IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v276y2020ics0306261920309740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving high-pressure water scrubbing through process integration and solvent selection for biogas upgrading

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Honglin
  • Ma, Chunyan
  • Yang, Zhuhong
  • Lu, Xiaohua
  • Ji, Xiaoyan

Abstract

Biogas plays a vital role in many renewable and sustainable energy strategies, where CO2 removal is required to produce biomethane (i.e., biogas upgrading). New ideas and technologies have been proposed to improve the process efficiency of biogas upgrading with liquid absorbents, and ionic liquids have been identified as promising candidates. Meanwhile, there is an urgent need to effectively utilize low-quality waste heat in industry. In this study, two strategies (i.e., waste heat integration and desorption unit modification) were proposed and compared with the original high-pressure water scrubbing; in addition, the effects of the temperatures of the heat source and solvents on the energy usage and cost were further investigated. The results showed that the total cost of the process integrated with waste heat recovery decreased by 6.2% compared with the original high-pressure water scrubbing, and the higher temperature of the waste heat source corresponded to a lower cost. The comparison of different solvents further confirmed that ionic liquid-based solvents were promising, with a potential cost reduction of 24.7%; the properties of the solvent, such as the CO2 absorption capacity, selectivity, and viscosity had significant influences on the total cost, and a new and single index “comparative absorption factor” was proposed to reflect the overall impact of these properties on the cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Honglin & Ma, Chunyan & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Improving high-pressure water scrubbing through process integration and solvent selection for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:276:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920309740
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920309740
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Yujiao & Björkmalm, Johanna & Ma, Chunyan & Willquist, Karin & Yngvesson, Johan & Wallberg, Ola & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading using ionic liquids in comparison with industrially used technology in Scandinavian anaerobic digestion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 742-750.
    2. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Xie, Yujiao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2016. "Screening of conventional ionic liquids for carbon dioxide capture and separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1160-1170.
    3. Jianmin Zhang & Jian Sun & Xiaochun Zhang & Yansong Zhao & Suojiang Zhang, 2011. "The recent development of CO 2 fixation and conversion by ionic liquid," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 142-159, June.
    4. Ma, Chunyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 437-447.
    5. Xie, Yujiao & Ma, Chunyan & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2016. "Evaluation of imidazolium-based ionic liquids for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 69-81.
    6. Sun, Qie & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinying & Liu, Longcheng & Yu, Zhixin & Yu, Xinhai, 2015. "Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 521-532.
    7. Wolfgang Loibl & Romana Stollnberger & Doris Österreicher, 2017. "Residential Heat Supply by Waste-Heat Re-Use: Sources, Supply Potential and Demand Coverage—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Bohan & Lu, Mingjian & Shui, Bo & Sun, Yuwei & Wei, Wei, 2022. "Thermal-hydraulic performance analysis of printed circuit heat exchanger precooler in the Brayton cycle for supercritical CO2 waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    4. Eero Inkeri & Tero Tynjälä, 2020. "Modeling of CO 2 Capture with Water Bubble Column Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Francesco Liberato Cappiello & Luca Cimmino & Marialuisa Napolitano & Maria Vicidomini, 2022. "Thermoeconomic Analysis of Biomethane Production Plants: A Dynamic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Huang, Hong & Fan, Shuanshi & Wang, Yanhong & Lang, Xuemei & Li, Gang, 2023. "Energy and exergy efficiency analysis for biogas De-CO2 with tetra-n-butylammonium bromide hydrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Chen, Yifeng & Song, Shuailong & Li, Ning & Wu, Jian & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2022. "Developing hybrid 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide/titanium dioxide/water absorbent for CO2 separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    8. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    3. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Ye, Nannan & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2021. "CO2 capture using ionic liquid-based hybrid solvents from experiment to process evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    4. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Qadeer, Kinza & Valentina, Valentina & Khan, Amin & Yasin, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & De Guido, Giorgia & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2020. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane: Assessment of 3P's–Production, processing, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Choline-based deep eutectic solvents for CO2 separation: Review and thermodynamic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 436-455.
    6. Kazmi, Bilal & Haider, Junaid & Ammar Taqvi, Syed Ali & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ali, Syed Imran & Hussain Awan, Zahoor Ul & Lim, Hankwon & Naqvi, Muhammad & Naqvi, Salman Raza, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic assessment of cyano functionalized anion based ionic liquid for CO2 removal from natural gas integrated with, single mixed refrigerant liquefaction process for clean energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    7. Edyta Słupek & Patrycja Makoś & Jacek Gębicki, 2020. "Theoretical and Economic Evaluation of Low-Cost Deep Eutectic Solvents for Effective Biogas Upgrading to Bio-Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Chen, Yifeng & Sun, Yunhao & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "CO2 separation using a hybrid choline-2-pyrrolidine-carboxylic acid/polyethylene glycol/water absorbent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. Ma, Chunyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 437-447.
    10. Tooba Qureshi & Majeda Khraisheh & Fares Almomani, 2023. "Cost and Heat Integration Analysis for CO 2 Removal Using Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid-ASPEN PLUS Modelling Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Pellegrino, Sandro & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Greening the gas network – The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 266-286.
    12. Zhang, Yuyao & Kawasaki, Yu & Oshita, Kazuyuki & Takaoka, Masaki & Minami, Daisuke & Inoue, Go & Tanaka, Toshihiro, 2021. "Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 119-130.
    13. Kwon, Gihoon & Tsang, Daniel C.W. & Oh, Jeong-Ik & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Song, Hocheol, 2019. "Pyrolysis of aquatic carbohydrates using CO2 as reactive gas medium: A case study of chitin," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 136-143.
    14. Rasheed, Rizwan & Tahir, Fizza & Yasar, Abdullah & Sharif, Faiza & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Ahmad, Sajid Rashid & Wang, Yubo & Su, Yuehong, 2022. "Environmental life cycle analysis of a modern commercial-scale fibreglass composite-based biogas scrubbing system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1261-1271.
    15. Silverman, Rochelle E. & Flores, Robert J. & Brouwer, Jack, 2020. "Energy and economic assessment of distributed renewable gas and electricity generation in a small disadvantaged urban community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    16. Hou, Rui & Zhang, Nachuan & Yang, Chengsheng & Zhao, Jing & Li, Peng & Sun, Bo, 2023. "A novel structure of natural gas, electricity, and methanol production using a combined reforming cycle: Integration of biogas upgrading, liquefied natural gas re-gasification, power plant, and methan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    18. Philipp Biegger & Florian Kirchbacher & Ana Roza Medved & Martin Miltner & Markus Lehner & Michael Harasek, 2018. "Development of Honeycomb Methanation Catalyst and Its Application in Power to Gas Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.
    20. Ding, Lingkan & Chan Gutierrez, Enrique & Cheng, Jun & Xia, Ao & O'Shea, Richard & Guneratnam, Amita Jacob & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Assessment of continuous fermentative hydrogen and methane co-production using macro- and micro-algae with increasing organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 760-770.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:276:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920309740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.