IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v111y2018icp113-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible ship loading problem with transfer vehicle assignment and scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Iris, Çağatay
  • Christensen, Jonas
  • Pacino, Dario
  • Ropke, Stefan

Abstract

This paper presents the flexible containership loading problem for seaport container terminals. The integrated management of loading operations, planning of the transport vehicles to use and their scheduling is what we define as the Flexible Ship Loading Problem (FSLP). The flexibility comes from a cooperative agreement between the terminal operator and the liner shipping company, specifying that the terminal has the right to decide which specific container to load for each slot obeying the class-based stowage plan received from the liner. We formulate a mathematical model for the problem. Then we present various modelling enhancements and a mathematical model to obtain strong lower bounds. We also propose a heuristic algorithm to solve the problem. It is shown that enhancements improve the performance of formulation significantly, and the heuristic efficiently generates high-quality solutions. Results also point out that substantial cost savings can be achieved by integrating the ship loading operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Iris, Çağatay & Christensen, Jonas & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2018. "Flexible ship loading problem with transfer vehicle assignment and scheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 113-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:111:y:2018:i:c:p:113-134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261517308196
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monaco, Maria Flavia & Sammarra, Marcello & Sorrentino, Gregorio, 2014. "The Terminal-Oriented Ship Stowage Planning Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 256-265.
    2. Zhen, Lu, 2016. "Modeling of yard congestion and optimization of yard template in container ports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-104.
    3. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    4. Akio Imai & Etsuko Nishimura & Stratos Papadimitriou & Kazuya Sasaki, 2002. "The Containership Loading Problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 4(2), pages 126-148, June.
    5. Parreño, Francisco & Pacino, Dario & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon, 2016. "A GRASP algorithm for the container stowage slot planning problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 141-157.
    6. Türkoğulları, Yavuz B. & Taşkın, Z. Caner & Aras, Necati & Altınel, İ. Kuban, 2016. "Optimal berth allocation, time-variant quay crane assignment and scheduling with crane setups in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 985-1001.
    7. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13.
    8. Goodchild, A.V. & Daganzo, C.F., 2007. "Crane double cycling in container ports: Planning methods and evaluation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 875-891, October.
    9. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan & Larsen, Allan, 2015. "Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem: Set partitioning models and computational results," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-97.
    10. Stefan Ropke & David Pisinger, 2006. "An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Heuristic for the Pickup and Delivery Problem with Time Windows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 455-472, November.
    11. D Ambrosino & A Sciomachen, 2003. "Impact of Yard Organisation on the Master Bay Planning Problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(3), pages 285-300, September.
    12. Imai, Akio & Sasaki, Kazuya & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2006. "Multi-objective simultaneous stowage and load planning for a container ship with container rehandle in yard stacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 373-389, June.
    13. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    14. Kap Hwan Kim & Hoon Lee, 2015. "Container Terminal Operation: Current Trends and Future Challenges," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Chung-Yee Lee & Qiang Meng (ed.), Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics, edition 127, chapter 2, pages 43-73, Springer.
    15. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    16. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    17. George Kontoravdis & Jonathan F. Bard, 1995. "A GRASP for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 10-23, February.
    18. Kap Hwan Kim & Ki Young Kim, 1999. "An Optimal Routing Algorithm for a Transfer Crane in Port Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 17-33, February.
    19. Ambrosino, Daniela & Sciomachen, Anna & Tanfani, Elena, 2004. "Stowing a containership: the master bay plan problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 81-99, February.
    20. Zhen, Lu & Xu, Zhou & Wang, Kai & Ding, Yi, 2016. "Multi-period yard template planning in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 700-719.
    21. Ji, Mingjun & Guo, Wenwen & Zhu, Huiling & Yang, Yongzhi, 2015. "Optimization of loading sequence and rehandling strategy for multi-quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-19.
    22. Jiang, Xin Jia & Jin, Jian Gang, 2017. "A branch-and-price method for integrated yard crane deployment and container allocation in transshipment yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    2. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    3. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    4. Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Wencheng & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Container reshuffling considered space allocation problem in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Lashkari, Shabnam & Wu, Yong & Petering, Matthew E.H., 2017. "Sequencing dual-spreader crane operations: Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 521-534.
    6. Wang, Mengyao & Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Aihu, 2022. "A cluster-based yard template design integrated with yard crane deployment using a placement heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Facchini, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mossa, G., 2020. "Optimal dry port configuration for container terminals: A non-linear model for sustainable decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 164-178.
    8. Kai Wang & Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang, 2018. "Column Generation for the Integrated Berth Allocation, Quay Crane Assignment, and Yard Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 812-834, August.
    9. Sung Won Cho & Hyun Ji Park & Chulung Lee, 2021. "An integrated method for berth allocation and quay crane assignment to allow for reassignment of vessels to other terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 123-153, March.
    10. Rune Larsen & Dario Pacino, 2021. "A heuristic and a benchmark for the stowage planning problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 94-122, March.
    11. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 170-182.
    12. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    14. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.
    15. Xiao-Ming Yang & Xin-Jia Jiang, 2020. "Yard Crane Scheduling in the Ground Trolley-Based Automated Container Terminal," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 37(02), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    17. Fazi, Stefano, 2019. "A decision-support framework for the stowage of maritime containers in inland shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-23.
    18. Correcher, Juan Francisco & Van den Bossche, Thomas & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon & Vanden Berghe, Greet, 2019. "The berth allocation problem in terminals with irregular layouts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1096-1108.
    19. Kress, Dominik & Meiswinkel, Sebastian & Pesch, Erwin, 2019. "Straddle carrier routing at seaport container terminals in the presence of short term quay crane buffer areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 732-750.
    20. Chenhao Zhou & Qitong Zhao & Haobin Li, 2021. "Simulation optimization iteration approach on traffic integrated yard allocation problem in transshipment terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 663-688, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:111:y:2018:i:c:p:113-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.