IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0240475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A 10 year comparative study of caesarean deliveries using the Robson 10 group classification system in a university hospital in Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Taja Bracic
  • Isabella Pfniß
  • Nadja Taumberger
  • Kaltrina Kutllovci-Hasani
  • Daniela Ulrich
  • Wolfgang Schöll
  • Philipp Reif

Abstract

Objective: The Robson ten group classification system is used as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing caesarean delivery (CD) rates within and between maternity services. Our objective was to compare the changes of CD rates at our institution between the years 2008–2010 and 2017–2019 using the Robson ten group classification system. Study design: Data was collected retrospectively and all women were classified using the obstetric concepts and parameters described in the Robson ten group classification system. Results: During 2008–2010 7,832 deliveries were performed, increasing to 9,490 in 2017–2019. The CD rate also increased from 29.1% to 32.2% (p

Suggested Citation

  • Taja Bracic & Isabella Pfniß & Nadja Taumberger & Kaltrina Kutllovci-Hasani & Daniela Ulrich & Wolfgang Schöll & Philipp Reif, 2020. "A 10 year comparative study of caesarean deliveries using the Robson 10 group classification system in a university hospital in Austria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240475
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240475
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240475&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0240475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oonagh E Keag & Jane E Norman & Sarah J Stock, 2018. "Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak & Jacek Krzysztof Szymański & Michał Ciebiera & Beata Sarecka-Hujar & Grzegorz Jakiel, 2020. "Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Shelly Jun & Kelsea Drall & Brittany Matenchuk & Cara McLean & Charlene Nielsen & Chinwe V. Obiakor & Aaron Van der Leek & Anita Kozyrskyj, 2018. "Sanitization of Early Life and Microbial Dysbiosis," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, December.
    3. David Card & Alessandra Fenizia & David Silver, 2019. "The Health Impacts of Hospital Delivery Practices," NBER Working Papers 25986, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Ana Costa-Ramón & Mika Kortelainen & Ana Rodríguez-González & Lauri Sääksvuori, 2022. "The Long-Run Effects of Cesarean Sections," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(6), pages 2048-2085.
    5. Gwinyai Masukume & Ali S Khashan & Susan M B Morton & Philip N Baker & Louise C Kenny & Fergus P McCarthy, 2019. "Caesarean section delivery and childhood obesity in a British longitudinal cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Maria Healy & Viola Nyman & Dale Spence & René H J Otten & Corine J Verhoeven, 2020. "How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour? A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Lenore Manderson & Fiona C. Ross, 2020. "Publics, technologies and interventions in reproduction and early life in South Africa," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Azahara María García-Serna & Elena Martín-Orozco & Trinidad Hernández-Caselles & Eva Morales, 2021. "Prenatal and Perinatal Environmental Influences Shaping the Neonatal Immune System: A Focus on Asthma and Allergy Origins," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-24, April.
    9. R. Padmasaranya & Kaviya.M & G.Shravanthi & Vadivelan.K, 2020. "To Find the Quality of Life in Multiparae Women Who Have Undergone Multiple C-Section," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(3), pages 113-114, March.
    10. Monika Bączkowska & Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska & Magdalena Zgliczyńska & Robert Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha & Beata Rebizant & Michał Ciebiera, 2022. "Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Perinatal Outcomes of Placental Abruption—Detailed Annual Data and Clinical Perspectives from Polish Tertiary Center," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Rubén Aragón-Martín & María del Mar Gómez-Sánchez & David Jiménez-Pavón & José Manuel Martínez-Nieto & Mónica Schwarz-Rodríguez & Carmen Segundo-Iglesias & José Pedro Novalbos-Ruiz & María José Santi-, 2021. "A Multimodal Intervention for Prevention of Overweight and Obesity in Schoolchildren. A Protocol Study “PREVIENE-CÁDIZ”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Shuqin Zeng & Dhrati Patangia & Alexandre Almeida & Zhemin Zhou & Dezhi Mu & R. Paul Ross & Catherine Stanton & Shaopu Wang, 2022. "A compendium of 32,277 metagenome-assembled genomes and over 80 million genes from the early-life human gut microbiome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.