IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v53y2024i2s0048733323001993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Cinar, Emre
  • Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif
  • Acik, Ahmet Coskun
  • Simms, Chris

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to deepen our knowledge of the typology of public service innovation (PSI) and the role of national context within the context of Singapore, a less studied but highly pertinent context. To accomplish this, our study uses two different methodologies. First, we conduct a systematic review to understand the national context of Singapore. We then utilise Chen et al. (2020) ‘s recent typology to uncover the innovation configuration in the country. To achieve this, our second dataset consists of an analysis of 148 innovations from the United Nations Public Service Award (UNPSA) between 2008 and 2017. The content analysis identifies that Singaporean innovations prioritised consistently an operation focus during the period studied, while the locus shifted from internal to external after 2011 elections. We argue that the new typology is robust to classify innovation in the public services. We also formulate propositions how Singaporean national context influences the innovation types and in which government functions innovations emerge.

Suggested Citation

  • Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:2:s0048733323001993
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323001993
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Hood, 2007. "What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 191-210, June.
    2. Ballot, Gérard & Fakhfakh, Fathi & Galia, Fabrice & Salter, Ammon, 2015. "The fateful triangle: Complementarities in performance between product, process and organizational innovation in France and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 217-232.
    3. Faïz Gallouj & Luis Rubalcaba & Paul Windrum (ed.), 2013. "Public–Private Innovation Networks in Services," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14802, December.
    4. Poh Kam Wong, 2022. "The development of Singapores innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem," Chapters, in: Jerome S. Engel (ed.), Clusters of Innovation in the Age of Disruption, chapter 9, pages 206-244, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Mabel Yeo & Subramaniam Ananthram & Stephen T. T. Teo & Cecil A. Pearson, 2015. "Leader-Member Exchange and Relational Quality in a Singapore Public Sector Organization," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(10), pages 1379-1402, November.
    6. Wang, Jue, 2018. "Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 399-412.
    7. Si Ying Tan & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Governing the adoption of robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care in Singapore [Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 211-231.
    8. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    9. Ho, Yuen-Ping & Ruan, Yi & Hang, Chang-Chieh & Wong, Poh-Kam, 2016. "Technology upgrading of Small-and-Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) through a manpower secondment strategy – A mixed-methods study of Singapore's T-Up program," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 21-29.
    10. Nuttaneeya (Ann) Torugsa & Anthony Arundel, 2016. "Complexity of Innovation in the public sector: A workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 392-416, March.
    11. Fuglsang, Lars & Hansen, Anne Vorre, 2022. "Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    12. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Audretsch, David B., 2017. "Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1681-1691.
    13. Sandford Borins, 2018. "Public sector innovation in a context of radical populism," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(12), pages 1858-1871, December.
    14. Youlang Zhang & Xufeng Zhu, 2019. "Multiple mechanisms of policy diffusion in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 495-514, April.
    15. Paul Windrum, 2008. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Public Services," Chapters, in: Paul Windrum & Per Koch (ed.), Innovation in Public Sector Services, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    17. Mary Bryna Sanger & Martin A. Levin, 1992. "Using old stuff in new ways: Innovation as a case of evolutionary tinkering," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(1), pages 88-115.
    18. Taha Hameduddin & Sergio Fernandez & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu, 2020. "Conditions for open innovation in public organizations: evidence from Challenge.gov," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 111-131, June.
    19. Markus M. Bugge & Carter W. Bloch, 2016. "Between bricolage and breakthroughs—framing the many faces of public sector innovation," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 281-288, May.
    20. Arundel, Anthony & Huber, Dorothea, 2013. "From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 146-159.
    21. Edoardo Ongaro & Ting Gong & Yijia Jing, 2021. "Public administration, context and innovation: A framework of analysis," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 4-11, February.
    22. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu, 2020. "The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(12), pages 1852-1875, December.
    23. Emre Cinar & Paul Trott & Christopher Simms, 2021. "An international exploration of barriers and tactics in the public sector innovation process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 326-353, March.
    24. Mark Moore & Jean Hartley, 2008. "Innovations in governance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 3-20, January.
    25. Bloch, Carter & Bugge, Markus M., 2013. "Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 133-145.
    26. Luc Bernier & Taïeb Hafsi & Carl Deschamps, 2015. "Environmental Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A study of innovation awards in Canada," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 834-856, July.
    27. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Vivona, Roberto, 2021. "Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    28. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    29. Naomi Aoki, 2015. "Institutionalization of New Public Management: The case of Singapore's education system," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 165-186, February.
    30. Ora-orn Poocharoen & Bernard Ting, 2015. "Collaboration, Co-Production, Networks: Convergence of theories," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 587-614, April.
    31. Carsten Greve & Niels Ejersbo & Per Lægreid & Lise H. Rykkja, 2020. "Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 697-710, June.
    32. Poh-Kam Wong, 2007. "Commercializing biomedical science in a rapidly changing “triple-helix” nexus: The experience of the National University of Singapore," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 367-395, August.
    33. Assel Mussagulova, 2021. "Newly independent, path dependent: The impact of the Soviet past on innovation in post-Soviet states," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 87-105, April.
    34. Stefan Kuhlmann & Arie Rip, 2018. "Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 448-454.
    35. Edoardo Ongaro & Ting Gong & Yijia Jing, 2021. "Public administration: Context and innovation," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 3-3, February.
    36. Ian Scott, 2021. "Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 12-22, February.
    37. Sanja Korac & Iris Saliterer & Richard M. Walker, 2017. "Analysing the environmental antecedents of innovation adoption among politicians and public managers," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 566-587, April.
    38. Gonzalez, Reyes & Llopis, Juan & Gasco, Jose, 2013. "Innovation in public services: The case of Spanish local government," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2024-2033.
    39. Rainer Kattel & Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 787-801.
    40. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2019. "Designing institutional platforms and arenas for interactive political leadership," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(10), pages 1443-1463, October.
    41. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    42. Ruth Ang-Tan & Siyuan Ang, 2022. "Understanding the smart city race between Hong Kong and Singapore," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 231-240, May.
    43. Emre Cinar & Paul Trott & Christopher Simms, 2019. "A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 264-290, February.
    44. Jiyao Chen & Richard M. Walker & Mohanbir Sawhney, 2020. "Public service innovation: a typology," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1674-1695, November.
    45. Jean Hartley, 2005. "Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 27-34, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    2. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    3. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Vivona, Roberto, 2021. "Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    4. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Ian Scott, 2021. "Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 12-22, February.
    6. Roberto Vivona & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2023. "The costs of collaborative innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 873-899, June.
    7. Laurin Buchheim & Alexander Krieger & Sarah Arndt, 2020. "Innovation types in public sector organizations: a systematic review of the literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 509-533, November.
    8. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Audretsch, David B., 2017. "Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1681-1691.
    9. Torugsa, Nuttaneeya (Ann) & Arundel, Anthony, 2017. "Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 900-910.
    10. Irena Dokic & Ivana Rasic & Suncana Slijepcevic, 2021. "Innovation in the public services at the local and regional level," Working Papers 2101, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    11. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2019. "Public sector innovation: the effect of universities," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 596-614, April.
    12. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Public Health Innovation through Cloud Adoption: A Comparative Analysis of Drivers and Barriers in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Ilaria Mariani & Irene Bianchi, 2023. "Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    15. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    16. Yoann Queyroi & David Carassus & Christophe Maurel & Christophe Favoreu & Pierre Marin, 2020. "L’innovation publique locale : une analyse de ses impacts perçus en matière de performance publique," Post-Print hal-02933122, HAL.
    17. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "Conditions for complex innovations: evidence from public organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 820-843, June.
    18. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Roberto Vivona, 2021. "Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study [Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 379-396.
    19. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B Audretsch & Timothy F Slaper, 2019. "Sources of innovation and innovation type: firm-level evidence from the United States," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(6), pages 1365-1379.
    20. Fuglsang, Lars & Hansen, Anne Vorre, 2022. "Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:2:s0048733323001993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.