IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5613-d1426333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers of Environmental Sustainability in the Wine Industry: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Guerra

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Fátima Ferreira

    (Center for Computational and Stochastic Mathematics (CEMAT), Instituto Superior Técnico of the University of Lisboa (IST-UL), 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana Alexandra Oliveira

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Teresa Pinto

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Carlos A. Teixeira

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive review of the existing literature to identify the most relevant environmental variables and other factors influencing the life cycle assessment of the wine industry. This research seeks to determine whether the type of wine significantly impacts the carbon footprint and to highlight the importance of production strategies over wine typology or grape variety in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This review encompasses an extensive analysis of previous studies on the environmental impact of wine production. This method involves synthesizing findings from life cycle inventory assessments to identify key variables contributing to greenhouse gas emissions. This analysis also considers regional variations and the effectiveness of different production strategies in mitigating environmental impacts. This review indicates that wine typology (red or white) and grape variety are less significant in determining the carbon footprint than the production strategies employed. It identifies specific variables that contribute substantially to greenhouse gas emissions in wine production. The analysis highlights the need for standardized assessment methods to ensure accurate determination of influential factors in reducing emissions. This study concludes that achieving environmental sustainability in the wine industry requires a balanced approach that integrates environmental, economic, and social aspects. It emphasizes the necessity of developing standardized and universal strategies for assessing wine sustainability. The application of artificial intelligence is proposed as a crucial tool for improving data gathering, trend analysis, and formulating customized sustainability strategies for different wine regions. Addressing the challenges of sustainability in the wine industry is imperative for environmental preservation and the wellbeing of future generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Guerra & Fátima Ferreira & Ana Alexandra Oliveira & Teresa Pinto & Carlos A. Teixeira, 2024. "Drivers of Environmental Sustainability in the Wine Industry: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5613-:d:1426333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5613/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5613/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Calker, K.J. & Berentsen, P.B.M. & Romero, C. & Giesen, G.W.J. & Huirne, R.B.M., 2006. "Development and application of a multi-attribute sustainability function for Dutch dairy farming systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 640-658, June.
    2. van Leeuwen, Cornelis & Darriet, Philippe, 2016. "The Impact of Climate Change on Viticulture and Wine Quality," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 150-167, May.
    3. Yuval Tamar Hefler & Meidad Kissinger, 2023. "Grape Wine Cultivation Carbon Footprint: Embracing a Life Cycle Approach across Climatic Zones," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Hans De Steur & Hélène Temmerman & Xavier Gellynck & Maurizio Canavari, 2020. "Drivers, adoption, and evaluation of sustainability practices in Italian wine SMEs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 744-762, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Santillán & L. Garrote & A. Iglesias & V. Sotes, 2020. "Climate change risks and adaptation: new indicators for Mediterranean viticulture," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 881-899, May.
    2. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Riesgo, Laura, 2016. "Modeling at farm level: Positive Multi-Attribute Utility Programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-27.
    3. Alejandro del Pozo & Nidia Brunel-Saldias & Alejandra Engler & Samuel Ortega-Farias & Cesar Acevedo-Opazo & Gustavo A. Lobos & Roberto Jara-Rojas & Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, 2019. "Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies of Agriculture in Mediterranean-Climate Regions (MCRs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Ranjan Roy & Ngai Weng Chan, 2012. "An assessment of agricultural sustainability indicators in Bangladesh: review and synthesis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 99-110, March.
    5. Abad, Francisco Javier & Marín, Diana & Loidi, Maite & Miranda, Carlos & Royo, José Bernardo & Urrestarazu, Jorge & Santesteban, Luis Gonzaga, 2019. "Evaluation of the incidence of severe trimming on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) water consumption," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 646-653.
    6. Inmaculada Carrasco & Juan Sebastián Castillo-Valero & Carmen Córcoles & Marcos Carchano, 2021. "Greening Wine Exports? Changes in the Carbon Footprint of Spanish Wine Exports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Amogh Prakasha Kumar & Richard Watt & Laura Meriluoto, 2021. "New Evidence on Using Expert Ratings to Proxy for Wine Quality in Climate Change Research," Working Papers in Economics 21/10, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    8. Laura Broccardo & Elisa Truant & Lèo‐Paul Dana, 2023. "The sustainability orientation in the wine industry: An analysis based on age as a driver," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1300-1313, May.
    9. Félix Calle & Ángela González-Moreno & Inmaculada Carrasco & Manuel Vargas-Vargas, 2020. "Social Economy, Environmental Proactivity, Eco-Innovation and Performance in the Spanish Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Ma, Xiaochi & Sanguinet, Karen A. & Jacoby, Pete W., 2020. "Direct root-zone irrigation outperforms surface drip irrigation for grape yield and crop water use efficiency while restricting root growth," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Daria Maciejewska & Dawid Olewnicki & Dagmara Stangierska-Mazurkiewicz & Marcin Tyminski & Piotr Latocha, 2024. "Impact of Climate Change on the Development of Viticulture in Central Poland: Autoregression Modeling SAT Indicator," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Franciely Velozo Aragão & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli & Fernanda Cavicchioli Zola & Emanuely Velozo Aragão & Luis Henrique Nogueira Marinho & Ana Lidia Cascales Correa & João Carlos Colmenero, 2023. "Smart Cities Maturity Model—A Multicriteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Van Passel, Steven & Nevens, Frank & Mathijs, Erik & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2007. "Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 149-161, April.
    14. Sieber, Stefan & Amjath-Babu, T.S. & Reidsma, Pytrik & Koenig, Hannes & Piorr, Annette & Bezlepkina, Irina & Mueller, Klaus, 2018. "Sustainability impact assessment tools for land use policy advice: A comparative analysis of five research approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 75-85.
    15. Philip Leat & Cesar Revoredo-Giha & Chrysa Lamprinopoulou, 2011. "Scotland’s Food and Drink Policy Discussion: Sustainability Issues in the Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-27, March.
    16. Carmona, Gema & Varela-Ortega, Consuelo & Bromley, John, 2009. "Stakeholder involvement in water management using Object-oriented Bayesian networks and economic models in Spain," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 49897, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Helder Fraga & Teresa R. Freitas & Marco Moriondo & Daniel Molitor & João A. Santos, 2024. "Determining the Climatic Drivers for Wine Production in the Côa Region (Portugal) Using a Machine Learning Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Paolo Cupo & Rinalda Alberta Di Cerbo, 2016. "The determinants of ranking in sustainable efficiency of Italian farms," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 141-159.
    19. van Calker, K.J. & Berentsen, P.B.M. & Giesen, G.W.J. & Huirne, R.B.M., 2008. "Maximising sustainability of Dutch dairy farming systems for different stakeholders: A modelling approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 407-419, April.
    20. Berkhout, E.D. & Schipper, R.A. & Van Keulen, H. & Coulibaly, O., 2011. "Heterogeneity in farmers' production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: Results and implications from northern Nigeria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 63-74, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5613-:d:1426333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.