IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13260-d703752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing the Content Related to Oral Health Education on TikTok

Author

Listed:
  • Laurie Fraticelli

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Colette Smentek

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Delphine Tardivo

    (ADES UMR 7268, Aix-Marseille University, 13344 Marseille, France)

  • Julien Masson

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Céline Clément

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France
    “Interpsy” Laboratory, University of Lorraine, EA 4432, 54015 Nancy, France)

  • Sylvain Roy

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Claude Dussart

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Denis Bourgeois

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

  • Florence Carrouel

    (Health, Systemic, Process, UR 4129 Research Unit, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France)

Abstract

Neglecting oral hygiene in adolescents negatively affects dental caries and periodontal diseases, in addition to social and emotional well-being. Thus, the TikTok platform (ByteDance, Beijing, China)as a social media could be a powerful channel to provide health-related information and educational content. This study aims to assess the quality of the TikTok videos corresponding to #oralhealtheducation. Sixty-nine videos were identified. Three oral health professionals (OHP), three health education professionals (HEP), and ten of TikTok’s target audience watched and evaluated the videos from a qualitative questionnaire. OHP detected false or incorrect information in 11.6% (8/69) of the videos. At least two HEPs reported being unable to detect this type of content or whether the video met dental ethics standards in both the videos. Disagreement was observed among the professionals themselves. The evaluation indicated that TikTok’s target audience was satisfied with the products viewed with an average score of >2.5, unlike the professionals, whose average score was <2.5 on a scale of 0 to 5. Users are advised to think critically and to consider the content of TikTok oral health videos with caution. The involvement of health professionals in the writing and validation of the videos could be an added value to positively respond to the needs of the adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurie Fraticelli & Colette Smentek & Delphine Tardivo & Julien Masson & Céline Clément & Sylvain Roy & Claude Dussart & Denis Bourgeois & Florence Carrouel, 2021. "Characterizing the Content Related to Oral Health Education on TikTok," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13260-:d:703752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13260/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13260/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iole Vozza, 2021. "Oral Prevention and Management of Oral Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-3, February.
    2. Anqi Shen & Eduardo Bernabé & Wael Sabbah, 2021. "Systematic Review of Intervention Studies Aiming at Reducing Inequality in Dental Caries among Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-11, February.
    3. András Fehér & Miklós Véha & Henrietta Mónika Boros & Bence Kovács & Enikő Kontor & Zoltán Szakály, 2021. "The Relationship between Online and Offline Information-Seeking Behaviors for Healthy Nutrition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Deborah Agostino & Michela Arnaboldi, 2016. "A Measurement Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Social Media to Public Engagement: An empirical analysis on Facebook," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1289-1307, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali, Maged & Azab, Nahed & Sorour, M. Karim & Dora, Manoj, 2019. "Integration v. polarisation among social media users: Perspectives through social capital theory on the recent Egyptian political landscape," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 461-473.
    2. Brittany Ryder & Tingting Zhang & Nan Hua, 2021. "The Social Media “Magic”: Virtually Engaging Visitors during COVID-19 Temporary Closures," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Chengyan Zhu & Xiaolin Xu & Wei Zhang & Jianmin Chen & Richard Evans, 2019. "How Health Communication via Tik Tok Makes a Difference: A Content Analysis of Tik Tok Accounts Run by Chinese Provincial Health Committees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Nathalie Nunes & Emma Björner & Knud Erik Hilding-Hamann, 2021. "Guidelines for Citizen Engagement and the Co-Creation of Nature-Based Solutions: Living Knowledge in the URBiNAT Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-37, December.
    5. Wang, Di & Lu, Jiahui & Zhong, Ying, 2023. "Futile or fertile? The effect of persuasive strategies on citizen engagement in COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets across six national health departments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    6. Shilin Zheng & Mengdan Li, 2022. "Does aggressive tweeting by the government help to control the COVID‐19 outbreak? Evidence from China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 691-713, October.
    7. Monika Meltzer & Lucrina Ștefănescu & Alexandru Ozunu, 2018. "Keep Them Engaged: Romanian County Inspectorates for Emergency Situations’ Facebook Usage for Disaster Risk Communication and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Dobre Florin & Popescu Maria Loredana & Pargaru Ion & Vatase Florin, 2024. "Use of Digital Media in the Public Sector," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 779-789.
    9. Jung, Sang Hoon & Jeong, Yong Jin, 2020. "Twitter data analytical methodology development for prediction of start-up firms’ social media marketing level," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Al-Omoush, Khaled Saleh & Garrido, Rubén & Cañero, Julio, 2023. "The impact of government use of social media and social media contradictions on trust in government and citizens’ attitudes in times of crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Yi Yang & Wen Deng & Yi Zhang & Zijun Mao, 2020. "Promoting Public Engagement during the COVID-19 Crisis: How Effective Is the Wuhan Local Government’s Information Release?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Fang Xu & Meng Tian & Jie Yang & Guohu Xu, 2020. "Does Environmental Inspection Led by the Central Government Improve the Air Quality in China? The Moderating Role of Public Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13260-:d:703752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.