IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p118-d468729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting Public Engagement during the COVID-19 Crisis: How Effective Is the Wuhan Local Government’s Information Release?

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Yang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Wen Deng

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yi Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zijun Mao

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

During times of public crises (such as COVID-19), governments must act swiftly to release crisis information effectively and efficiently to the public. This paper provides a general overview of the way that the Wuhan local government use Weibo as a channel to engage with their citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the media richness, dialogic loop, and a series of theoretically relevant factors, such as content type, text length, and information source, we try to examine how citizen engage with their local government. By analyzing the data mining samples from Wuhan Release, the official Sina Weibo account of Wuhan’s local government, results show that, despite the unstable situation COVID-19 over the crisis, there exist three stages of a crisis on the whole. Combining the behavior of the government and the public, duration from 31 December 2019 to 19 January 2020 could be seen as the development period, then the outbreak period (30 January 2020 to 28 February 2020), and a grace period (29 February 2020 to19 April 2020). Public attention to different types of information changes over time, but curbing rumors has always been a priority. Media richness features partially influent citizen engagement. Text length is significantly positively associated with citizen engagement through government social media. However, posts containing information sources have a negative impact on citizen engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Yang & Wen Deng & Yi Zhang & Zijun Mao, 2020. "Promoting Public Engagement during the COVID-19 Crisis: How Effective Is the Wuhan Local Government’s Information Release?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:118-:d:468729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alejandro Sáez Martín & Arturo Haro de Rosario & María Del Carmen Caba Pérez, 2015. "Using Twitter for Dialogic Communication: Local Government Strategies in the European Union," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 421-444, May.
    2. Rongyang Ma & Zhaohua Deng & Manli Wu, 2020. "Effects of Health Information Dissemination on User Follows and Likes during COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Data and Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Ronald E. Rice & Douglas E. Shook, 1990. "Relationships Of Job Categories And Organizational Levels To Use Of Communication Channels, Including Electronic Mail: A Meta‐Analysis And Extension," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 195-229, March.
    4. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    5. Graves, O. Finley & Flesher, Dale L. & Jordan, Robert E., 1996. "Pictures and the bottom line: The television epistemology of U.S. annual reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 57-88, January.
    6. Suebvises, Ploy, 2018. "Social capital, citizen participation in public administration, and public sector performance in Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 236-248.
    7. King, Gary & Pan, Jennifer & Roberts, Margaret E., 2013. "How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(2), pages 326-343, May.
    8. Deborah Agostino & Michela Arnaboldi, 2016. "A Measurement Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Social Media to Public Engagement: An empirical analysis on Facebook," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1289-1307, October.
    9. Panagiotopoulos, Panos & Barnett, Julie & Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee & Sams, Steven, 2016. "Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 86-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wen Deng & Yi Yang, 2021. "Cross-Platform Comparative Study of Public Concern on Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study Based on Twitter and Weibo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wheeler, Patrick & Arunachalam, Vairam, 2009. "The effects of multimedia on cognitive aspects of decision-making," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 97-116.
    2. Spivack, April J. & Woodside, Arch G., 2019. "Applying complexity theory for modeling human resource outcomes: Antecedent configurations indicating perceived location autonomy and work environment choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 109-119.
    3. Yinan Wang & Yingchong Wang, 2022. "Developing Creative Leadership in the Use of Digital Communication Tools: A Psychological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Rebentisch, Eric., 1997. "The link between technology complexity and communication complexity in international technology transfer," Working papers 158-97. Working paper (Sl, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    5. Jonathan W. Palmer, 2002. "Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 151-167, June.
    6. Ned Kock, 2004. "The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 327-348, June.
    7. Nada Korac-Kakabadse & Alexander Kouzmin & Andrew Korac-Kakabadse, 2000. "Information Technology-Enabled Communication and Organizational Effectiveness," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 17-36, June.
    8. Brian E. Mennecke & Joseph S. Valacich & Bradley C. Wheeler, 2000. "The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(6), pages 507-529, November.
    9. Al-Omoush, Khaled Saleh & Garrido, Rubén & Cañero, Julio, 2023. "The impact of government use of social media and social media contradictions on trust in government and citizens’ attitudes in times of crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Jane Davison & Samantha Warren, 2009. "Imag[in]ing accounting and accountability," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(6), pages 845-857, July.
    11. Xu, Xiao-Yu & Jia, Qing-Dan & Tayyab, Syed Muhammad Usman, 2024. "Exploring the stimulating role of augmented reality features in E-commerce: A three-staged hybrid approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    13. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    14. Windsperger, Josef, 2001. "The fee structure in franchising: a property rights view," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 219-226, November.
    15. Yang, Jialiang & Li, Yaokuang & Calic, Goran & Shevchenko, Anton, 2020. "How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 6-18.
    16. Mahan, Joseph E. & Seo, Won Jae & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Funk, Daniel, 2015. "Exploring the impact of social networking sites on running involvement, running behavior, and social life satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-192.
    17. Chris Kimble & José Braga Vasconcelos & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1119-1130, December.
    18. van Riel, A.C.R. & Lievens, A., 2003. "New service development in high tech sectors: a decision making perspective," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    19. Sandra Wankmüller, 2023. "A comparison of approaches for imbalanced classification problems in the context of retrieving relevant documents for an analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 91-163, April.
    20. Linda Klebe Treviño & Jane Webster & Eric W. Stein, 2000. "Making Connections: Complementary Influences on Communication Media Choices, Attitudes, and Use," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 163-182, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:118-:d:468729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.