IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v17y2015i6p834-856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A study of innovation awards in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Bernier
  • Taïeb Hafsi
  • Carl Deschamps

Abstract

In this article, we conduct an empirical study of administrative innovation in the Canadian public sector by examining applications to the Innovative Management Award of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). After a review of the literature on innovation in the public sector and of the history of this award, we come to the conclusion that the relationship between innovation and environment has been studied only sparingly, which explains the focus of our research and our hypotheses. Through an analysis of award applications over 21 years, and of award finalists and winners, we demonstrate that such environmental variables as strength of the economy, size of the civil service, deficits, unemployment rate, investment in R&D, and type of government have important consequences for administrative innovation in the public sector. We also suggest some implications of our findings for future research on this subject.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Bernier & Taïeb Hafsi & Carl Deschamps, 2015. "Environmental Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A study of innovation awards in Canada," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 834-856, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:17:y:2015:i:6:p:834-856
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.867066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2013.867066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2013.867066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Hartley & John Benington, 2006. "Copy and Paste, or Graft and Transplant? Knowledge Sharing Through Inter-Organizational Networks," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 101-108, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurin Buchheim & Alexander Krieger & Sarah Arndt, 2020. "Innovation types in public sector organizations: a systematic review of the literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 509-533, November.
    2. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    3. Veiko LEMBER & Ole Helby PETERSEN & Walter SCHERRER & Robert ÅGREN, 2019. "Understanding The Relationship Between Infrastructure Public‒Private Partnerships And Innovation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 371-391, June.
    4. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Havas, Attila & Weber, K. Matthias, 2017. "The 'fit' between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 327-337.
    2. Lummina Horlings & Chris Collinge & John Gibney, 2017. "Relational knowledge leadership and local economic development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(2), pages 95-109, March.
    3. Jäkel Tim, 2019. "Performance Gaps, Peer Effects, and Comparative Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Local Government," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 27-53, June.
    4. Arwin van Buuren & Jasper Eshuis & Nanny Bressers, 2015. "The Governance of Innovation in Dutch Regional Water Management: Organizing fit between organizational values and innovative concepts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 679-697, May.
    5. Jean Hartley, 2014. "New development: Eight and a half propositions to stimulate frugal innovation," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 227-232, May.
    6. Jean Hartley, 2017. "Optimism of the will in the cocreation and use of research by academics and practitioners," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 236-239, June.
    7. Tønnessen, Øystein & Dhir, Amandeep & Flåten, Bjørn-Tore, 2021. "Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Cheng, Jao-Hong, 2011. "Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing in green supply chains—Moderating by relational benefits and guanxi," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 837-849.
    9. Jenke, Michael & Pretzsch, Jürgen, 2021. "Network administrators facilitate information sharing among communal forest organizations in Thailand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Christer Theandersson & Bertil Rolandsson, 2013. "Preventing Cooperative Knowledge Production From Falling Apart," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, November.
    11. Allen, April D. & Hyde, Justeen & Leslie, Laurel K., 2012. "“I Don't Know What They Know”: Knowledge transfer in mandated referral from child welfare to early intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1050-1059.
    12. Patrick Reichert & Marek Hudon & Ariane Szafarz & Robert K. Christensen, 2021. "Crowding-In or Crowding-Out? How Subsidies Signal the Path to Financial Independence of Social Enterprises," Working Papers CEB 21-014, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Leonor Barroca & Helen Sharp & Dina Salah & Katie Taylor & Peggy Gregory, 2018. "Bridging the gap between research and agile practice: an evolutionary model," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(2), pages 323-334, April.
    14. Fussell, Cathy, 2023. "What at power-with looks like and why we should choose it," SocArXiv fky6t, Center for Open Science.
    15. Weber, K. Matthias & Heller-Schuh, Barbara & Godoe, Helge & Roeste, Rannveig, 2014. "ICT-enabled system innovations in public services: Experiences from intelligent transport systems," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 539-557.
    16. Cheng, Jao-Hong & Fu, Ya-Chi, 2013. "Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing through the relationship and institutional orientations in supply chains," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 473-484.
    17. Cheng, Jao-Hong, 2011. "Inter-organizational relationships and information sharing in supply chains," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 374-384.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:17:y:2015:i:6:p:834-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.