IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2548-d545864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organic Rankine Cycle Optimization Performance Analysis Based on Super-Heater Pressure: Comparison of Working Fluids

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Fernández-Guillamón

    (Department of Automatics, Electrical Eng. and Electronic Tech., Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ángel Molina-García

    (Department of Automatics, Electrical Eng. and Electronic Tech., Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Francisco Vera-García

    (Department of Thermal and Fluids Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • José A. Almendros-Ibáñez

    (Department of Applied Mechanics and Project Engineering, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02001 Albacete, Spain
    Section of Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy, Renewable Energy Research Institute of Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02001 Albacete, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is widely accepted to produce electricity from low-grade thermal heat sources. In fact, it is a developed technology for waste-heat to electricity conversions. In this paper, an ORC made up of super-heater, turbine, regenerator, condenser, pump, economizer and evaporator is considered. An optimization model to obtain the maximum performance of such ORC, depending on the super-heater pressure, is proposed and assessed, in order to find possible new working fluids that are less pollutant with similar behavior to those traditionally used. The different super-heater pressures under analysis lie in between the condenser pressure and 80% of the critical pressure of each working fluid, taking 100 values uniformly distributed. The system and optimization algorithm have been simulated in Matlab with the CoolProp library. Results show that the twelve working fluids can be categorized into four main groups, depending on the saturation pressure at ambient conditions (condenser pressure), observing that the fluids belonging to Group 1, which corresponds with the lower condensing pressure (around 100 kPa), provide the highest thermal efficiency, with values around η = 23 − 25 % . Moreover, it is also seen that R123 can be a good candidate to substitute R141B and R11; R114 can replace R236EA and R245FA; and both R1234ZE and R1234YF have similar behavior to R134A.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Fernández-Guillamón & Ángel Molina-García & Francisco Vera-García & José A. Almendros-Ibáñez, 2021. "Organic Rankine Cycle Optimization Performance Analysis Based on Super-Heater Pressure: Comparison of Working Fluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2548-:d:545864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2548/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2548/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desideri, Adriano & Gusev, Sergei & van den Broek, Martijn & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Experimental comparison of organic fluids for low temperature ORC (organic Rankine cycle) systems for waste heat recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 460-469.
    2. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    3. Bartosz Gil & Jacek Kasperski, 2018. "Efficiency Evaluation of the Ejector Cooling Cycle using a New Generation of HFO/HCFO Refrigerant as a R134a Replacement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. F. Tchanche, Bertrand & Pétrissans, M. & Papadakis, G., 2014. "Heat resources and organic Rankine cycle machines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1185-1199.
    5. Yu, Haoshui & Gundersen, Truls & Feng, Xiao, 2018. "Process integration of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and heat pump for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 330-340.
    6. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    7. Jiang, L. & Lu, H.T. & Wang, L.W. & Gao, P. & Zhu, F.Q. & Wang, R.Z. & Roskilly, A.P., 2017. "Investigation on a small-scale pumpless Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system driven by the low temperature heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 478-486.
    8. Hussein Jumma Jabir & Jiashen Teh & Dahaman Ishak & Hamza Abunima, 2018. "Impacts of Demand-Side Management on Electrical Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Saidur, R. & Rezaei, M. & Muzammil, W.K. & Hassan, M.H. & Paria, S. & Hasanuzzaman, M., 2012. "Technologies to recover exhaust heat from internal combustion engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5649-5659.
    10. Mota-Babiloni, Adrián & Navarro-Esbrí, Joaquín & Makhnatch, Pavel & Molés, Francisco, 2017. "Refrigerant R32 as lower GWP working fluid in residential air conditioning systems in Europe and the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1031-1042.
    11. Gábor Györke & Axel Groniewsky & Attila R. Imre, 2019. "A Simple Method of Finding New Dry and Isentropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, February.
    12. Zhu, Sipeng & Ma, Zetai & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "Energy and exergy analysis of the combined cycle power plant recovering waste heat from the marine two-stroke engine under design and off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Piyanut Saengsikhiao & Juntakan Taweekun & Kittinan Maliwan & Somchai Sae-ung & Thanansak Theppaya, 2020. "Investigation and Analysis of R463A as an Alternative Refrigerant to R404A with Lower Global Warming Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Li, Maoqing & Wang, Jiangfeng & He, Weifeng & Gao, Lin & Wang, Bo & Ma, Shaolin & Dai, Yiping, 2013. "Construction and preliminary test of a low-temperature regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) using R123," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 216-222.
    15. Ayachi, Fadhel & Boulawz Ksayer, Elias & Zoughaib, Assaad & Neveu, Pierre, 2014. "ORC optimization for medium grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 47-56.
    16. Dominika Matuszewska & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Koirala, Binod Prasad & Koliou, Elta & Friege, Jonas & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Herder, Paulien M., 2016. "Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 722-744.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesús García-Domínguez & J. Daniel Marcos, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis and Systematic Comparison of Solar-Heated Trigeneration Systems Based on ORC and Absorption Heat Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Baofeng Yao & Xu Ping & Hongguang Zhang, 2021. "Dynamic Response Characteristics Analysis and Energy, Exergy, and Economic (3E) Evaluation of Dual Loop Organic Rankine Cycle (DORC) for CNG Engine Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    2. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    3. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    4. Feng, Yong-qiang & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Su, Ting-Ying & Wang, Shuang & Wang, Qian & Yang, Shih-Cheng & Lin, Jaw-Ren & Lin, Chih-Hung, 2017. "Experimental investigation of a R245fa-based organic Rankine cycle adapting two operation strategies: Stand alone and grid connect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1239-1253.
    5. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    6. Xinxin Zhang & Yin Zhang & Min Cao & Jingfu Wang & Yuting Wu & Chongfang Ma, 2019. "Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    8. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Karvountzis-Kontakiotis & Apostolos Pesyridis & Muhammad Usman, 2018. "Expander Technologies for Automotive Engine Organic Rankine Cycle Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-36, July.
    9. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    10. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    11. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    12. Bartosz Gil & Anna Szczepanowska & Sabina Rosiek, 2021. "New HFC/HFO Blends as Refrigerants for the Vapor-Compression Refrigeration System (VCRS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Juan A. White & Santiago Velasco, 2019. "Approximating the Temperature–Entropy Saturation Curve of ORC Working Fluids From the Ideal Gas Isobaric Heat Capacity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    15. Shu, Gequn & Liu, Lina & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Yu, Guopeng, 2014. "Parametric and working fluid analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) used in engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1188-1198.
    16. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    17. Oluleye, Gbemi & Jobson, Megan & Smith, Robin & Perry, Simon J., 2016. "Evaluating the potential of process sites for waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 627-646.
    18. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    19. Chang, C.T. & Costa, M. & La Villetta, M. & Macaluso, A. & Piazzullo, D. & Vanoli, L., 2019. "Thermo-economic analyses of a Taiwanese combined CHP system fuelled with syngas from rice husk gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 766-780.
    20. Wu, Chuang & Yan, Xiao-jiang & Wang, Shun-sen & Bai, Kun-lun & Di, Juan & Cheng, Shang-fang & Li, Jun, 2016. "System optimisation and performance analysis of CO2 transcritical power cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 391-400.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2548-:d:545864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.