IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6561-d1447179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Viticultural Production in Central European Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Petr Bača

    (Department of Electrotechnology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 10, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Mašán

    (Department of Horticultural Machinery, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Vanýsek

    (Department of Electrotechnology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 10, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Patrik Burg

    (Department of Horticultural Machinery, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic)

  • Tomáš Binar

    (Department of Electrotechnology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 10, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jana Burgová

    (Department of Breeding and Propagation of Horticultural Plants, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic)

  • Zdeněk Abrham

    (Research Institute of Agriculture Engineering, p. r. i., Drnovská 507, 161 01 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

A number of factors will increasingly play a role in the sustainability of wine production in the coming period. The current situation suggests that the analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will play a particularly important role. The so-called carbon footprint, expressed in CO 2 equivalents, is used to express the sum of GHG emissions. This study presents an analysis of vine cultivation in a particular Central European region, with the main focus on quantifying the inputs, yield, fuel consumption, and GHG emissions. The emphasis was placed on conventional, integrated, and ecological production systems of growing, evaluated with the help of the developed AGROTEKIS version 5 software. A total of 30 wine-grower entities in the Morava wine-growing region, the subregion Velké Pavlovice, in the Czech Republic weather climate, were included in the input data survey. By analyzing the aggregated values, the real savings in energy and curbing of CO 2 emissions of vineyards could be observed, relating to individual work procedures with lower energy demand used in the vineyard treatment as well as the amounts and doses of agrochemicals used. The average values of the total impacts did not show any statistically significant differences between the conventional (971 ± 78 kg CO 2 eq·ha −1 ·year −1 ) and integrated production systems (930 ± 62 kg CO 2 eq·ha −1 ·year −1 ), whereas the values for the ecological production system were significantly higher (1479 ± 40 kg CO 2 eq·ha −1 ·year −1 ). The results show that growing vines under ecological production conditions generates a higher proportion of the carbon footprint than under conventional production conditions. Overall, the best results can be achieved in an integrated production system.

Suggested Citation

  • Petr Bača & Vladimír Mašán & Petr Vanýsek & Patrik Burg & Tomáš Binar & Jana Burgová & Zdeněk Abrham, 2024. "Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Viticultural Production in Central European Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6561-:d:1447179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabella Ghiglieno & Anna Simonetto & Luca Facciano & Marco Tonni & Pierluigi Donna & Leonardo Valenti & Gianni Gilioli, 2023. "Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Conventional and Organic Vineyards in Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Yuval Tamar Hefler & Meidad Kissinger, 2023. "Grape Wine Cultivation Carbon Footprint: Embracing a Life Cycle Approach across Climatic Zones," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zixun Guo & Zhimei Gao & Wenbin Zhang, 2023. "Accounting and Decomposition of Energy Footprint: Evidence from 28 Sectors in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Mariana Guerra & Fátima Ferreira & Ana Alexandra Oliveira & Teresa Pinto & Carlos A. Teixeira, 2024. "Drivers of Environmental Sustainability in the Wine Industry: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Gianluca Cavalaglio & Giacomo Fabbrizi & Filippo Cardelli & Leonardo Lorenzi & Mariarosaria Angrisano & Andrea Nicolini, 2024. "Lignocellulosic Residues from Fruit Trees: Availability, Characterization, and Energetic Potential Valorization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6561-:d:1447179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.