IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i1p282-d715926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Power Capture and Wake Characteristics of a Wind Turbine Based on a Modified Actuator Line Model

Author

Listed:
  • Feifei Xue

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Xikang Road 1, Nanjing 210098, China
    Postal Address: No. 1 Xikang Road, Nanjing 210098, China.)

  • Heping Duan

    (Zhejiang Windey Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310012, China)

  • Chang Xu

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Xikang Road 1, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Xingxing Han

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Xikang Road 1, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Yanqing Shangguan

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Hohai Road 5, Changzhou 231000, China)

  • Tongtong Li

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Xikang Road 1, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Zhefei Fen

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Xikang Road 1, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

On a wind farm, the wake has an important impact on the performance of the wind turbines. For example, the wake of an upstream wind turbine affects the blade load and output power of the downstream wind turbine. In this paper, a modified actuator line model with blade tips, root loss, and an airfoil three-dimensional delayed stall was revised. This full-scale modified actuator line model with blades, nacelles, and towers, was combined with a Large Eddy Simulation, and then applied and validated based on an analysis of wind turbine wakes in wind farms. The modified actuator line model was verified using an experimental wind turbine. Subsequently, numerical simulations were conducted on two NREL 5 MW wind turbines with different staggered spacing to study the effect of the staggered spacing on the characteristics of wind turbines. The results show that the output power of the upstream turbine stabilized at 5.9 MW, and the output power of the downstream turbine increased. When the staggered spacing is R and 1.5R, both the power and thrust of the downstream turbine are severely reduced. However, the length of the peaks was significantly longer, which resulted in a long-term unstable power output. As the staggered spacing increased, the velocity in the central near wake of the downstream turbine also increased, and the recovery speed at the threshold of the wake slowed down. The modified actuator line model described herein can be used for the numerical simulation of wakes in wind farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Feifei Xue & Heping Duan & Chang Xu & Xingxing Han & Yanqing Shangguan & Tongtong Li & Zhefei Fen, 2022. "Research on the Power Capture and Wake Characteristics of a Wind Turbine Based on a Modified Actuator Line Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:282-:d:715926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fredriksson, Sam T. & Broström, Göran & Bergqvist, Björn & Lennblad, Johan & Nilsson, Håkan, 2021. "Modelling Deep Green tidal power plant using large eddy simulations and the actuator line method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1140-1155.
    2. Kim, Taewoo & Oh, Sejong & Yee, Kwanjung, 2015. "Improved actuator surface method for wind turbine application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 16-26.
    3. Qian, Yaoru & Wang, Tongguang & Yuan, Yiping & Zhang, Yuquan, 2020. "Comparative study on wind turbine wakes using a modified partially-averaged Navier-Stokes method and large eddy simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Hyun-Goo Kim & Jin-Young Kim, 2021. "Analysis of Wind Turbine Aging through Operation Data Calibrated by LiDAR Measurement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Crespo, 2023. "Computational Fluid Dynamic Models of Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-3, February.
    2. Liu, Songyue & Li, Qiusheng & Lu, Bin & He, Junyi, 2024. "Impact of incoming turbulence intensity and turbine spacing on output power density: A study with two 5MW offshore wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    3. Victor P. Stein & Hans-Jakob Kaltenbach, 2022. "Validation of a Large-Eddy Simulation Approach for Prediction of the Ground Roughness Influence on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Yiyang Sun & Xiangwen Wang & Junjie Yang, 2022. "Modified Particle Swarm Optimization with Attention-Based LSTM for Wind Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2024. "A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Wumaier Tuerxun & Chang Xu & Hongyu Guo & Lei Guo & Namei Zeng & Yansong Gao, 2022. "A Wind Power Forecasting Model Using LSTM Optimized by the Modified Bald Eagle Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Hongliang & Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Guangxing & Du, Bowen & Liu, Yongqian, 2021. "Formulas of the optimized yaw angles for cooperative control of wind farms with aligned turbines to maximize the power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    2. Ge, Mingwei & Gayme, Dennice F. & Meneveau, Charles, 2021. "Large-eddy simulation of wind turbines immersed in the wake of a cube-shaped building," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1063-1077.
    3. Lapa, Gabriel Vicentin Pereira & Gay Neto, Alfredo & Franzini, Guilherme Rosa, 2023. "Effects of blade torsion on IEA 15MW turbine rotor operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    4. Xin Liu & Lailong Li & Shaoping Shi & Xinming Chen & Songhua Wu & Wenxin Lao, 2021. "Three-Dimensional LiDAR Wake Measurements in an Offshore Wind Farm and Comparison with Gaussian and AL Wake Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zhang, Huan & Ge, Mingwei & Liu, Yongqian & Yang, Xiang I.A., 2021. "A new coupled model for the equivalent roughness heights of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 34-46.
    6. Davide Astolfi & Ravi Pandit, 2022. "Wind Turbine Performance Decline with Age," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-4, July.
    7. Eidi, Ali & Ghiassi, Reza & Yang, Xiang & Abkar, Mahdi, 2021. "Model-form uncertainty quantification in RANS simulations of wakes and power losses in wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2212-2223.
    8. Davide Astolfi & Francesco Castellani, 2022. "Editorial on the Special Issue “Wind Turbine Monitoring through Operation Data Analysis”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-4, May.
    9. Dongmyoung Kim & Taesu Jeon & Insu Paek & Daeyoung Kim, 2022. "A Study on Available Power Estimation Algorithm and Its Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Angelo Algieri & Pietropaolo Morrone & Sergio Bova, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuel, Solar and Wind Multi-Source Small-Scale CHP Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Zhaobin Li & Xiaohao Liu & Xiaolei Yang, 2022. "Review of Turbine Parameterization Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    12. Erik Möllerström & Sean Gregory & Aromal Sugathan, 2021. "Improvement of AEP Predictions with Time for Swedish Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Pim van der Male & Marco Vergassola & Karel N. van Dalen, 2020. "Decoupled Modelling Approaches for Environmental Interactions with Monopile-Based Offshore Wind Support Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-35, October.
    14. Amini, Shayesteh & Golzarian, Mahmood Reza & Mahmoodi, Esmail & Jeromin, Andres & Abbaspour-Fard, Mohammad Hossein, 2021. "Numerical simulation of the Mexico wind turbine using the actuator disk model along with the 3D correction of aerodynamic coefficients in OpenFOAM," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2029-2036.
    15. Davide Astolfi & Ravi Pandit & Ludovico Terzi & Andrea Lombardi, 2022. "Discussion of Wind Turbine Performance Based on SCADA Data and Multiple Test Case Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Fan, Xiantao & Ge, Mingwei & Tan, Wei & Li, Qi, 2021. "Impacts of coexisting buildings and trees on the performance of rooftop wind turbines: An idealized numerical study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 164-180.
    17. Wang, Lin & Liu, Xiongwei & Kolios, Athanasios, 2016. "State of the art in the aeroelasticity of wind turbine blades: Aeroelastic modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 195-210.
    18. Ye, Maokun & Chen, Hamn-Ching & Koop, Arjen, 2023. "High-fidelity CFD simulations for the wake characteristics of the NTNU BT1 wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    19. Dong, Guodan & Li, Zhaobin & Qin, Jianhua & Yang, Xiaolei, 2022. "Predictive capability of actuator disk models for wakes of different wind turbine designs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 269-281.
    20. Paxis Marques João Roque & Shyama Pada Chowdhury & Zhongjie Huan, 2021. "Performance Enhancement of Proposed Namaacha Wind Farm by Minimising Losses Due to the Wake Effect: A Mozambican Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:282-:d:715926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.