IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5692-d881184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transport Preferences of City Residents in the Context of Urban Mobility and Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Eliza Wolnowska

    (Faculty of Economics and Transport Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Lech Kasyk

    (Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

The article focuses on the transport preferences of the inhabitants of a medium-sized city in the context of changing urban mobility and sustainable development. It fills the gap in the literature researching the changing communication behavior of the inhabitants of a given city. The main purpose of this article is to identify and analyze the preferred means of movement for inhabitants of a medium-sized city in Central and Eastern Europe. The research area was the city of Szczecin, Poland. The research was carried out using the following research methods: literature review, analysis of legal acts and documents, case study. The research material was collected using an anonymous questionnaire based on a proprietary survey made available to the inhabitants of the largest city of north-western Poland, Szczecin, in the GOOGLE browser in the period 17 May 2019–1 April 2021. The multiple-response contingency tables, chi-square test of independence and non-parametric U Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for study development. The conducted scientific research showed that, when determining the relationship between the method and the destination, the respondents most often chose a car or on-foot commuting in all of the surveyed destinations. The research results increase the level of knowledge regarding residents’ needs in terms of urban mobility and the development of Szczecin’s transport system. They can be used in the rational actions of local authorities aiming to improve residents’ the quality of life in the context of the sustainable development of city transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Eliza Wolnowska & Lech Kasyk, 2022. "Transport Preferences of City Residents in the Context of Urban Mobility and Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-32, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5692-:d:881184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Karol Żarski, 2021. "Bicycle Traffic Model for Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-36, September.
    2. Andreasen, Manja Hoppe & Møller-Jensen, Lasse, 2017. "Access to the city: Mobility patterns, transport and accessibility in peripheral settlements of Dar es Salaam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 20-29.
    3. Neves, Andre & Brand, Christian, 2019. "Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel diary approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 130-146.
    4. Ruben Cordera & Pierluigi Coppola & Luigi dell’Olio & Ángel Ibeas, 2017. "Is accessibility relevant in trip generation? Modelling the interaction between trip generation and accessibility taking into account spatial effects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1577-1603, November.
    5. Aleksandra Lewandowska & Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk & Krzysztof Rogatka & Tomasz Starczewski, 2020. "Smart Energy in a Smart City: Utopia or Reality? Evidence from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Fiorio, Carlo V. & Florio, Massimo & Perucca, Giovanni, 2013. "User satisfaction and the organization of local public transport: Evidence from European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 209-218.
    7. Wadud, Zia & MacKenzie, Don & Leiby, Paul, 2016. "Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-18.
    8. Romanika Okraszewska & Aleksandra Romanowska & Marcin Wołek & Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Kazimierz Jamroz, 2018. "Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Wissam Qassim Al-Salih & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2021. "Linking Mode Choice with Travel Behavior by Using Logit Model Based on Utility Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Oliwia Pietrzak & Krystian Pietrzak, 2021. "The Economic Effects of Electromobility in Sustainable Urban Public Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, February.
    11. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    12. Radosław Korneć, 2020. "The role of stakeholders in shaping smart solutions in Polish cities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1981-1995, March.
    13. Jeffery B. Greenblatt & Samveg Saxena, 2015. "Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(9), pages 860-863, September.
    14. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E. & Hawken, Scott & Sargolzaei, Sharifeh & Foroozanfa, Mona, 2019. "Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-116.
    15. Anna E. Wolnowska & Lech Kasyk, 2021. "Ways Residents of Large Cities in Poland, Commute before and during the Covid-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 749-768.
    16. Gaspare D’Amico & Roberta Arbolino & Lei Shi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Digital Technologies for Urban Metabolism Efficiency: Lessons from Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Vij, Akshay & Carrel, André & Walker, Joan L., 2013. "Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 164-178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin-Wei Li & Hong-Zhi Miao, 2023. "How to Incorporate Autonomous Vehicles into the Carbon Neutrality Framework of China: Legal and Policy Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Jia Guo & Yusak Susilo & Constantinos Antoniou & Anna Pernestål Brenden, 2020. "Influence of Individual Perceptions on the Decision to Adopt Automated Bus Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Moneim Massar & Imran Reza & Syed Masiur Rahman & Sheikh Muhammad Habib Abdullah & Arshad Jamal & Fahad Saleh Al-Ismail, 2021. "Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles on Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Positive or Negative?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Sergey Naumov & David R. Keith & Charles H. Fine, 2020. "Unintended Consequences of Automated Vehicles and Pooling for Urban Transportation Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1354-1371, May.
    5. Roberto Battistini & Luca Mantecchini & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2020. "Users’ Acceptance of Connected and Automated Shuttles for Tourism Purposes: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Max Luke & Priyanshi Somani & Turner Cotterman & Dhruv Suri & Stephen J. Lee, 2020. "No COVID-19 Climate Silver Lining in the US Power Sector," Papers 2008.06660, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    7. Jacek Oskarbski & Konrad Biszko, 2022. "Estimation of Vehicle Energy Consumption at Intersections Using Microscopic Traffic Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, December.
    8. Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Karol Żarski, 2021. "Bicycle Traffic Model for Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-36, September.
    9. Long T. Truong & Chris Gruyter & Graham Currie & Alexa Delbosc, 2017. "Estimating the trip generation impacts of autonomous vehicles on car travel in Victoria, Australia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1279-1292, November.
    10. Scott B. Kelley & Bradley W. Lane & John M. DeCicco, 2019. "Pumping the Brakes on Robot Cars: Current Urban Traveler Willingness to Consider Driverless Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Nunes, Ashley & Hernandez, Kristen D., 2020. "Autonomous taxis & public health: High cost or high opportunity cost?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 28-36.
    12. Mulrow, John & Derrible, Sybil & Samaras, Constantine, 2019. "Sociotechnical convex hulls and the evolution of transportation activity: A method and application to US travel survey data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Iacobucci, Riccardo & McLellan, Benjamin & Tezuka, Tetsuo, 2018. "Modeling shared autonomous electric vehicles: Potential for transport and power grid integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 148-163.
    14. Taiebat, Morteza & Stolper, Samuel & Xu, Ming, 2019. "Forecasting the Impact of Connected and Automated Vehicles on Energy Use: A Microeconomic Study of Induced Travel and Energy Rebound," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 297-308.
    15. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian, 2022. "Integrated path controlling and subsidy scheme for mobility and environmental management in automated transportation networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Xiaojuan Yu & Vincent van den Berg & Erik Verhoef, 2019. "Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion revisited: how in-vehicle activities determine aggregate travel patterns," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-067/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    17. Sieber, L. & Ruch, C. & Hörl, S. & Axhausen, K.W. & Frazzoli, E., 2020. "Improved public transportation in rural areas with self-driving cars: A study on the operation of Swiss train lines," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 35-51.
    18. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson, 2016. "Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Overcome First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8042k3d7, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    19. Liu, Peng & Ma, Yanjiao & Zuo, Yaqing, 2019. "Self-driving vehicles: Are people willing to trade risks for environmental benefits?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 139-149.
    20. Li, Yanning & Li, Xinwei & Jenn, Alan, 2022. "Evaluating the emission benefits of shared autonomous electric vehicle fleets: A case study in California," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5692-:d:881184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.