IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v105y2019icp252-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Inayat, Muddasser
  • Sulaiman, Shaharin A.
  • Kurnia, Jundika Candra
  • Shahbaz, Muhammad

Abstract

Gasification is a well proven thermal conversion technology that has been used to convert solid fuel into gaseous fuel. There are different types of conventional feedstocks such as coal and biomass that have been gasified in either individual or blended form. The advantage of co-gasification over typical gasification is the ability to obtain the desired product gas composition by varying the blending ratio and feedstock. Furthermore, it is applicable for many feedstocks such as sewage sludge, black liquor, glycerol, and municipal solid waste. These feedstocks have good thermophysical properties, however, gasification of these feedstocks is difficult using a conventional technique, thus highlighting the need for co-gasification. Recently, the effect of feedstock type and their blending for syngas production have attracted interest among researchers especially when feedstocks are non-conventional. Several review articles have been published on gasification of individual coal and biomass. However, no review that exhaustively dealt with the catalytic co-gasification of a different kind of conventional and non-conventional feedstock. The feedstock type and blending ratio of feedstock are the most important parameters that affect the co-gasification process. The objective of the current paper is therefore to review the effect of feedstock type and their blending ratio on syngas quality, co-gasification performance, and tar formation for catalytic co-gasification of both conventional and non-conventional feedstocks. This review highlights the need for research and development in co-gasification and also provides the research gap for further research to develop a state of art technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:252-267
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211930084X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oladejo, Jumoke & Adegbite, Stephen & Gao, Xiang & Liu, Hao & Wu, Tao, 2018. "Catalytic and non-catalytic synergistic effects and their individual contributions to improved combustion performance of coal/biomass blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 334-345.
    2. Saidur, R. & Abdelaziz, E.A. & Demirbas, A. & Hossain, M.S. & Mekhilef, S., 2011. "A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2262-2289, June.
    3. Göransson, Kristina & Söderlind, Ulf & He, Jie & Zhang, Wennan, 2011. "Review of syngas production via biomass DFBGs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 482-492, January.
    4. Irfan, Muhammad F. & Usman, Muhammad R. & Kusakabe, K., 2011. "Coal gasification in CO2 atmosphere and its kinetics since 1948: A brief review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 12-40.
    5. Alauddin, Zainal Alimuddin Bin Zainal & Lahijani, Pooya & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2010. "Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2852-2862, December.
    6. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 201-215.
    7. Arena, Umberto & Di Gregorio, Fabrizio, 2014. "Energy generation by air gasification of two industrial plastic wastes in a pilot scale fluidized bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 735-743.
    8. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Lim, C. Jim & Ellis, Naoko, 2015. "From fossil fuels towards renewables: Inhibitory and catalytic effects on carbon thermochemical conversion during co-gasification of biomass with fossil fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 196-209.
    9. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Ellis, Naoko & Lim, C. Jim & Butler, James W., 2015. "Biomass/coal steam co-gasification integrated with in-situ CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 326-336.
    10. Oladejo, Jumoke M. & Adegbite, Stephen & Pang, Cheng Heng & Liu, Hao & Parvez, Ashak M. & Wu, Tao, 2017. "A novel index for the study of synergistic effects during the co-processing of coal and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 215-225.
    11. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    12. Ahmad, Anis Atikah & Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah & Kasim, Farizul Hafiz & Inayat, Abrar & Khasri, Azduwin, 2016. "Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1333-1347.
    13. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    14. Wang, Guangwei & Zhang, Jianliang & Zhang, Guohua & Ning, Xiaojun & Li, Xinyu & Liu, Zhengjian & Guo, Jian, 2017. "Experimental and kinetic studies on co-gasification of petroleum coke and biomass char blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 27-40.
    15. Lee, Jung Soo & Kim, Sang Done, 1996. "Gasification kinetics of waste tire-char with CO2 in a thermobalance reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 343-352.
    16. Moghadam, Reza Alipour & Yusup, Suzana & Uemura, Yoshimitsu & Chin, Bridgid Lai Fui & Lam, Hon Loong & Al Shoaibi, Ahmed, 2014. "Syngas production from palm kernel shell and polyethylene waste blend in fluidized bed catalytic steam co-gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 40-44.
    17. Patra, Tapas Kumar & Sheth, Pratik N., 2015. "Biomass gasification models for downdraft gasifier: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 583-593.
    18. Zhang, Ziyin & Pang, Shusheng & Levi, Tana, 2017. "Influence of AAEM species in coal and biomass on steam co-gasification of chars of blended coal and biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 356-363.
    19. Emami Taba, Leila & Irfan, Muhammad Faisal & Wan Daud, Wan Ashri Mohd & Chakrabarti, Mohammed Harun, 2012. "The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5584-5596.
    20. Link, Siim & Arvelakis, Stelios & Paist, Aadu & Liliedahl, Truls & Rosén, Christer, 2018. "Effect of leaching pretreatment on the gasification of wine and vine (residue) biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-5.
    21. Ajay Kumar & David D. Jones & Milford A. Hanna, 2009. "Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-26, July.
    22. Cho, Min-Hwan & Mun, Tae-Young & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2013. "Air gasification of mixed plastic wastes using calcined dolomite and activated carbon in a two-stage gasifier to reduce tar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 299-305.
    23. Kirubakaran, V. & Sivaramakrishnan, V. & Nalini, R. & Sekar, T. & Premalatha, M. & Subramanian, P., 2009. "A review on gasification of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 179-186, January.
    24. Ma, Xinyue & Zhao, Xue & Gu, Jiyou & Shi, Junyou, 2019. "Co-gasification of coal and biomass blends using dolomite and olivine as catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 509-514.
    25. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Lim, C. Jim & Ellis, Naoko & Li, Yong Hua & Watkinson, A. Paul, 2015. "From coal towards renewables: Catalytic/synergistic effects during steam co-gasification of switchgrass and coal in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 918-930.
    26. Wei, Juntao & Guo, Qinghua & Ding, Lu & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Yu, Guangsuo, 2017. "Synergy mechanism analysis of petroleum coke and municipal solid waste (MSW)-derived hydrochar co-gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1354-1363.
    27. Goyal, H.B. & Seal, Diptendu & Saxena, R.C., 2008. "Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 504-517, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    3. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    4. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Pongrácz, Eva & Fabritius, Timo, 2013. "The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 511-528.
    5. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    6. Salem, Ahmed M. & Elsherbiny, Khaled, 2022. "Innovative concept for the effect of changing gasifying medium and injection points on syngas quality: Towards higher H2 production, and Free-CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    7. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    8. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    9. Rakesh N, & Dasappa, S., 2018. "A critical assessment of tar generated during biomass gasification - Formation, evaluation, issues and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1045-1064.
    10. ABM Abdul Malek & M Hasanuzzaman & Nasrudin A Rahim & Yusuf A Al–Turki, 2021. "Energy, economic, and environmental analysis of 10-MW biomass gasification based power generation in Malaysia," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(2), pages 295-337, March.
    11. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    12. Yahaya, Ahmad Zubair & Somalu, Mahendra Rao & Muchtar, Andanastuti & Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli, 2019. "Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 931-940.
    13. Salem, Ahmed M. & Abd Elbar, Ayman Refat, 2023. "The feasibility and performance of using producer gas as a gasifying medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    14. Jha, Gaurav & Soren, S., 2017. "Study on applicability of biomass in iron ore sintering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 399-407.
    15. Wei, Juntao & Guo, Qinghua & Gong, Yan & Ding, Lu & Yu, Guangsuo, 2020. "Effect of biomass leachates on structure evolution and reactivity characteristic of petroleum coke gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 111-120.
    16. Parrillo, Francesco & Ardolino, Filomena & Boccia, Carmine & Calì, Gabriele & Marotto, Davide & Pettinau, Alberto & Arena, Umberto, 2023. "Co-gasification of plastics waste and biomass in a pilot scale fluidized bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    17. Alejandro Lyons Cerón & Alar Konist & Heidi Lees & Oliver Järvik, 2021. "Effect of Woody Biomass Gasification Process Conditions on the Composition of the Producer Gas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Yuan, XiangZhou & Fan, ShuMin & Choi, Seung Wan & Kim, Hyung-Taek & Lee, Ki Bong, 2017. "Potassium catalyst recovery process and performance evaluation of the recovered catalyst in the K2CO3-catalyzed steam gasification system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 850-860.
    19. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    20. Yu, Xin & Yu, Dunxi & Liu, Fangqi & Han, Jingkun & Wu, Jianqun & Xu, Minghou, 2022. "Synergistic effects, gas evolution and ash interaction during isothermal steam co-gasification of biomass with high-sulfur petroleum coke," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:252-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.