IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p192-d302430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Health Communication via Tik Tok Makes a Difference: A Content Analysis of Tik Tok Accounts Run by Chinese Provincial Health Committees

Author

Listed:
  • Chengyan Zhu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Xiaolin Xu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (School of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Jianmin Chen

    (School of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Richard Evans

    (College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK)

Abstract

During the last two decades, social media has immersed itself into all facets of our personal and professional lives. The healthcare sector is no exception, with public health departments now capitalizing on the benefits that social media offers when delivering healthcare education and communication with citizens. Provincial Health Committees (PHCs) in China have begun to adopt the micro-video sharing platform, Tik Tok, to engage with local residents and communicate health-related information. This study investigates the status quo of official Tik Tok accounts managed by PHCs in mainland China. In total, 31 PHC accounts were analyzed during August 2019, while the top 100 most liked micro-videos were examined using content analysis. Coding included three major aspects: Quantified Impact, Video Content, and Video Form. 45.2% (n = 14) of PHCs had official Tik Tok accounts. A limited number of accounts (n = 2) were yet to upload a micro-video, while most (n = 9) had uploaded their first micro-video during 2019. For the top 100 most liked micro-videos, a sharp difference was observed in terms of number of Likes, Comments and Reposts. Videos containing cartoons or documentary-style content were most frequently watched by citizens. Similarly, content that promoted professional health or provided knowledge of diseases was frequently viewed. Content containing original music, formal mandarin language, subtitles, and which lasted less than 60 s, were most frequently followed. It is considered a missed opportunity that most PHCs struggle to take advantage of the Tik Tok platform, especially given its growing popularity and daily increase in account creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengyan Zhu & Xiaolin Xu & Wei Zhang & Jianmin Chen & Richard Evans, 2019. "How Health Communication via Tik Tok Makes a Difference: A Content Analysis of Tik Tok Accounts Run by Chinese Provincial Health Committees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:192-:d:302430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dilaver Tengilimoglu & Nilgün Sarp & Cemre Eda Yar & Meral Bektaş & Mehmet Nil Hidir & Esin Korkmaz, 2017. "The consumers' social media use in choosing physicians and hospitals: the case study of the province of Izmir," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 19-35, January.
    2. Po-Chin Yang & Wui-Chiang Lee & Hao-Yen Liu & Mei-Ju Shih & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Li-Fang Chou & Shinn-Jang Hwang, 2018. "Use of Facebook by Hospitals in Taiwan: A Nationwide Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Deborah Agostino & Michela Arnaboldi, 2016. "A Measurement Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Social Media to Public Engagement: An empirical analysis on Facebook," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1289-1307, October.
    4. Ya-Chuan Hsu & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Feng-Yuan Chu & Hao-Yen Liu & Li-Fang Chou & Shinn-Jang Hwang, 2019. "Official Websites of Local Health Centers in Taiwan: A Nationwide Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brittany Ryder & Tingting Zhang & Nan Hua, 2021. "The Social Media “Magic”: Virtually Engaging Visitors during COVID-19 Temporary Closures," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Nathalie Nunes & Emma Björner & Knud Erik Hilding-Hamann, 2021. "Guidelines for Citizen Engagement and the Co-Creation of Nature-Based Solutions: Living Knowledge in the URBiNAT Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-37, December.
    3. Angela Chang & Xuechang Xian & Matthew Tingchi Liu & Xinshu Zhao, 2022. "Health Communication through Positive and Solidarity Messages Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Automated Content Analysis of Facebook Uses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Wang, Di & Lu, Jiahui & Zhong, Ying, 2023. "Futile or fertile? The effect of persuasive strategies on citizen engagement in COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets across six national health departments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    5. Andranik Tumasjan, 2024. "The many faces of social media in business and economics research: Taking stock of the literature and looking into the future," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 389-426, April.
    6. Dobre Florin & Popescu Maria Loredana & Pargaru Ion & Vatase Florin, 2024. "Use of Digital Media in the Public Sector," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 779-789.
    7. Al-Omoush, Khaled Saleh & Garrido, Rubén & Cañero, Julio, 2023. "The impact of government use of social media and social media contradictions on trust in government and citizens’ attitudes in times of crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Po-Chin Yang & Feng-Yuan Chu & Hao-Yen Liu & Mei-Ju Shih & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Li-Fang Chou & Shinn-Jang Hwang, 2019. "Features of Online Hospital Appointment Systems in Taiwan: A Nationwide Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, January.
    9. Afiq Izzudin A. Rahim & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Kamarul Imran Musa & Sook-Ling Chua, 2021. "Facebook Reviews as a Supplemental Tool for Hospital Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Hospital Accreditation in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Ya-Chuan Hsu & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Feng-Yuan Chu & Hao-Yen Liu & Li-Fang Chou & Shinn-Jang Hwang, 2019. "Official Websites of Local Health Centers in Taiwan: A Nationwide Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Ali, Maged & Azab, Nahed & Sorour, M. Karim & Dora, Manoj, 2019. "Integration v. polarisation among social media users: Perspectives through social capital theory on the recent Egyptian political landscape," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 461-473.
    12. Laurie Fraticelli & Colette Smentek & Delphine Tardivo & Julien Masson & Céline Clément & Sylvain Roy & Claude Dussart & Denis Bourgeois & Florence Carrouel, 2021. "Characterizing the Content Related to Oral Health Education on TikTok," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Afiq Izzudin A. Rahim & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Kamarul Imran Musa & Sook-Ling Chua & Najib Majdi Yaacob, 2021. "Assessing Patient-Perceived Hospital Service Quality and Sentiment in Malaysian Public Hospitals Using Machine Learning and Facebook Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Beniamino Schiavone & Andrea Vitale & Mena Gallo & Gianlucasalvatore Russo & Domenico Ponticelli & Mario Borrelli, 2021. "Overview of Facebook Use by Hospitals in Italy: A Nationwide Survey during the COVID-19 Emergency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Shilin Zheng & Mengdan Li, 2022. "Does aggressive tweeting by the government help to control the COVID‐19 outbreak? Evidence from China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 691-713, October.
    16. Pi-Chun Hsu & I-Hsiung Chang & Ru-Si Chen, 2019. "Online Learning Communities and Mental Health Literacy for Preschool Teachers: The Moderating Role of Enthusiasm for Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-9, November.
    17. Monika Meltzer & Lucrina Ștefănescu & Alexandru Ozunu, 2018. "Keep Them Engaged: Romanian County Inspectorates for Emergency Situations’ Facebook Usage for Disaster Risk Communication and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Jung, Sang Hoon & Jeong, Yong Jin, 2020. "Twitter data analytical methodology development for prediction of start-up firms’ social media marketing level," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Yi Yang & Wen Deng & Yi Zhang & Zijun Mao, 2020. "Promoting Public Engagement during the COVID-19 Crisis: How Effective Is the Wuhan Local Government’s Information Release?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Fang Xu & Meng Tian & Jie Yang & Guohu Xu, 2020. "Does Environmental Inspection Led by the Central Government Improve the Air Quality in China? The Moderating Role of Public Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:192-:d:302430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.