IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p929-d497032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical Formulation and Analytic Solutions for Uncertainty Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Gyun Seob Song

    (Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Korea)

  • Man Cheol Kim

    (Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Korea)

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulations are widely used for uncertainty analysis in the probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants. Despite many advantages, such as its general applicability, a Monte Carlo simulation has inherent limitations as a simulation-based approach. This study provides a mathematical formulation and analytic solutions for the uncertainty analysis in a probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). Starting from the definitions of variables, mathematical equations are derived for synthesizing probability density functions for logical AND, logical OR, and logical OR with rare event approximation of two independent events. The equations can be applied consecutively when there exist more than two events. For fail-to-run failures, the probability density function for the unavailability has the same probability distribution as the probability density function (PDF) for the failure rate under specified conditions. The effectiveness of the analytic solutions is demonstrated by applying them to an example system. The resultant probability density functions are in good agreement with the Monte Carlo simulation results, which are in fact approximations for those from the analytic solutions, with errors less than 12.6%. Important theoretical aspects are examined with the analytic solutions such as the validity of the use of a right-unbounded distribution to describe the uncertainty in the unavailability/probability. The analytic solutions for uncertainty analysis can serve as a basis for all other methods, providing deeper insights into uncertainty analyses in probabilistic safety assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gyun Seob Song & Man Cheol Kim, 2021. "Mathematical Formulation and Analytic Solutions for Uncertainty Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:929-:d:497032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/929/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/929/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanley Kaplan, 1981. "On The Method of Discrete Probability Distributions in Risk and Reliability Calculations–Application to Seismic Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 189-196, September.
    2. Durga Rao, K. & Kushwaha, H.S. & Verma, A.K. & Srividya, A., 2007. "Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 947-956.
    3. Ashraf Ben El‐Shanawany & Keith H. Ardron & Simon P. Walker, 2018. "Lognormal Approximations of Fault Tree Uncertainty Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1576-1584, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gyunyoung Heo, 2022. "Advancements in Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Energy for Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-2, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard L. Warr & Cason J. Wight, 2020. "Error Bounds for Cumulative Distribution Functions of Convolutions via the Discrete Fourier Transform," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 881-904, September.
    2. Lester B. Lave & Joshua Menkes, 1985. "Managing Risk: A Joint U.S.‐German Perspective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 17-23, March.
    3. Robert E. Kurth & David C. Cox, 1985. "Discrete Probability Distributions for Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3), pages 235-240, September.
    4. Raymond F. Boykin & Mardyros Kazarians & Raymond A. Freeman, 1986. "Comparative Fire Risk Study of PCB Transformers," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 477-488, December.
    5. Tu Duong Le Duy & Laurence Dieulle & Dominique Vasseur & Christophe Bérenguer & Mathieu Couplet, 2013. "An alternative comprehensive framework using belief functions for parameter and model uncertainty analysis in nuclear probabilistic risk assessment applications," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(5), pages 471-490, October.
    6. Sarat Sivaprasad & Cameron A. MacKenzie, 2018. "The Hurwicz Decision Rule’s Relationship to Decision Making with the Triangle and Beta Distributions and Exponential Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 139-153, September.
    7. Yoro, Kelvin O. & Daramola, Michael O. & Sekoai, Patrick T. & Wilson, Uwemedimo N. & Eterigho-Ikelegbe, Orevaoghene, 2021. "Update on current approaches, challenges, and prospects of modeling and simulation in renewable and sustainable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Wróbel, Krzysztof & Montewka, Jakub & Kujala, Pentti, 2018. "Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 209-224.
    9. Hu, Lunhu & Kang, Rui & Pan, Xing & Zuo, Dujun, 2020. "Risk assessment of uncertain random system—Level-1 and level-2 joint propagation of uncertainty and probability in fault tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Francesco, Di Maio & Matteo, Fumagalli & Carlo, Guerini & Federico, Perotti & Enrico, Zio, 2021. "Time-dependent reliability analysis of the reactor building of a nuclear power plant for accounting of its aging and degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Villanueva, D. & Haftka, R.T. & Sankar, B.V., 2014. "Accounting for future redesign to balance performance and development costs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 56-67.
    12. Takeda, Satoshi & Kitada, Takanori, 2021. "Simple method based on sensitivity coefficient for stochastic uncertainty analysis in probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Kwag, Shinyoung & Park, Junhee & Choi, In-Kil, 2020. "Development of efficient complete-sampling-based seismic PSA method for nuclear power plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Takeda, Satoshi & Kitada, Takanori, 2023. "Importance measure evaluation based on sensitivity coefficient for probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    15. James Knighton & Luis Bastidas, 2015. "A proposed probabilistic seismic tsunami hazard analysis methodology," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 699-723, August.
    16. Edouard Kujawski & Gregory A. Miller, 2007. "Quantitative risk‐based analysis for military counterterrorism systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 273-289, December.
    17. Zhenhao Zhang & Changchun Luo & Zhenpeng Zhao, 2020. "Application of probabilistic method in maximum tsunami height prediction considering stochastic seabed topography," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(3), pages 2511-2530, December.
    18. Edouard Kujawski, 2002. "Selection of technical risk responses for efficient contingencies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3), pages 194-212.
    19. Carolyn D. Heising & Virgilio Lopes de Oliveira, 1995. "A Unified Approach for Calculating Core Melt Frequency Caused by Internal and External Initiating Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 41-47, February.
    20. Stan Kaplan & James C. Lin, 1987. "An Improved Condensation Procedure in Discrete Probability Distribution Calculations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 15-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:929-:d:497032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.