IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/aardom/2001_005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Leadership and Management Theories Revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Madsen, Mona Toft

    (Department of Organisation and Management, Aarhus School of Business)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to revisit and analyze key contributions to the understanding of leadership and to discuss the relevance of maintaining a distinct line of demarcation between leadership and management. As a part of the discussion a role perspective that allows for additional and/or integrated leader dimensions, including a change-centered, will be outlined. Seemingly, a major challenge on the substantive level is the integration of soft and hard managerial functions, while the concepts used in presenting these should at least in transition be able to contain a distinction between hard, soft, and general practices. Hence a suggestion is made in the end that leadership as a broad concept should be investigated in the future, and various sub-types of leadership reflected by different roles should be used to clarify and concretize managerial functions in general. It is believed that such a convergence will be fruitful and constructive for a continuous development and practice of management at large.

Suggested Citation

  • Madsen, Mona Toft, 2001. "Leadership and Management Theories Revisited," Working Papers 2001-5, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhb:aardom:2001_005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://research.asb.dk/fbspretrieve/8463/mtm_wp2001_5__2_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waldstrøm, Christian, 2001. "Gender Differences and Informal Networks in a Scandinavian Context," Working Papers 2001-4, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    2. Grendstad, Gunnar & Strand, Torodd, 1999. "Organizational types and leadership roles," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 385-403, December.
    3. Ekvall, Göran & Arvonen, Jouko, 1991. "Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 17-26.
    4. Robert E. Quinn & John Rohrbaugh, 1983. "A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 363-377, March.
    5. Daniel R. Denison & Robert Hooijberg & Robert E. Quinn, 1995. "Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(5), pages 524-540, October.
    6. Ulhøi, John P. & Madsen, Henning, 2001. "Trends and patterns in contemporary management in smaller companies: The Danish Perspective," Working Papers 2001-1, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    7. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. "The Principles of Scientific Management," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number taylor1911.
    8. Waldstrøm, Christian, 2001. "Informal Networks in Organizations - A literature review," Working Papers 2001-2, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vera Bitsch & Nicole J. Olynk, 2007. "Skills Required of Managers in Livestock Production: Evidence from Focus Group Research," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 749-764.
    2. Kaciak Eugene & Kozminski Andrzej K., 2019. "Managerial Discretion and Constraints: A Bounded Leadership Model," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(2), pages 3-32, June.
    3. A. Balduck & M. Buelens, 2008. "A Two-Level Competing Values Approach to Measure Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/510, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    4. Glunk, U. & Wilderom, C.P.M., 1996. "Organizational Effectiveness = Corporate Performance? Why and How Two Research Traditions Need to be Merged," Research Memorandum 715, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    6. Chung-Fah Huang & Jieh-Jiuh Wang & Tai-Jun Lin, 2011. "Resource sufficiency, organizational cohesion, and organizational effectiveness of emergency response," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(1), pages 221-234, July.
    7. Glunk, U. & Wilderom, C.P.M., 1996. "Organizational Effectiveness = Corporate Performance? Why and How Two Research Traditions Need to be Merged," Other publications TiSEM e5cdb0ed-7086-4502-8c90-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Shao, Zhen, 2019. "Interaction effect of strategic leadership behaviors and organizational culture on IS-Business strategic alignment and Enterprise Systems assimilation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 96-108.
    9. Jürgen Bott & Udo Milkau, 2018. "Risk Culture and the Role Model of the Honorable Merchant," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, July.
    10. Alina Mirela Teacu (Parincu), 2019. "Neuromanagement – the Impact of Neuroscience on the Organizational Performance," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 487-493.
    11. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Post-Print halshs-03718851, HAL.
    12. Michel Anteby & Curtis K. Chan, 2018. "A Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Coercive Surveillance: Workers’ Invisibility Practices and Managerial Justification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 247-263, April.
    13. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    14. Jeremy Atack & Robert A. Margo & Paul Rhode, 2020. "‘Mechanization Takes Command’: Inanimate Power and Labor Productivity in Late Nineteenth Century American Manufacturing," NBER Working Papers 27436, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Simanchala Das & Biswajit Acharjya, 2021. "Understanding Organisational Effectiveness Through Sustainable Human Relations Approach: The Role of Empowerment Climate in Selected Industrial Establishments," International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 33-52, April.
    16. Treur, Kim A.D. & Van Der Sluis, Lidewey E.C., 2005. "The Benefits of Coaching for Employees and their Organisations," Serie Research Memoranda 0013, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    17. Justin J. P. Jansen & Gerard George & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2008. "Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 982-1007, July.
    18. Ethan Ilzetzki & Saverio Simonelli, 2017. "Measuring Productivity Dispersion: Lessons From Counting One-Hundred Million Ballots," CSEF Working Papers 483, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    19. A. Emre Demirci, 2013. "Strategic Representation of an Abstract Reality: Spiraling Relations between Organizational Culture and Innovativeness," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 39-55, August.
    20. Alpenberg, Jan & Paul Scarbrough, D., 2018. "Trust and control in changing production environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 527-534.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Management; Management theory;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:aardom:2001_005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helle Vinbaek Stenholt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hahoadk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.