IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v8y2018i3p26-d154977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Level Dynamics of Collaboration and Conflict in Multi-Party Systems: An Empirical Investigation Using a Behavioural Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Petru Lucian Curseu

    (Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca 400084, Romania
    Department of Organisation, Open University of the Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Sandra Schruijer

    (Utrecht University School of Governance, Utrecht University, Bijlhouwerstraat 6, 3511 ZC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Multiparty systems bring together various stakeholder parties and their representatives and offer a platform for sharing their diverse interests, knowledge and expertise in order to develop and realize joint goals. They display complex relational dynamics in which within-party interactions (interpersonal interactions within each stakeholder party) as well as between-party interactions (interactions between the stakeholder parties) intertwine to generate bottom-up and top-down influences. We investigate these influences in a behavioural simulation. Our results show that changes in task conflict at the stakeholder party level positively predict changes in perceived collaborativeness in the overall system, while changes in relationship conflict at the stakeholder party level positively predict changes in perceived conflictuality in the system. Moreover, we show that changes in perceived overall conflictuality leads to a proportional change in relationship conflict experienced within the stakeholder parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Petru Lucian Curseu & Sandra Schruijer, 2018. "Cross-Level Dynamics of Collaboration and Conflict in Multi-Party Systems: An Empirical Investigation Using a Behavioural Simulation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:26-:d:154977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/3/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/3/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Huxham, 2003. "Theorizing collaboration practice," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 401-423, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oana C. Fodor & Alina M. Fleștea & Iulian Onija & Petru L. Curșeu, 2018. "Networks Originate in Minds: An Exploration of Trust Self-Enhancement and Network Centrality in Multiparty Systems," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Petru Lucian Curșeu & Sandra G.L. Schruijer, 2020. "Participation and Goal Achievement of Multiparty Collaborative Systems Dealing with Complex Problems: A Natural Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Sandra G. L. Schruijer & Petru Lucian Curșeu, 2021. "Distrust, Identification and Collaboration Effectiveness in Multiparty Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Sandra Schruijer, 2020. "The Dynamics of Interorganizational Collaborative Relationships: Introduction," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-9, August.
    5. Sabina Ramona Trif & Petru Lucian Curșeu & Oana Cătălina Fodor, 2023. "Individual Versus Group Negotiation in Multiparty Systems: The Effect of Power and Goal Difficulty on Negotiation Outcomes in a Potential Gain Task," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 209-232, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonal Shree & Yogesh Brahmankar & Ardhendu Shekhar Singh, 2020. "Inmates as Labour Pool: A Case of Inter-organizational Collaboration," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(2), pages 259-272, August.
    2. McNamara Madeleine W., 2011. "Processes of Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Case Study of the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Budiarso & Utomo Sarjono Putro & Yos Sunitiyoso & Rachma Fitriati, 2022. "Constructing the collaborative Working Relationships in one of the Big Four Firms," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 679-709, October.
    4. Alex Burfitt & Stewart Macneill, 2008. "The Challenges of Pursuing Cluster Policy in the Congested State," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 492-505, June.
    5. Alexandru Ionut ROJA & Marian NÃSTASE, 2013. "Leveraging Organizational Capabilities through Collaboration and Collaborative Competitive Advantage," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 359-366, July.
    6. Fredrik Lindencrona & Solvig Ekblad & Runo Axelsson, 2009. "Modes of Interaction and Performance of Human Service Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 191-215, March.
    7. Ki Woong Cho & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "From Collaborative to Hegemonic Water Resource Governance through Dualism and Jeong : Lessons Learned from the Daegu-Gumi Water Intake Source Conflict in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Kate Broadhurst & Jennifer Ferreira & Nigel Berkeley, 2021. "Collaborative leadership and place-based development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 149-163, March.
    9. Lise A. van Oortmerssen & Cees M.J. van Woerkum & Noelle Aarts, 2014. "The Visibility of Trust: Exploring the connection between trust and interaction in a Dutch collaborative governance boardroom," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 666-685, June.
    10. Sidra Irfan, 2021. "Re‐examining the link between collaborative interorganisational relationships and synergistic outcomes in public–private partnerships: Insights from the Punjab Education Foundation's school partnershi," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 79-90, May.
    11. Christina Tsou & Charmaine Green & Gordon Gray & Sandra Claire Thompson, 2018. "Using the Healthy Community Assessment Tool: Applicability and Adaptation in the Midwest of Western Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Annick Willem & Steffie Lucidarme, 2014. "Pitfalls and Challenges for Trust and Effectiveness in Collaborative Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 733-760, June.
    13. José M. Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria, 2010. "Developing a New Framework to Explain Transverse Evolution of Knowledge‐Driven Regional Policy Networks," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 906-924, December.
    14. Eberhard, Rachel & Johnston, Nathan & Everingham, Jo-Anne, 2013. "A collaborative approach to address the cumulative impacts of mine-water discharge: Negotiating a cross-sectoral waterway partnership in the Bowen Basin, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 678-687.
    15. Charlotte Pell, 2016. "Debate: Against collaboration," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 4-5, January.
    16. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2020. "How Do Companies Collaborate for Circular Oriented Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Bibeau, Jean & Meilleur, Roxane & St-Jean, Étienne, 2024. "To formalize, or not to formalize, business incubators’ networks: That is not the question," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Miranda Ebbekink, 2017. "Cluster governance: A practical way out of a congested state of governance plurality," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 621-639, June.
    19. Sonia Tello-Rozas & Marlei Pozzebon & Chantale Mailhot, 2015. "Uncovering Micro-Practices and Pathways of Engagement That Scale Up Social-Driven Collaborations: A Practice View of Power," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(8), pages 1064-1096, December.
    20. John C. Morris & William A. Gibson & William M. Leavitt & Shana C. Jones, 2014. "Collaborative Federalism and the Emerging Role of Local Nonprofits in Water Quality Implementation," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 499-518.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:26-:d:154977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.