IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5813-d1108637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study

Author

Listed:
  • M. Devendran Manogaran

    (HICoE-Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute for Self-Sustainable Building (ISB), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
    Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Hakimi

    (HICoE-Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute for Self-Sustainable Building (ISB), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
    Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Harith Nizam Basheer Ahmad

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Rashid Shamsuddin

    (HICoE-Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute for Self-Sustainable Building (ISB), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
    Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Jun Wei Lim

    (HICoE-Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute for Self-Sustainable Building (ISB), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
    Fundamental and Applied Sciences Department, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
    Department of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 602105, India)

  • Muzamil Abdalla M Hassan

    (HICoE-Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute for Self-Sustainable Building (ISB), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Nurul Tasnim Sahrin

    (HICoE-Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute for Self-Sustainable Building (ISB), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
    Fundamental and Applied Sciences Department, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia)

Abstract

The rapid growth of the Malaysian poultry and palm oil industries has led biomass waste generation in abundance specifically chicken manure and empty fruit bunch (EFB). Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a circular economy-based approach which converts chicken manure and EFB into biogas which can be utilized for heating and power generation. Operating temperature is an imperative consideration for AD hence the objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of different temperature profiles namely, psychrophilic (20 °C), mesophilic (35 °C) and thermophilic (50 °C) on AD of chicken manure and EFB. The kinetic parameters are also evaluated using five kinetic models to enable readers to comprehend the kinetic behaviours of the systems. The volume and composition of biogas is measured every five days for a 50-day retention time. The findings observed that mesophilic condition is the most favourable with cumulative methane, CH 4 composition of up to 17.07%, almost two folds that of thermophilic (9.12%) and five folds that of psychrophilic (3.49%). The CH 4 generation rate, R b based on the modified Gompertz model which is deemed the best fit further supports these findings as the R b under mesophilic condition is significantly higher (0.330 mL/g vs day) compared to psychrophilic (0.088 mL/g vs day) and thermophilic (0.120 mL/g vs day) conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Devendran Manogaran & Mohd Hakimi & Mohammad Harith Nizam Basheer Ahmad & Rashid Shamsuddin & Jun Wei Lim & Muzamil Abdalla M Hassan & Nurul Tasnim Sahrin, 2023. "Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5813-:d:1108637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Ziyi & Wang, Wen & He, Yanfeng & Zhang, Ruihong & Liu, Guangqing, 2018. "Effect of ammonia on methane production, methanogenesis pathway, microbial community and reactor performance under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 915-925.
    2. Bi, Shaojie & Qiao, Wei & Xiong, Linpeng & Ricci, Marina & Adani, Fabrizio & Dong, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 242-250.
    3. Matheri, A.N. & Ndiweni, S.N. & Belaid, M. & Muzenda, E. & Hubert, R., 2017. "Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 756-764.
    4. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    5. Aakash Khadka & Anmol Parajuli & Sheila Dangol & Bijay Thapa & Lokesh Sapkota & Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Anish Ghimire, 2022. "Effect of the Substrate to Inoculum Ratios on the Kinetics of Biogas Production during the Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Izabela Konkol & Lesław Świerczek & Adam Cenian, 2023. "Chicken Manure Pretreatment for Enhancing Biogas and Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    3. Xiao, Youqian & Yang, Hongnan & Zheng, Dan & Liu, Yi & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Alleviation of ammonia inhibition in dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    4. Fei Wang & Mengfu Pei & Ling Qiu & Yiqing Yao & Congguang Zhang & Hong Qiang, 2019. "Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Song, Yapeng & Hu, Wanrong & Qiao, Wei & Westerholm, Maria & Wandera, Simon M. & Dong, Renjie, 2022. "Upgrading the performance of high solids feeding anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under extremely high ammonia level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-20.
    6. Bi, Shaojie & Westerholm, Maria & Hu, Wanrong & Mahdy, Ahmed & Dong, Taili & Sun, Yingcai & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "The metabolic performance and microbial communities of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under stressed ammonia condition: A case study of a 10-year successful biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 644-651.
    7. Yapeng Song & Wei Qiao & Jiahao Zhang & Renjie Dong, 2023. "Process Performance and Functional Microbial Community in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Zhang, Le & Loh, Kai-Chee & Lim, Jun Wei & Zhang, Jingxin, 2019. "Bioinformatics analysis of metagenomics data of biogas-producing microbial communities in anaerobic digesters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 110-126.
    9. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Tomasz Kulupa & Adrianna Kubiak & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Krzysztof Pilarski & Alicja Niewiadomska, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste—A Short Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    11. Huayong Zhang & Di An & Yudong Cao & Yonglan Tian & Jinxian He, 2021. "Modeling the Methane Production Kinetics of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Wastes Using Sigmoidal Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2024. "A solar-assisted liquefied biomethane production by anaerobic digestion: Dynamic simulations for harbors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    13. Saha, Chayan Kumer & Nandi, Rajesh & Akter, Shammi & Hossain, Samira & Kabir, Kazi Bayzid & Kirtania, Kawnish & Islam, Md Tahmid & Guidugli, Laura & Reza, M. Toufiq & Alam, Md Monjurul, 2024. "Technical prospects and challenges of anaerobic co-digestion in Bangladesh: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Carmen Bartolomé & Clara A. Jarauta-Córdoba, 2023. "The Role of Biogas and Biomethane as Renewable Gases in the Decarbonization Pathway to Zero Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-3, August.
    15. Anna Jasińska & Anna Grosser & Erik Meers, 2023. "Possibilities and Limitations of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Animal Manure—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, May.
    16. Shitophyta Lukhi Mulia & Arnita Arnita & Wulansari Hilda Dyah Ana, 2023. "Evaluation and modelling of biogas production from batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover with oxalic acid," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(3), pages 151-157.
    17. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Regimantas Dauknys & Aušra Mažeikienė, 2023. "Process Improvement of Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge Applying Iron Oxides-Based Additives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Zhou, Man & Li, Cheng & Ni, Fuquan & Chen, Anjun & Li, Meiliang & Shen, Guanghui & Deng, Yu & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Packed activated carbon particles triggered a more robust syntrophic pathway for acetate oxidation-hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis at extremely high ammonia concentrations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 305-317.
    20. Amal Babu Puthumana & Prasad Kaparaju, 2024. "Impact of Organic Load on Methane Yields and Kinetics during Anaerobic Digestion of Sugarcane Bagasse: Optimal Feed-to-Inoculum Ratio and Total Solids of Reactor Working Volume," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5813-:d:1108637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.