IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/07-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Blocking and Accepting Steering from Ministers and Departments. Coping Strategies of Agencies in Flanders

Author

Listed:
  • J. ROMMEL
  • J. CHRISTIAENS

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationships that exist between semi-autonomous agencies, departments and ministers. In theory, agencies have a significant amount of autonomy. However, in practice, this autonomy seems to be hollowed out by both ministers and departments. Politicians no longer are committed to agencification reform in Flanders and attempt to re-centralize. Departments hold a bureaucratic mentality and treat agencies as being lower in rank. However, what emerges from the findings discovered here is that agencies do not accept this passively. Over time, they have developed tactics to ensure their own autonomy. They depict departments as being incompetent and untrustworthy, and even manage to bypass them. Due to the low-level interest of ministers, they manage to shape the reform to their own objectives. These problems can be best described using theories of trust. This analysis suggests that both structural and contextual factors create distrust between agencies, departments and ministers.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Rommel & J. Christiaens, 2007. "Blocking and Accepting Steering from Ministers and Departments. Coping Strategies of Agencies in Flanders," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/431, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:07/431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_07_431.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2001. "NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 73-94, January.
    2. Colin Talbot, 2004. "Executive Agencies: Have They Improved Management in Government?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 104-112, April.
    3. Julian Gould-Williams & Fiona Davies, 2005. "Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of hrm practice on employee outcomes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, March.
    4. J. Rommel & J. Christiaens & C. Devos, 2005. "Rhetorics of Reform : The Case of New Public Management as a Paradigm Shift," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/354, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Roger Wettenhall, 2005. "Agencies and non-departmental public bodies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 615-635, December.
    6. Bob Hudson, 2004. "Analysing network partnerships," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 75-94, March.
    7. Chris Huxham, 2003. "Theorizing collaboration practice," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 401-423, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steffie Lucidarme & Mathieu Marlier & Greet Cardon & Ilse Bourdeaudhuij & Annick Willem, 2014. "Critical success factors for physical activity promotion through community partnerships," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 51-60, February.
    2. Jesús Cambra-Berdún & Jesús Cambra-Fierro, 2006. "Considerations and implications on the necessity of increasing efficiency in the public education system: The new public management (NPM) and the market orientation as reference concepts," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 3(2), pages 41-58, December.
    3. Sonal Shree & Yogesh Brahmankar & Ardhendu Shekhar Singh, 2020. "Inmates as Labour Pool: A Case of Inter-organizational Collaboration," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(2), pages 259-272, August.
    4. McNamara Madeleine W., 2011. "Processes of Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Case Study of the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Sally Sambrook & Delia Wainwright, 2010. "The Psychological Contract: Who's Contracting with Whom? Towards a Conceptual Model," Working Papers 10013, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    6. Daniele Binci, 2013. "L?equilibrio organizzativo attraverso il clima. L?evidenza empirica di un ente locale," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 65-97.
    7. Abd Al-Aziz Al-refaei & Hairuddin Bin Mohd Ali & Ali Ahmed Ateeq & Mohammed Alzoraiki, 2023. "An Integrated Mediating and Moderating Model to Improve Service Quality through Job Involvement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Daniel N. Laven & Daniel H. Krymkowski & Curtis L. Ventriss & Robert E. Manning & Nora J. Mitchell, 2010. "From Partnerships to Networks: New Approaches for Measuring U.S. National Heritage Area Effectiveness," Evaluation Review, , vol. 34(4), pages 271-298, August.
    9. Célia Lemaire & Thierry Nobre, 2014. "Roles D'Un Tableau De Bord Dit « De Pilotage De La Performance » Dans Le Secteur Medico-Social," Post-Print hal-01899569, HAL.
    10. Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Monica Molino & Emanuela Ingusci & Vincenzo Russo & Fulvio Signore & Margherita Zito & Claudio Giovanni Cortese, 2020. "“Everything Will Be Fine”: A Study on the Relationship between Employees’ Perception of Sustainable HRM Practices and Positive Organizational Behavior during COVID19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Dr. Edwinah, Amah & Dr. Joy Adanma Mekuri-Ndimele, 2021. "Inclusive Human Resource Management (IHRM) and Innovative Work Behaviour in Telecommunication Industry in Rivers State," Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 5(2), pages 46-54, February.
    12. Giliberto Capano & Benedetto Lepori, 2024. "Designing policies that could work: understanding the interaction between policy design spaces and organizational responses in public sector," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 53-82, March.
    13. Budiarso & Utomo Sarjono Putro & Yos Sunitiyoso & Rachma Fitriati, 2022. "Constructing the collaborative Working Relationships in one of the Big Four Firms," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 679-709, October.
    14. Alex Burfitt & Stewart Macneill, 2008. "The Challenges of Pursuing Cluster Policy in the Congested State," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 492-505, June.
    15. Alexandru Ionut ROJA & Marian NÃSTASE, 2013. "Leveraging Organizational Capabilities through Collaboration and Collaborative Competitive Advantage," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 359-366, July.
    16. Steffie Lucidarme & Greet Cardon & Annick Willem, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Health Promotion Networks: Configurations of determinants for network effectiveness," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1163-1217, September.
    17. Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42345, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Daniel, Elizabeth & Myers, Andrew & Dixon, Keith, 2012. "Adoption rationales of new management practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 371-380.
    19. Fredrik Lindencrona & Solvig Ekblad & Runo Axelsson, 2009. "Modes of Interaction and Performance of Human Service Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 191-215, March.
    20. Ki Woong Cho & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "From Collaborative to Hegemonic Water Resource Governance through Dualism and Jeong : Lessons Learned from the Daegu-Gumi Water Intake Source Conflict in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:07/431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.