IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10497-d650847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Sustainable Performance (E-SuPer): Theoretical Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Psychometric Properties

Author

Listed:
  • Tianchang Ji

    (Department of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, NL-3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Jan de Jonge

    (Department of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, NL-3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Human Performance Management Group, Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, NL-5600 Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Maria C. W. Peeters

    (Department of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, NL-3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Human Performance Management Group, Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, NL-5600 Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Toon W. Taris

    (Department of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, NL-3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Although the concept of employee sustainable performance has received considerable attention in the practitioner literature, academic research still lacks a clear conceptualization and empirical operationalization of this concept. Defining employee sustainable performance as a regulatory process in which an individual worker enduringly and efficiently achieves particular desired work goals while maintaining a satisfactory level of well-being, this paper describes a corresponding instrument called E-SuPer, and examines its psychometric properties. The E-SuPer instrument was tested and cross-validated using two cross-sectional survey studies ( n = 153 and n = 160), focusing on factorial validity, internal consistency, and discriminant and concurrent validity. Psychometric findings across the two samples revealed that the E-SuPer instrument consists of one general factor of ten items with good internal consistency. Discriminant validity and concurrent validity with other relevant constructs (task performance, counterproductive work behavior, and employee vitality) were also confirmed, showing promising results. Finally, theoretical and practical implications, as well as suggestions for future research, are outlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianchang Ji & Jan de Jonge & Maria C. W. Peeters & Toon W. Taris, 2021. "Employee Sustainable Performance (E-SuPer): Theoretical Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Psychometric Properties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10497-:d:650847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2010. "Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor," Research Papers 2017r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    3. Luc Dorenbosch, 2014. "Striking a Balance Between Work Effort and Resource Regeneration," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink (ed.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management, edition 127, pages 155-180, Springer.
    4. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    5. Gretchen Spreitzer & Kathleen Sutcliffe & Jane Dutton & Scott Sonenshein & Adam M. Grant, 2005. "A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 537-549, October.
    6. Linda Koopmans & Claire Bernaards & Vincent Hildebrandt & Stef van Buuren & Allard J. van der Beek & Henrica C.W. de Vet, 2013. "Development of an individual work performance questionnaire," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(1), pages 6-28, January.
    7. Jan de Jonge & Maria C.W. Peeters, 2019. "The Vital Worker: Towards Sustainable Performance at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-6, March.
    8. John Zelenski & Steven Murphy & David Jenkins, 2008. "The Happy-Productive Worker Thesis Revisited," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 521-537, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feiqiang Fu & Wenhui Zha & Qiwei Zhou, 2023. "The Impact of Enterprise Digital Capability on Employee Sustainable Performance: From the Perspective of Employee Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Ping Sun & Xiaoming Zhou & Cui Shao & Wenli Wang & Jinkun Sun, 2022. "The Impacts of Environmental Dynamism on Chinese Tour Guides’ Sustainable Performance: Factors Related to Vitality, Positive Stress Mindset and Supportive Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nada Alwahhabi & Suad Dukhaykh & Wadi B. Alonazi, 2023. "Thriving at Work as a Mediator of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Ghulam Abid & Francoise Contreras & Saira Ahmed & Tehmina Qazi, 2019. "Contextual Factors and Organizational Commitment: Examining the Mediating Role of Thriving at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Anselm Schneider, 2015. "Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 525-536, March.
    4. Le-Le Wang & Lan-Xia Zhang & Bin Ju, 2023. "Sustainable Vitality and Learning: The Connotation, Scale, and Heterogeneity of Dualistic Psychological Thriving at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    6. Christos Pitelis, 2013. "Towards a More ‘Ethically Correct’ Governance for Economic Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 655-665, December.
    7. De Prins, Peggy & Van Beirendonck, Lou & De Vos, Ans & Segers, Jesse, 2014. "Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the ‘Respect Openness Continuity (ROC)’-model," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 25(4), pages 263-284.
    8. Kozica, Arjan & Kaiser, Stephan, 2012. "A Sustainability Perspective on Flexible HRM: How to Cope with Paradoxes of Contingent Work," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(3), pages 239-261.
    9. Yang Qiu & Ming Lou & Li Zhang & Yiqin Wang, 2020. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior Motives and Thriving at Work: The Mediating Role of Citizenship Fatigue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Thomas Dolmark & Osama Sohaib & Ghassan Beydoun & Kai Wu, 2021. "The Effect of Individual’s Technological Belief and Usage on Their Absorptive Capacity towards Their Learning Behaviour in Learning Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Vickie Coleman Gallagher & Mary Wilson Hrivnak & Sorin Valcea & Christine Brown Mahoney & Diane LaWong, 2018. "A comprehensive three‐dimensional sustainability measure: The ‘missing P’ of ‘people’ – a vital stakeholder in sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 772-787, September.
    12. Jan de Jonge & Maria C.W. Peeters & Toon W. Taris, 2019. "Feeling Vital or Fatigued? Relations with Demands and Resources in a University Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Francisco Rincon‐Roldan & Alvaro Lopez‐Cabrales, 2021. "Ethical values in social economy for sustainable development," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 705-729, December.
    14. Beatrice I.J.M. Van der Heijden & Ans De Vos, 2015. "Sustainable careers: introductory chapter," Chapters, in: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Careers, chapter 1, pages 1-19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Erica L. Steckler & Sandra Waddock, 2018. "Self-Sustaining Practices of Successful Social Change Agents: A Retreats Framework for Supporting Transformational Change," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 171-198, February.
    16. Kalugala Vidanalage Aruna Shantha, 2019. "Individual Investors’ Learning Behavior and Its Impact on Their Herd Bias: An Integrated Analysis in the Context of Stock Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Jan de Jonge & Maria C.W. Peeters, 2019. "The Vital Worker: Towards Sustainable Performance at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-6, March.
    18. Sijia Guo & Xueqing Wang & Lipeng Fu & Yunfeng Liu, 2019. "How Individual’s Proactive Behavior Helps Construction Sustainability: Exploring the Effects of Project Citizenship Behavior on Project Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Irene Eleonora Lisi, 2018. "Determinants and Performance Effects of Social Performance Measurement Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 225-251, September.
    20. Jiang Min & Shuja Iqbal & Muhammad Aamir Shafique Khan & Shamim Akhtar & Farooq Anwar & Sikandar Ali Qalati, 2020. "Impact of supervisory behavior on sustainable employee performance: Mediation of conflict management strategies using PLS-SEM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10497-:d:650847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.