IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v9y2018i2p43-d191364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sanitization of Early Life and Microbial Dysbiosis

Author

Listed:
  • Shelly Jun

    (Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

  • Kelsea Drall

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

  • Brittany Matenchuk

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

  • Cara McLean

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

  • Charlene Nielsen

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

  • Chinwe V. Obiakor

    (School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

  • Aaron Van der Leek

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

  • Anita Kozyrskyj

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada
    School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada)

Abstract

Childbearing and infant care practices have dramatically evolved since the 15th century. Shifting away from traditional home-based experiences, with the emergence of the microbial aware era and the hospital as a quintessential sanitizing machine, early life has now long been characterized as a condition to be medically managed. Paradoxically, this ‘germ-free’ march towards a healthier early life environment has opened the door to greater microbial susceptibility and dysbiosis. Many studies have now established that infant exposure to excessive sanitation and hygiene regimens are associated with an increased risk for and onset of childhood immune system diseases. In this paper, we explore the ways in which biomedical-centered efforts to enhance early life have come at a cost to planetary health, in relation to infant microbial succession. We examine three major areas of early life that have been subject to the ‘ripple effect’ of hygiene and sanitation concerns—childbirth, home environment, and breastfeeding.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelly Jun & Kelsea Drall & Brittany Matenchuk & Cara McLean & Charlene Nielsen & Chinwe V. Obiakor & Aaron Van der Leek & Anita Kozyrskyj, 2018. "Sanitization of Early Life and Microbial Dysbiosis," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:43-:d:191364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/9/2/43/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/9/2/43/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huffman, Wallace E., 2011. "Household Production and the Demand for Food and Other Inputs: U.S. Evidence," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Curtis, Val & Biran, Adam & Deverell, Katie & Hughes, Clarissa & Bellamy, Kate & Drasar, Bo, 2003. "Hygiene in the home: relating bugs and behaviour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 657-672, August.
    3. De Vries, Raymond & Lemmens, Trudo, 2006. "The social and cultural shaping of medical evidence: Case studies from pharmaceutical research and obstetric science," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2694-2706, June.
    4. Oonagh E Keag & Jane E Norman & Sarah J Stock, 2018. "Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Nhan T. Ho & Fan Li & Kathleen A. Lee-Sarwar & Hein M. Tun & Bryan P. Brown & Pia S. Pannaraj & Jeffrey M. Bender & Meghan B. Azad & Amanda L. Thompson & Scott T. Weiss & M. Andrea Azcarate-Peril & Au, 2018. "Meta-analysis of effects of exclusive breastfeeding on infant gut microbiota across populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perrotta, Manuela & Geampana, Alina, 2020. "The trouble with IVF and randomised control trials: Professional legitimation narratives on time-lapse imaging and evidence-informed care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Scharadin, Benjamin, 2022. "The efficacy of the dependent care deduction at maintaining diet quality," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Fujioka Soichiro & Fukushige Mototsugu, 2019. "The Future of Demand for Food Away from Home and Prepared Food: Cohort and Age Effects in Japan," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Jeong-Seon Lee & Jae Il Shin & Sunyeup Kim & Yong-Sung Choi & Youn Ho Shin & Jimin Hwang & Jung U Shin & Ai Koyanagi & Louis Jacob & Lee Smith & Han Eol Jeong & Yunha Noh & In-Sun Oh & Sang Youl Rhee , 2023. "Breastfeeding and impact on childhood hospital admissions: a nationwide birth cohort in South Korea," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Pavlova, Milena & Hendrix, Marijke & Nouwens, Elvira & Nijhuis, Jan & van Merode, Godefridus, 2009. "The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: Implications for policy and management," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 27-34, November.
    6. Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak & Jacek Krzysztof Szymański & Michał Ciebiera & Beata Sarecka-Hujar & Grzegorz Jakiel, 2020. "Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Unruh, Lynn & Rice, Thomas & Rosenau, Pauline Vaillancourt & Barnes, Andrew J., 2016. "The 2013 cholesterol guideline controversy: Would better evidence prevent pharmaceuticalization?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(7), pages 797-808.
    8. Taja Bracic & Isabella Pfniß & Nadja Taumberger & Kaltrina Kutllovci-Hasani & Daniela Ulrich & Wolfgang Schöll & Philipp Reif, 2020. "A 10 year comparative study of caesarean deliveries using the Robson 10 group classification system in a university hospital in Austria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Shojaeddini, Ensieh & Schreiber, Andrew & Wolverton, Ann & Marten, Alex, 2024. "Consumer demand and the economy-wide costs of regulation: Modeling households with empirically estimated flexible functional forms," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Street, Jackie M. & Rogers, Wendy A. & Israel, Mark & Braunack-Mayer, Annette J., 2010. "Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1458-1465, May.
    11. David Card & Alessandra Fenizia & David Silver, 2023. "The Health Impacts of Hospital Delivery Practices," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 42-81, May.
    12. Alice Risely & Kerstin Wilhelm & Tim Clutton-Brock & Marta B. Manser & Simone Sommer, 2021. "Diurnal oscillations in gut bacterial load and composition eclipse seasonal and lifetime dynamics in wild meerkats," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Sobo, Elisa J., 2017. "Parent use of cannabis for intractable pediatric epilepsy: Everyday empiricism and the boundaries of scientific medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 190-198.
    14. Okrent, Abigail M. & Kumcu, Aylin, 2016. "U.S. Households’ Demand for Convenience Foods," Economic Research Report 262195, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Yue Clare Lou & Benjamin E. Rubin & Marie C. Schoelmerich & Kaden S. DiMarco & Adair L. Borges & Rachel Rovinsky & Leo Song & Jennifer A. Doudna & Jillian F. Banfield, 2023. "Infant microbiome cultivation and metagenomic analysis reveal Bifidobacterium 2’-fucosyllactose utilization can be facilitated by coexisting species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Mykhalovskiy, Eric & Armstrong, Pat & Armstrong, Hugh & Bourgeault, Ivy & Choiniere, Jackie & Lexchin, Joel & Peters, Suzanne & White, Jerry, 2008. "Qualitative research and the politics of knowledge in an age of evidence: Developing a research-based practice of immanent critique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 195-203, July.
    17. Huang Lin & Merete Eggesbø & Shyamal Das Peddada, 2022. "Linear and nonlinear correlation estimators unveil undescribed taxa interactions in microbiome data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Ana Costa-Ramón & Mika Kortelainen & Ana Rodríguez-González & Lauri Sääksvuori, 2022. "The Long-Run Effects of Cesarean Sections," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(6), pages 2048-2085.
    19. Gwinyai Masukume & Ali S Khashan & Susan M B Morton & Philip N Baker & Louise C Kenny & Fergus P McCarthy, 2019. "Caesarean section delivery and childhood obesity in a British longitudinal cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Maria Healy & Viola Nyman & Dale Spence & René H J Otten & Corine J Verhoeven, 2020. "How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour? A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:43-:d:191364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.