IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i4p132-d677313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Culture and Corporate Performance in the Ecuadorian Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto

    (Escuela de Negocios, Universidad de las Américas, UDLA, Vía a Nayón, Quito 170124, Ecuador)

  • Iliana E. Aguilar-Rodríguez

    (Escuela de Negocios, Universidad de las Américas, UDLA, Vía a Nayón, Quito 170124, Ecuador)

  • Carlos Artieda

    (Escuela de Negocios, Universidad de las Américas, UDLA, Vía a Nayón, Quito 170124, Ecuador)

Abstract

This study examines how organizational culture influences corporate performance in the Ecuadorian service sector. The study employs four organizational culture features and twelve concepts for corporate performance using a self-designed online questionnaire, which were supplied to postgraduate students from academic programs at Universidad de Las Americas (UDLA) in Quito, Ecuador. The respondents were working as managers or employees in small Ecuadorian service firms. The operational items of the questionnaire to measure organizational culture and corporate performance were designed using the Denison model. The findings reveal a statistically positive relationship between organizational culture and firm performance. Moreover, involvement, adaptability, consistency, and mission affect the non-financial performance of the Ecuadorian service sector. Involvement is the critical determinant of the influence of organizational culture on corporate performance, while training shows the strongest association with organizational culture. This study provides a perspective on long-term organizational strategies, vision, and performance. Future research should include the characteristics of the studied firms to increase the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto & Iliana E. Aguilar-Rodríguez & Carlos Artieda, 2021. "Organizational Culture and Corporate Performance in the Ecuadorian Environment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:132-:d:677313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cory Searcy, 2012. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 239-253, May.
    2. Woo Jae Lee, 2019. "Toward Sustainable Accounting Information: Evidence from IFRS Adoption in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Jeong-Ho Koo & Daecheon Yang, 2018. "Managerial Overconfidence, Self-Attribution Bias, and Downwardly Sticky Investment: Evidence from Korea," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 144-161, January.
    4. Giles Atkinson, 2000. "Measuring Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 235-252.
    5. Sai On Cheung & Peter S. P. Wong & Anna L. Lam, 2011. "An investigation of the relationship between organizational culture and the performance of construction organizations," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 688-704, July.
    6. Daniel R. Denison & Robert Hooijberg & Robert E. Quinn, 1995. "Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(5), pages 524-540, October.
    7. Bonavia, Tomas & Prado, Vicente & Barberá, David, 2009. "Adaptación al castellano y estructura factorial del «Denison Organizational Culture Survey» [Spanish adaptation and factor structure of the «Denison Organizational Culture Survey»]," MPRA Paper 34120, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Owino O. Joseph & Francis Kibera, 2019. "Organizational Culture and Performance: Evidence From Microfinance Institutions in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    9. Derek C. Jones & Takao Kato, 2003. "The Effect of Employee Involvment on Firm Performance: Evidence from an Econometric Case Study," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2003-612, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    10. Ignacio Gómez Roldán & Rafael Guillermo Ricardo Bray, 2009. "Similarities and differences existing in cultural profiles of colombian organizations of higher and lower performance," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juliana Abagsonema Abane & Ronald Adamtey & Virceta Owusu Ayim, 2022. "Does organizational culture influence employee productivity at the local level? A test of Denison's culture model in Ghana’s local government sector," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Tassisius Muzivi & Dennis Maravanyika & Ranzi M. Rusikee & Judith Mwenje, 2022. "Factors which Influence the Corporate Culture of an Entity- Analysing the Dynamics of Culture Stability and Inevitable Change," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(4), pages 389-395, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Belen Tulcanaza-Prieto & HoKyun Shin & Younghwan Lee & Chang Won Lee, 2020. "Relationship among CSR Initiatives and Financial and Non-Financial Corporate Performance in the Ecuadorian Banking Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Jordaan, D. & Kirsten, J., 2018. "Measuring the Fragility of Agribusiness Chains: A Case Study of the South African Lamb Chain," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277501, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    4. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Justin J. P. Jansen & Gerard George & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2008. "Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 982-1007, July.
    6. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    8. Thomä, Jakob & Murray, Clare & Jerosch-Herold, Vincent & Magdanz, Janina, 2019. "Do you manage what you measure? Investor views on the question of climate actions with empirical results from the Swiss pension fund and insurance sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115100, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Wu, Zhaohui & Steward, Michelle D. & Hartley, Janet L., 2010. "Wearing many hats: Supply managers' behavioral complexity and its impact on supplier relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 817-823, August.
    10. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    11. repec:ipg:wpaper:40 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. David Audretsch & Jagannadha Pawan Tamvada, 2023. "From entrepreneurship to leadership," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 814-820, April.
    13. Tobias Hahn & Mandy Scheermesser, 2006. "Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 150-165, July.
    14. Nabila Jawadi & Dominique Bonet, 2013. "An examination of the factors influencing relationship building and performance in virtual R&D project teams," Working Papers 2013-40, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    15. Alfonso Siano & Ralph Tench, 2022. "Editorial," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(3), pages 267-270, September.
    16. Hyunmi Ji, 2020. "Financial Analyses and Corporate Evaluation on Sustainable Ability to Generate Excess Profit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Ana Paula Silva & Alexandra Fontes & Carlos Menezes & Tânia Menezes Montenegro, 2023. "Transitioning to an IFRS-Based Accounting System: Longitudinal Insights from Practitioners in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Alice Klettner & Thomas Clarke & Martijn Boersma, 2014. "The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 145-165, June.
    19. Madsen, Mona Toft, 2001. "Leadership and Management Theories Revisited," Working Papers 2001-5, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    20. Rodrigo Lozano & Robin von Haartman, 2018. "Reinforcing the Holistic Perspective of Sustainability: Analysis of the Importance of Sustainability Drivers in Organizations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 508-522, July.
    21. Vera Bitsch & Nicole J. Olynk, 2007. "Skills Required of Managers in Livestock Production: Evidence from Focus Group Research," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 749-764.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:132-:d:677313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.