrier, Peyton & McBride, William, 2023. "U.S. Organic Production, Markets, Consumers, and Policy, 2000-21," USDA Miscellaneous 333551, United States Department of Agriculture.
    6. Maya Hammad & Fabianna Bacil & Fábio Veras Soares, 2021. "Next Practices—Innovations in the COVID-19 social protection responses and beyond," Research Report 60, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    7. Lesly Cassin & Paolo Melindi-Ghidi & Fabien Prieur, 2021. "The impact of income inequality on public environmental expenditure with green consumerism," Working Papers 2021.08, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    8. Carlson, Andrea C. & Waldrop, Megan, 2018. "Estimating Retail Organic Price Premiums for Snack Foods Using Scanner Data from 2013 to 2016," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274053, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Feliu López-i-Gelats & Jordi Bartolomé Filella, 2020. "Examining the role of organic production schemes in Mediterranean pastoralism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5771-5792, August.
    10. Zahniser, Steven & Avendaño Ruíz, Belem & Astill, Gregory, 2023. "How Mexico’s Horticultural Export Sector Responded to the Food Safety Modernization Act," Economic Research Report 338954, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Narayan Chandra Nayak & Bimal Kishore Sahoo & Alok Ranjan Mohanty, 2023. "Do Mahatma Gandhi NREGA and convergence measures arrest distress migration? An empirical assessment of the migration-prone regions of Odisha, India," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Page, Elina T & Short, Gianna & Sneeringer, Stacy & Bowman, Maria, 2021. "The Market for Chicken Raised Without Antibiotics, 2012–17," Economic Information Bulletin 327364, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Staudigel, Matthias & Trubnikov, Aleksej, 2018. "How do organic price premiums vary across different supply and demand side factors? A hedonic analysis of the German market for fresh meat," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273989, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Adam Pawlewicz, 2020. "Change of Price Premiums Trend for Organic Food Products: The Example of the Polish Egg Market," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Tatiana Drugova & Kynda R. Curtis & Sherzod B. Akhundjanov, 2020. "Are multiple labels on food products beneficial or simply ignored?," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 68(4), pages 411-427, December.
    16. Wei, Hanlin & Goodhue, Rachael & Zhang, Minghua, 2024. "Pesticide Use and Cropland Consolidation in California Organic Agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Wilson, Lacey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2020. "Consumer willingness to pay for redundant food labels," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Pingan Xiang & Zhizhen Liu, 2024. "Is It Both Sufficient and Necessary to Disclose Environmental Information Regarding the Origin on Consumer Purchases?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Syed Badruddoza & Andrea C. Carlson & Jill J. McCluskey, 2022. "Long‐term dynamics of US organic milk, eggs, and yogurt premiums," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 45-72, January.
    20. Yuting Liu & Abdoul G. Sam, 2022. "The organic premium of baby food based on market segments," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 533-556, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10690-:d:465950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.