IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjf/v41y2023i1id200-2022-cjfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biodiversity of Vitis vinifera endophytes in conventional and biodynamic vineyard

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Vrublevskaya

    (Department of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Thi Tra My Nguyenová

    (Department of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Lucie Drábová

    (Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Petra Lovecká

    (Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Blanka Vrchotová

    (Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Olga Maťátková

    (Department of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Markéta Kulišová
  • Irena Jarošová Kolouchová

    (Department of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Plants are permanently exposed to biotic and abiotic stress and have therefore developed intricate resistance mechanisms, consequently. These include the presence of microbial endophytes, which can promote plant growth and ensure better resilience against unfavourable conditions. These microorganisms colonising plant tissues can directly affect plant growth by producing phytohormones, antioxidants, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity, or indirectly by the production of siderophores and antifungal agents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study devoted to assessing bacterial endophyte diversity and their plant growth-promoting properties in two utterly distinct vineyards in view of agricultural management (conventional, biodynamic) in the Czech Republic. With these different agricultural approaches, we hypothesised different numerical representations of bacterial endophytes acquired from vine shoots and leaves, which was not proved (P = 0.743, F = 0.129). A total of 470 distinct bacterial endophytes were isolated from the Vitis vinifera plants from the conventional and biodynamic vineyard and from which over 80% were identified by the matrix-assisted laser desorption-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). In both vineyards, the dominant bacterial genus was Bacillus, followed by Pantoea, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus. Plant-promoting endophyte properties varied with respect to the season and type of vineyard. The ability to produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and ACC deaminase was higher in the biodynamic vineyard, in comparison with antioxidant activity, which was found in a higher proportion in isolates from the conventional vineyard.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Vrublevskaya & Thi Tra My Nguyenová & Lucie Drábová & Petra Lovecká & Blanka Vrchotová & Olga Maťátková & Markéta Kulišová & Irena Jarošová Kolouchová, 2023. "Biodiversity of Vitis vinifera endophytes in conventional and biodynamic vineyard," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(1), pages 44-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:41:y:2023:i:1:id:200-2022-cjfs
    DOI: 10.17221/200/2022-CJFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/200/2022-CJFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/200/2022-CJFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/200/2022-CJFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guilherme Lages Barbosa & Francisca Daiane Almeida Gadelha & Natalya Kublik & Alan Proctor & Lucas Reichelm & Emily Weissinger & Gregory M. Wohlleb & Rolf U. Halden, 2015. "Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Paola Masotti & Andrea Zattera & Mario Malagoli & Paolo Bogoni, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of Organic and Biodynamic Wine Produced in Northeast Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouil Tziolas & Eleftherios Karapatzak & Ioannis Kalathas & Chris Lytridis & Spyridon Mamalis & Stefanos Koundouras & Theodore Pachidis & Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of Environmental/Energy Performance under Conventional Labor and Collaborative Robot Scenarios in Greek Viticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Yi-Xuan Lu & Si-Ting Wang & Guan-Xin Yao & Jing Xu, 2023. "Green Total Factor Efficiency in Vegetable Production: A Comprehensive Ecological Analysis of China’s Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Ehsan Daneshyar, 2024. "Residential Rooftop Urban Agriculture: Architectural Design Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.
    4. Muhammad Azhar Ansari & Giovanni Ciampi & Sergio Sibilio, 2023. "Tackling Efficiency Challenges and Exploring Greenhouse-Integrated Organic Photovoltaics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Rosnani Abd Ghani & Suhana Omar & Márton Jolánkai & Ákos Tarnawa & Noriza Khalid & Mária Katalin Kassai & Zoltán Kende, 2023. "Response of Shoot and Root Growth, Yield, and Chemical Composition to Nutrient Concentrations in Soybean Varieties Grown under Soilless and Controlled Environment Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Giuliana Vinci & Sabrina Antonia Prencipe & Ada Abbafati & Matteo Filippi, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment of an Organic Wine Production in Central Italy: Case Study from Lazio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Yuval Tamar Hefler & Meidad Kissinger, 2023. "Grape Wine Cultivation Carbon Footprint: Embracing a Life Cycle Approach across Climatic Zones," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Michael Graham Parkes & Rebekah O’Rourke & Tiago Domingos & Ricardo F. M. Teixeira, 2023. "An Experimental Portuguese Social-Enterprise Project in Urban Agriculture: A Case Study on the Influence of the Interaction of Stakeholder Roles on Sustainable Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Lukas Simon Kriem & Carsten Pietzka & Marc Beckett & Luisa Gärtling & Benjamin Wriedt, 2023. "Electrochemical In Situ Hydrogen Peroxide Production Can Reduce Microbial Load in Bioponic Nutrient Solutions Derived from Organic Waste," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Dimitra I. Pomoni & Maria K. Koukou & Michail Gr. Vrachopoulos & Labros Vasiliadis, 2023. "A Review of Hydroponics and Conventional Agriculture Based on Energy and Water Consumption, Environmental Impact, and Land Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Sustainable Agriculture: Review of Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Mahrokh Farvardin & Morteza Taki & Shiva Gorjian & Edris Shabani & Julio C. Sosa-Savedra, 2024. "Assessing the Physical and Environmental Aspects of Greenhouse Cultivation: A Comprehensive Review of Conventional and Hydroponic Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:41:y:2023:i:1:id:200-2022-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.