IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p303-d1047940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grape Wine Cultivation Carbon Footprint: Embracing a Life Cycle Approach across Climatic Zones

Author

Listed:
  • Yuval Tamar Hefler

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel)

  • Meidad Kissinger

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel)

Abstract

Ongoing climate change processes and increasing environmental pressure suggest the need to adjust the wine production systems worldwide to the new conditions while reducing their environmental pressure. The grapes’ cultivation phase may be influenced by expected changes. It follows that existing grape wine cultivation systems should be analyzed to identify major ‘hotspots’ and opportunities for change. Several studies have analyzed materials, energy inputs, and related emissions along the grape wine life cycle. However, most research focuses on traditional grape wine growing areas, and no study has yet focused on grape wine grown in unconventional desert areas. The research presented in this paper analyzed the carbon footprint (CF) of grapes grown in the Mediterranean, semi-arid, and arid climatic regions in the state of Israel. It revealed that, on average, a ton of grapes generates 342 kg CO 2 eq from the cradle to the farm gate. The product was analyzed using a life-cycle approach, with the aim of studying the CF of each phase according. Most emissions were found to be related to the use of fertilizers (37%), fuel for transportation and mechanization (19%), and water supply (17%). The CF of grapes in the arid region was found to be the highest at 361 kg CO 2 eq compared to 317 kg CO 2 eq in the semi-arid region and 346 kg CO 2 eq in the Mediterranean region. The analysis emphasizes the arid and semi-arid potential to reduce its CF by implementing farm management practices, including the choice of grape varieties, changing vineyard infrastructure, fertilizers, water management, and more. As presented here, understanding cropping systems in these regions can promote a better adaptation of the cropping systems to the changing conditions around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuval Tamar Hefler & Meidad Kissinger, 2023. "Grape Wine Cultivation Carbon Footprint: Embracing a Life Cycle Approach across Climatic Zones," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:303-:d:1047940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/303/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/303/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paola Masotti & Andrea Zattera & Mario Malagoli & Paolo Bogoni, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of Organic and Biodynamic Wine Produced in Northeast Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Carmen Ferrara & Giovanni De Feo, 2018. "Life Cycle Assessment Application to the Wine Sector: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Alfonso Aranda & Ignacio Zabalza & Sabina Scarpellini, 2005. "Economic and environmental analysis of the wine bottle production in Spain by means of life cycle assessment," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 178-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariana Guerra & Fátima Ferreira & Ana Alexandra Oliveira & Teresa Pinto & Carlos A. Teixeira, 2024. "Drivers of Environmental Sustainability in the Wine Industry: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Petr Bača & Vladimír Mašán & Petr Vanýsek & Patrik Burg & Tomáš Binar & Jana Burgová & Zdeněk Abrham, 2024. "Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Viticultural Production in Central European Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouil Tziolas & Eleftherios Karapatzak & Ioannis Kalathas & Chris Lytridis & Spyridon Mamalis & Stefanos Koundouras & Theodore Pachidis & Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of Environmental/Energy Performance under Conventional Labor and Collaborative Robot Scenarios in Greek Viticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Giuliana Vinci & Sabrina Antonia Prencipe & Ada Abbafati & Matteo Filippi, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment of an Organic Wine Production in Central Italy: Case Study from Lazio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Romero, Pascual & Navarro, Josefa María & Ordaz, Pablo Botía, 2022. "Towards a sustainable viticulture: The combination of deficit irrigation strategies and agroecological practices in Mediterranean vineyards. A review and update," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Jesús Barrena-González & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Yeboah Gyasi-Agyei & Manuel Pulido Fernández & Artemi Cerdà, 2020. "Applying the RUSLE and ISUM in the Tierra de Barros Vineyards (Extremadura, Spain) to Estimate Soil Mobilisation Rates," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Paola Masotti & Andrea Zattera & Mario Malagoli & Paolo Bogoni, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of Organic and Biodynamic Wine Produced in Northeast Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Trigo, Ana & Marta-Costa, Ana & Fragoso, Rui, 2023. "Improving sustainability assessment: A context-oriented classification analysis for the wine industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Marc Jourdaine & Philippe Loubet & Stephane Trebucq & Guido Sonnemann, 2020. "A detailed quantitative comparison of the life cycle assessment of bottled wines using an original harmonization procedure," Post-Print hal-03253002, HAL.
    9. Pascual Romero Azorín & José García García, 2020. "The Productive, Economic, and Social Efficiency of Vineyards Using Combined Drought-Tolerant Rootstocks and Efficient Low Water Volume Deficit Irrigation Techniques under Mediterranean Semiarid Condit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Maria Vrublevskaya & Thi Tra My Nguyenová & Lucie Drábová & Petra Lovecká & Blanka Vrchotová & Olga Maťátková & Markéta Kulišová & Irena Jarošová Kolouchová, 2023. "Biodiversity of Vitis vinifera endophytes in conventional and biodynamic vineyard," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(1), pages 44-53.
    11. Anna Kounina & Elisa Tatti & Sebastien Humbert & Richard Pfister & Amanda Pike & Jean-François Ménard & Yves Loerincik & Olivier Jolliet, 2012. "The Importance of Considering Product Loss Rates in Life Cycle Assessment: The Example of Closure Systems for Bottled Wine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-34, October.
    12. Sotirios Pilafidis & Eleftherios Kosmas & Ioannis Livieratos & Vasileios D. Gkisakis, 2024. "Assessing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Cretan vineyards for the development of a crop-specific decision support tool," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24415-24452, September.
    13. Nicola Casolani & Emilio Chiodo & Lolita Liberatore, 2023. "Continuous Improvement of VIVA-Certified Wines: Analysis and Perspective of Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Vasileios M. Pappas & Iordanis Samanidis & Giorgos Stavropoulos & Vassilis Athanasiadis & Theodoros Chatzimitakos & Eleni Bozinou & Dimitris P. Makris & Stavros I. Lalas, 2023. "Analysis of Five-Extraction Technologies’ Environmental Impact on the Polyphenols Production from Moringa oleifera Leaves Using the Life Cycle Assessment Tool Based on ISO 14040," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Cristina Matos & António Pirra, 2022. "Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions Related to Wine Production: The Case Study of a Winery in Douro Wine Region-Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, April.
    16. Moritz Wagner & Peter Stanbury & Tabea Dietrich & Johanna Döring & Joachim Ewert & Carlotta Foerster & Maximilian Freund & Matthias Friedel & Claudia Kammann & Mirjam Koch & Tom Owtram & Hans Reiner S, 2023. "Developing a Sustainability Vision for the Global Wine Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    17. Olimpia Martucci & Gabriella Arcese & Chiara Montauti & Alessia Acampora, 2019. "Social Aspects in the Wine Sector: Comparison between Social Life Cycle Assessment and VIVA Sustainable Wine Project Indicators," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    18. José Adolfo Lozano-Miralles & Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez & Alfonso Gago-Calderón & Paulo Brito, 2019. "LCA Case Study to LED Outdoor Luminaries as a Circular Economy Solution to Local Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Eugene Yin Cheung Wong & Danny C. K. Ho & Stuart So & Mark Ching‐Pong Poo, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and production: Modelling product carbon footprint of beverage merchandise using a supply chain input‐process‐output approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 175-188, January.
    20. Amanda J. Trombly & Marie-Odile P. Fortier, 2019. "Carbon Footprint of Wines from the Finger Lakes Region in New York State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:303-:d:1047940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.