IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i4p415-d95780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lunch Salad Bars in New Orleans’ Middle and High Schools: Student Intake of Fruit and Vegetables

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn C. Johnson

    (Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA)

  • Leann Myers

    (Department of Global Biostatistics and Informatics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA)

  • Adrienne R. Mundorf

    (Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA)

  • Keelia O’Malley

    (Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA)

  • Lori Andersen Spruance

    (Department of Health Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Diane M. Harris

    (Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA)

Abstract

The school lunch salad bar (SB) is a recommended food environmental strategy to increase access to, and consumption of fruit and vegetables (F/V). In a study to examine use of school lunch SBs, middle and high school students provided data via the Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall (24HDR) tool for kids (ASA24-Kids-2012), a web-based data collection platform. Kilocalories were computed, food groups were assigned and F/V sources were obtained. Students (n = 718) from 12 schools with SBs and nine schools without SBs were approximately 87% African American, over 64% female and most were 7th and 8th graders. SB school students had higher median energy consumption at lunch but a higher percent of non-SB students reported eating fruit at lunch compared to SB students. Most students reporting eating F/V at lunch obtained F/V from the cafeteria main line; only 19.6% reported eating F/V exclusively from the SB. In SB schools median intake of cups F/V was higher among students using the SB (0.92) compared to those not using the SB (0.53). Results of this study are mixed, but encouraging. Additional factors, e.g., nutrition education, marketing, and kinds of foods offered on the SB need to be examined for potential influence on SB use.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn C. Johnson & Leann Myers & Adrienne R. Mundorf & Keelia O’Malley & Lori Andersen Spruance & Diane M. Harris, 2017. "Lunch Salad Bars in New Orleans’ Middle and High Schools: Student Intake of Fruit and Vegetables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:415-:d:95780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/415/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/415/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronette R. Briefel & Ander Wilson & Philip M. Gleason, 2009. "Consumption of Low-Nutrient Energy-Dense Foods and Beverages at School Home and Other Locations Among School Lunch Participants and Nonparticipants," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 461c53197c444572b13a4f215, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:6161 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishdorj, Ariun & Crepinsek, Mary Kay & Jensen, Helen H., 2012. "Children’s Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables: Do School Environment and Policies Affect Choice in School Meals?," 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium 123534, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Ariun Ishdorj & Mary Kay Crepinsek & Helen H. Jensen, 2013. "Children's Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables: Do School Environment and Policies Affect Choices at School and Away from School?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 35(2), pages 341-359.
    3. Neha Rathi & Lynn Riddell & Anthony Worsley, 2018. "Parents’ and Teachers’ Views of Food Environments and Policies in Indian Private Secondary Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Rebecca Pera & Giampaolo Viglia, 2017. "Can snacking be healthy? A comparison between coeliacs and health conscious food consumers," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 79-99.
    5. Ralston, Katherine & Treen, Katie & Coleman-Jensen, Alisha & Guthrie, Joanne, 2017. "Children’s Food Security and USDA Child Nutrition Programs," Economic Information Bulletin 259730, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Newman, Constance, 2013. "Fruit and Vegetable Consumption by School Lunch Participants: Implications for the Success of New Nutrition Standards," Economic Research Report 262220, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Miller, Gabrielle F. & Gupta, Sonam & Kropp, Jaclyn D. & Grogan, Kelly A. & Mathews, Anne, 2016. "The effects of pre-ordering and behavioral nudges on National School Lunch Program participants’ food item selection," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 4-16.
    8. Siwan Song & Ariun Ishdorj & Jayna M. Dave, 2021. "Gender Differences in Nutritional Quality and Consumption of Lunches Brought from Home to School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Kristin Kiesel & Mengxin Ji, 2021. "Did state‐mandated restrictions on sugar‐sweetened drinks in California high schools increase soda purchases in school neighborhoods?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1443-1475, December.
    10. Bonanno, Alessandro & Mendis, Sachintha S., 2021. "Too cool for farm to school? Analyzing the determinants of farm to school programming continuation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Sarah Bardin & Liana Washburn & Elizabeth Gearan, "undated". "Disparities in the Healthfulness of School Food Environments and the Nutritional Quality of School Lunches," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4b0e2563a3974cab85e0d6b78, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. Marina B. Kotova & Sergey A. Maksimov & Oksana M. Drapkina, 2022. "Gender, Age, Family and Territorial Features of Dietary and Physical Activity Patterns in Russian Youths," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Gabrielyan, Gnel & Hanks, Drew S. & Hoy, Kathryn & Just, David R. & Wansink, Brian, 2017. "Who’s adopting the smarter lunchroom approach? Individual characteristics of innovative food service directors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 72-80.
    14. Kristen Capogrossi & Wen You, 2017. "The Influence of School Nutrition Programs on the Weight of Low‐Income Children: A Treatment Effect Analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(8), pages 980-1000, August.
    15. Gao, Xiang & Ishdorj, Ariun & Higgins, Lindsey M., 2012. "Impact of the National School Lunch Program on Children’s Food Security," 2012 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama 119778, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Levay, Adrienne V. & Chapman, Gwen E. & Seed, Barbara & Wittman, Hannah, 2018. "It’s just the right thing to do: Conceptualizing a theory of change for a school food and beverage sales environment interv ention and implications for implementation evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 73-82.
    17. Gillespie, Jeffrey & Hatzenbuehler, Patrick & O'Neil, Carol & Lin, Bo & Niu, Huizhen, 2015. "The Impact of Neighborhood Income on the Cost of Energy-Dense and Nutrient-Dense Foods in Supermarkets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 46(3), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Capogrossi, Kristen & You, Wen, 2013. "National School Lunch Program Menus: A Moral Hazard Problem," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149701, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:415-:d:95780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.