IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v58y2016icp450-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Guan, Guoqing
  • Kaewpanha, Malinee
  • Hao, Xiaogang
  • Abudula, Abuliti

Abstract

Tar is unavoidable by-product during biomass gasification process. Catalytic steam reforming of tar to syngas is a promising way for the removal of tar from the gas products. However, the key issue for this way is catalyst development. To date, the developed catalysts always have advantages and disadvantages: nickel-based catalysts have high activity, but they are easily deactivated by coking; noble metal based catalysts have high catalytic activity, long-term stability and high carbon deposition resistance, but they are expensive; other transition metal catalysts such as Fe, Co and Cu exhibit a good performance, but they are also deactivated easily by carbon deposition in the case of high heavy-tar content in the tar; alkali metal catalysts also have high catalytic activity for tar reforming, but they are easy to be evaporated with the generated gases; natural catalysts have been widely applied for the steam reforming of tar due to its inexpensive, abundant and disposable, but their catalytic activities are lower than those man-made ones, and especially have low mechanical strength, making them not suitable to be used in fluidized bed reactor; zeolite is suggested to be a good catalyst support due to its high thermal/hydrothermal stability, high resistance to sulfur compounds, and easy to be regenerated; biomass char has been used as the catalyst or catalyst support in the steam reforming of tar due to its low cost and its natural production inside the biomass gasifier; even biomass ash now is considered to be a good catalyst for tar removal. In this review, to get better understanding of the mechanism of catalytic steam reforming of tar derived from biomass, tar formation, tar properties and catalytic reaction mechanism are also introduced, and prospects and challenges are summarized.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:450-461
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115016998
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anis, Samsudin & Zainal, Z.A., 2011. "Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2355-2377, June.
    2. Udomsirichakorn, Jakkapong & Salam, P. Abdul, 2014. "Review of hydrogen-enriched gas production from steam gasification of biomass: The prospect of CaO-based chemical looping gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 565-579.
    3. Wang, Duo & Yuan, Wenqiao & Ji, Wei, 2011. "Char and char-supported nickel catalysts for secondary syngas cleanup and conditioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1656-1663, May.
    4. Göransson, Kristina & Söderlind, Ulf & He, Jie & Zhang, Wennan, 2011. "Review of syngas production via biomass DFBGs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 482-492, January.
    5. Devi, Lopamudra & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G. & van Paasen, Sander V.B. & Bergman, Patrick C.A. & Kiel, Jacob H.A., 2005. "Catalytic decomposition of biomass tars: use of dolomite and untreated olivine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 565-587.
    6. Berrueco, C. & Montané, D. & Matas Güell, B. & del Alamo, G., 2014. "Effect of temperature and dolomite on tar formation during gasification of torrefied biomass in a pressurized fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 849-859.
    7. Alauddin, Zainal Alimuddin Bin Zainal & Lahijani, Pooya & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2010. "Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2852-2862, December.
    8. Kirkels, Arjan F. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2011. "Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 471-481, January.
    9. Shen, Yafei & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2013. "Recent progresses in catalytic tar elimination during biomass gasification or pyrolysis—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 371-392.
    10. Damartzis, T. & Zabaniotou, A., 2011. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 366-378, January.
    11. Li, Chunshan & Suzuki, Kenzi, 2009. "Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification--An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 594-604, April.
    12. Bhandari, Pushpak N. & Kumar, Ajay & Bellmer, Danielle D. & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2014. "Synthesis and evaluation of biochar-derived catalysts for removal of toluene (model tar) from biomass-generated producer gas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 346-353.
    13. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    14. Parthasarathy, Prakash & Narayanan, K. Sheeba, 2014. "Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 570-579.
    15. Emami Taba, Leila & Irfan, Muhammad Faisal & Wan Daud, Wan Ashri Mohd & Chakrabarti, Mohammed Harun, 2012. "The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5584-5596.
    16. Ajay Kumar & David D. Jones & Milford A. Hanna, 2009. "Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-26, July.
    17. Han, Jun & Kim, Heejoon, 2008. "The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 397-416, February.
    18. Rizkiana, Jenny & Guan, Guoqing & Widayatno, Wahyu Bambang & Hao, Xiaogang & Li, Xiumin & Huang, Wei & Abudula, Abuliti, 2014. "Promoting effect of various biomass ashes on the steam gasification of low-rank coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 282-288.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Yafei, 2015. "Chars as carbonaceous adsorbents/catalysts for tar elimination during biomass pyrolysis or gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 281-295.
    2. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    3. Rakesh N, & Dasappa, S., 2018. "A critical assessment of tar generated during biomass gasification - Formation, evaluation, issues and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1045-1064.
    4. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, R.G. & Matos, M.A.A. & Frade, J.R. & Yaremchenko, A. & Mishra, G.S. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2018. "Low-cost catalysts for in-situ improvement of producer gas quality during direct gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 442-454.
    5. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2017. "The fate of SOFC anodes under biomass producer gas contaminants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1050-1066.
    6. Shen, Yafei & Wang, Junfeng & Ge, Xinlei & Chen, Mindong, 2016. "By-products recycling for syngas cleanup in biomass pyrolysis – An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1246-1268.
    7. Ma, Zhongqing & Zhang, Yimeng & Zhang, Qisheng & Qu, Yongbiao & Zhou, Jianbin & Qin, Hengfei, 2012. "Design and experimental investigation of a 190 kWe biomass fixed bed gasification and polygeneration pilot plant using a double air stage downdraft approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 140-147.
    8. Qian, Kezhen & Kumar, Ajay & Zhang, Hailin & Bellmer, Danielle & Huhnke, Raymond, 2015. "Recent advances in utilization of biochar," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1055-1064.
    9. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    11. Gao, Ningbo & Salisu, Jamilu & Quan, Cui & Williams, Paul, 2021. "Modified nickel-based catalysts for improved steam reforming of biomass tar: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.
    13. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    15. Hu, Fu-Xiang & Yang, Guo-Hua & Ding, Guo-Zhu & Li, Zhen & Du, Ka-Shuai & Hu, Zhi-Fa & Tian, Su-Rui, 2016. "Experimental study on catalytic cracking of model tar compounds in a dual layer granular bed filter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 47-57.
    16. Ahsanullah Soomro & Shiyi Chen & Shiwei Ma & Wenguo Xiang, 2018. "Catalytic activities of nickel, dolomite, and olivine for tar removal and H2-enriched gas production in biomass gasification process," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 839-867, September.
    17. Huang, Zhen & Zheng, Anqing & Deng, Zhengbing & Wei, Guoqiang & Zhao, Kun & Chen, Dezhen & He, Fang & Zhao, Zengli & Li, Haibin & Li, Fanxing, 2020. "In-situ removal of toluene as a biomass tar model compound using NiFe2O4 for application in chemical looping gasification oxygen carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    18. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Anis, Samsudin & Zainal, Z.A., 2011. "Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2355-2377, June.
    20. Nakamura, Shunsuke & Kitano, Shigeru & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2016. "Biomass gasification process with the tar removal technologies utilizing bio-oil scrubber and char bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 186-192.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:450-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.