IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i10p4251-d1152856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of PI Controller Parameters by GWO Algorithm for Five-Phase Asynchronous Motor

Author

Listed:
  • Malika Fodil

    (LASS, Laboratoire d’Analyse des and nd Gnaux et Systemes, University Mohamed Boudiaf of M’Sila, M’Sila 28000, Algeria)

  • Ali Djerioui

    (LGE, Laboratoire de Genie Electrique, University Mohamed Boudiaf of M’Sila, M’Sila 28000, Algeria)

  • Mohamed Ladjal

    (LASS, Laboratoire d’Analyse des and nd Gnaux et Systemes, University Mohamed Boudiaf of M’Sila, M’Sila 28000, Algeria)

  • Abdelhakim Saim

    (IREENA Laboratory, University of Nantes, 44600 Saint-Nazaire, France)

  • Fouad Berrabah

    (LGE, Laboratoire de Genie Electrique, University Mohamed Boudiaf of M’Sila, M’Sila 28000, Algeria)

  • Hemza Mekki

    (LGE, Laboratoire de Genie Electrique, University Mohamed Boudiaf of M’Sila, M’Sila 28000, Algeria)

  • Samir Zeghlache

    (LASS, Laboratoire d’Analyse des and nd Gnaux et Systemes, University Mohamed Boudiaf of M’Sila, M’Sila 28000, Algeria)

  • Azeddine Houari

    (IREENA Laboratory, University of Nantes, 44600 Saint-Nazaire, France)

  • Mohamed Fouad Benkhoris

    (IREENA Laboratory, University of Nantes, 44600 Saint-Nazaire, France)

Abstract

Operation at low speed and high torque can lead to the generation of strong ripples in the speed, which can deteriorate the system. To reduce the speed oscillations when operating a five-phase asynchronous motor at low speed, in this article, we propose a control method based on Gray Wolf optimization (GWO) algorithms to adjust the parameters of proportional–integral (PI) controllers. Proportional–integral controllers are commonly used in control systems to regulate the speed and current of a motor. The controller parameters, such as the integral gain and proportional gain, can be adjusted to improve the control performance. Specifically, reducing the integral gain can help reduce the oscillations at low speeds. The proportional–integral controller is insensitive to parametric variations; however, when we employ a GWO optimization strategy based on PI controller parameters, and when we choose gains wisely, the system becomes more reliable. The obtained results show that the hybrid control of the five-phase induction motor (IM) offers high performance in the permanent and transient states. In addition, with this proposed strategy controller, disturbances do not affect motor performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Malika Fodil & Ali Djerioui & Mohamed Ladjal & Abdelhakim Saim & Fouad Berrabah & Hemza Mekki & Samir Zeghlache & Azeddine Houari & Mohamed Fouad Benkhoris, 2023. "Optimization of PI Controller Parameters by GWO Algorithm for Five-Phase Asynchronous Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4251-:d:1152856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali, Ehab S., 2015. "Speed control of induction motor supplied by wind turbine via Imperialist Competitive Algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 593-600.
    2. Kalim Ullah & Quanyuan Jiang & Guangchao Geng & Sahar Rahim & Rehan Ali Khan, 2022. "Optimal Power Sharing in Microgrids Using the Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Abdelmalek Gacem & Djilani Benattous, 2017. "Hybrid GA–PSO for optimal placement of static VAR compensators in power system," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 247-254, January.
    4. Ali Djerioui & Azeddine Houari & Mohamed Machmoum & Malek Ghanes, 2020. "Grey Wolf Optimizer-Based Predictive Torque Control for Electric Buses Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Mohammed H. Qais & Hany M. Hasanien & Rania A. Turky & Saad Alghuwainem & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & Francisco Jurado, 2022. "Circle Search Algorithm: A Geometry-Based Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Garg, Harish, 2016. "A hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 274(C), pages 292-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Abdel-Basset & Reda Mohamed & Karam M. Sallam & Ripon K. Chakrabortty, 2022. "Light Spectrum Optimizer: A Novel Physics-Inspired Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-63, September.
    2. Ghareeb Moustafa & Ali M. El-Rifaie & Idris H. Smaili & Ahmed Ginidi & Abdullah M. Shaheen & Ahmed F. Youssef & Mohamed A. Tolba, 2023. "An Enhanced Dwarf Mongoose Optimization Algorithm for Solving Engineering Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Mohamed A. M. Shaheen & Zia Ullah & Mohammed H. Qais & Hany M. Hasanien & Kian J. Chua & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & Rania A. Turky & Francisco Jurado & Mohamed R. Elkadeem, 2022. "Solution of Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Incorporating Renewable Energy Uncertainty Using a Novel Circle Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Taha Selim Ustun, 2022. "Power Systems Imitate Nature for Improved Performance Use of Nature-Inspired Optimization Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-2, August.
    5. Adane Abebaw Gessesse & Rajashree Mishra & Mitali Madhumita Acharya & Kedar Nath Das, 2020. "Genetic algorithm based fuzzy programming approach for multi-objective linear fractional stochastic transportation problem involving four-parameter Burr distribution," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 93-109, February.
    6. Mahdy, Ahmed & Hasanien, Hany M. & Helmy, Waleed & Turky, Rania A. & Abdel Aleem, Shady H.E., 2022. "Transient stability improvement of wave energy conversion systems connected to power grid using anti-windup-coot optimization strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    7. Slim Abid & Ali M. El-Rifaie & Mostafa Elshahed & Ahmed R. Ginidi & Abdullah M. Shaheen & Ghareeb Moustafa & Mohamed A. Tolba, 2023. "Development of Slime Mold Optimizer with Application for Tuning Cascaded PD-PI Controller to Enhance Frequency Stability in Power Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-32, April.
    8. Yassin Belkourchia & Mohamed Zeriab Es-Sadek & Lahcen Azrar, 2023. "New Hybrid Perturbed Projected Gradient and Simulated Annealing Algorithms for Global Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 438-475, May.
    9. Touqeer Ahmed Jumani & Mohd Wazir Mustafa & Nawaf N. Hamadneh & Samer H. Atawneh & Madihah Md. Rasid & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Muhammad Akram Bhayo & Ilyas Khan, 2020. "Computational Intelligence-Based Optimization Methods for Power Quality and Dynamic Response Enhancement of ac Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Li, Chao & Zhai, Rongrong & Yang, Yongping & Patchigolla, Kumar & Oakey, John E. & Turner, Peter, 2019. "Annual performance analysis and optimization of a solar tower aided coal-fired power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 440-456.
    11. Brayan A. Atoccsa & David W. Puma & Daygord Mendoza & Estefany Urday & Cristhian Ronceros & Modesto T. Palma, 2024. "Optimization of Ampacity in High-Voltage Underground Cables with Thermal Backfill Using Dynamic PSO and Adaptive Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Luo, Qifang & Yang, Xiao & Zhou, Yongquan, 2019. "Nature-inspired approach: An enhanced moth swarm algorithm for global optimization," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 57-92.
    13. Ahmet Selim Pehlivan & Beste Bahceci & Kemalettin Erbatur, 2022. "Genetically Optimized Pitch Angle Controller of a Wind Turbine with Fuzzy Logic Design Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Upasana Lakhina & Nasreen Badruddin & Irraivan Elamvazuthi & Ajay Jangra & Truong Hoang Bao Huy & Josep M. Guerrero, 2023. "An Enhanced Multi-Objective Optimizer for Stochastic Generation Optimization in Islanded Renewable Energy Microgrids," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Xiang, Shihu & Yang, Jun, 2023. "A novel adaptive deployment method for the single-target tracking of mobile wireless sensor networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    16. Yan, Zheping & Zhang, Jinzhong & Zeng, Jia & Tang, Jialing, 2021. "Nature-inspired approach: An enhanced whale optimization algorithm for global optimization," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 17-46.
    17. Máximo Méndez & Mariano Frutos & Fabio Miguel & Ricardo Aguasca-Colomo, 2020. "TOPSIS Decision on Approximate Pareto Fronts by Using Evolutionary Algorithms: Application to an Engineering Design Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Aqsa Naeem & Naveed Ul Hassan & Chau Yuen & S. M. Muyeen, 2019. "Maximizing the Economic Benefits of a Grid-Tied Microgrid Using Solar-Wind Complementarity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Ahmed A. Ewees & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness & Laith Abualigah & Diego Oliva & Zakariya Yahya Algamal & Ahmed M. Anter & Rehab Ali Ibrahim & Rania M. Ghoniem & Mohamed Abd Elaziz, 2021. "Boosting Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm with Genetic Algorithm Operators for Feature Selection: Case Study on Cox Proportional Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Maissa Tamraz & Yaming Yang, 2017. "Price Optimisation for New Business," Papers 1711.07753, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4251-:d:1152856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.