IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15483-d979861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Assessment of an Organic Wine Production in Central Italy: Case Study from Lazio

Author

Listed:
  • Giuliana Vinci

    (Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00181 Rome, LT, Italy)

  • Sabrina Antonia Prencipe

    (Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00181 Rome, LT, Italy)

  • Ada Abbafati

    (Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00181 Rome, LT, Italy)

  • Matteo Filippi

    (Azienda Agricola Biologica “Tenute Filippi”, Via Cori Cisterna 67, 04010 Cori, LT, Italy)

Abstract

Growing awareness of environmental sustainability in the agri-food sector has enhanced the gradual shift toward less-impactful food and organic production systems. In 2021, nearly three million hectolitres of organic wine were produced which accounted for 6% of the whole wine production in Italy (50.2 million hectolitres); thus, registering an increase of almost 60% in the last three years. The economic and cultural importance attributed to Italian wine production worldwide represents a key factor to assess and reduce the environmental burdens associated with the activities of this industry. Furthermore, literature studies have highlighted consumer sensitivity for sustainable winemaking processed, and there is even a trend towards eco-friendly wines. In particular, the bottling stage has been identified as an impactful stage for the environmental performance of the wine life cycle. This study examined the environmental impact assessment of organic wine production in the Lazio region, by performing a “cradle-to-gate” approach according to the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. High-quality inventory data for one year of operation was obtained directly from the farming company, “Tenute Filippi” (Cori, Lazio, Italy), and the wine process considered the input from grape cultivation to the winery phases. In these regards, the study also provided an impact assessment for the primary packaging of a 0.75 L wine bottle, with contributions from the different life cycle stages. The results showed a total amount of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) of 1.1 kg CO 2 eq, that are responsible for climate change. Referring to the individual production input, the primary packaging phase accounted for 55% of the total GHGs, with 0.86 kg CO 2 eq per bottle, followed by agricultural fuel use for grape production and harvesting activities, with 0.30 kg CO 2 eq. Building on these results, the study provides recommendations on the selection of the most significant and relevant indicators for the environmental life cycle impact assessment, thus, identifying possible hotspots in the wine sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuliana Vinci & Sabrina Antonia Prencipe & Ada Abbafati & Matteo Filippi, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment of an Organic Wine Production in Central Italy: Case Study from Lazio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15483-:d:979861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paola Masotti & Andrea Zattera & Mario Malagoli & Paolo Bogoni, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of Organic and Biodynamic Wine Produced in Northeast Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Carmen Ferrara & Giovanni De Feo, 2018. "Life Cycle Assessment Application to the Wine Sector: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Mantas Zelba & Tomas Deveikis & Justinas Barakauskas & Artūras Baronas & Saulius Gudžius & Audrius Jonaitis & Andreas Giannakis, 2022. "A Grid-Tied Inverter with Renewable Energy Source Integration in an Off-Grid System with a Functional Experimental Prototype," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouil Tziolas & Eleftherios Karapatzak & Ioannis Kalathas & Chris Lytridis & Spyridon Mamalis & Stefanos Koundouras & Theodore Pachidis & Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of Environmental/Energy Performance under Conventional Labor and Collaborative Robot Scenarios in Greek Viticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Yuval Tamar Hefler & Meidad Kissinger, 2023. "Grape Wine Cultivation Carbon Footprint: Embracing a Life Cycle Approach across Climatic Zones," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Romero, Pascual & Navarro, Josefa María & Ordaz, Pablo Botía, 2022. "Towards a sustainable viticulture: The combination of deficit irrigation strategies and agroecological practices in Mediterranean vineyards. A review and update," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Paola Masotti & Andrea Zattera & Mario Malagoli & Paolo Bogoni, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of Organic and Biodynamic Wine Produced in Northeast Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Mantas Zelba & Tomas Deveikis & Saulius Gudžius & Audrius Jonaitis & Almantas Bandza, 2023. "Review of Power Control Methods for a Variable Average Power Load Model Designed for a Microgrid with Non-Controllable Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Trigo, Ana & Marta-Costa, Ana & Fragoso, Rui, 2023. "Improving sustainability assessment: A context-oriented classification analysis for the wine industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Marc Jourdaine & Philippe Loubet & Stephane Trebucq & Guido Sonnemann, 2020. "A detailed quantitative comparison of the life cycle assessment of bottled wines using an original harmonization procedure," Post-Print hal-03253002, HAL.
    9. Pascual Romero Azorín & José García García, 2020. "The Productive, Economic, and Social Efficiency of Vineyards Using Combined Drought-Tolerant Rootstocks and Efficient Low Water Volume Deficit Irrigation Techniques under Mediterranean Semiarid Condit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Maria Vrublevskaya & Thi Tra My Nguyenová & Lucie Drábová & Petra Lovecká & Blanka Vrchotová & Olga Maťátková & Markéta Kulišová & Irena Jarošová Kolouchová, 2023. "Biodiversity of Vitis vinifera endophytes in conventional and biodynamic vineyard," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(1), pages 44-53.
    11. Sotirios Pilafidis & Eleftherios Kosmas & Ioannis Livieratos & Vasileios D. Gkisakis, 2024. "Assessing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Cretan vineyards for the development of a crop-specific decision support tool," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24415-24452, September.
    12. Nicola Casolani & Emilio Chiodo & Lolita Liberatore, 2023. "Continuous Improvement of VIVA-Certified Wines: Analysis and Perspective of Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Vasileios M. Pappas & Iordanis Samanidis & Giorgos Stavropoulos & Vassilis Athanasiadis & Theodoros Chatzimitakos & Eleni Bozinou & Dimitris P. Makris & Stavros I. Lalas, 2023. "Analysis of Five-Extraction Technologies’ Environmental Impact on the Polyphenols Production from Moringa oleifera Leaves Using the Life Cycle Assessment Tool Based on ISO 14040," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Moritz Wagner & Peter Stanbury & Tabea Dietrich & Johanna Döring & Joachim Ewert & Carlotta Foerster & Maximilian Freund & Matthias Friedel & Claudia Kammann & Mirjam Koch & Tom Owtram & Hans Reiner S, 2023. "Developing a Sustainability Vision for the Global Wine Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    15. Olimpia Martucci & Gabriella Arcese & Chiara Montauti & Alessia Acampora, 2019. "Social Aspects in the Wine Sector: Comparison between Social Life Cycle Assessment and VIVA Sustainable Wine Project Indicators," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    16. José Adolfo Lozano-Miralles & Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez & Alfonso Gago-Calderón & Paulo Brito, 2019. "LCA Case Study to LED Outdoor Luminaries as a Circular Economy Solution to Local Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Eugene Yin Cheung Wong & Danny C. K. Ho & Stuart So & Mark Ching‐Pong Poo, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and production: Modelling product carbon footprint of beverage merchandise using a supply chain input‐process‐output approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 175-188, January.
    18. Amanda J. Trombly & Marie-Odile P. Fortier, 2019. "Carbon Footprint of Wines from the Finger Lakes Region in New York State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15483-:d:979861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.