IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v57y2016icp250-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for adaptive behaviors satisfaction assessment with energy efficient building design

Author

Listed:
  • Shafaghat, Arezou
  • Keyvanfar, Ali
  • Abd. Majid, Muhd Zaimi
  • Lamit, Hasanuddin Bin
  • Ahmad, Mohd Hamdan
  • Ferwati, Mohamed Salim
  • Ghoshal, Sib Krishna

Abstract

Efficient and accurate methods and models are ever-demanding to determining the user satisfaction in energy efficient buildings. Thus, several techniques are developed based on sustainable building assessment tools and standards to achieve such target. However, the user satisfaction from adaptive behavior in the design phase of buildings lifecycle is never addressed. This paper attempts to identify the most applicable data input method to measure the satisfaction from adaptive behavior with energy efficient buildings in their design phase. A comprehensive literature survey on all user satisfaction data input methods is conducted to serve the taxonomy by classifying them into two major clusters depending on performance and perception. Kano method to measure satisfaction perception from cognitive experience is demonstrated to be the most suitable user satisfaction data input method. Furthermore, Kano method can delicately assist energy efficient building design consultants to assess the user contentment requirements for sustainable building accreditation effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Shafaghat, Arezou & Keyvanfar, Ali & Abd. Majid, Muhd Zaimi & Lamit, Hasanuddin Bin & Ahmad, Mohd Hamdan & Ferwati, Mohamed Salim & Ghoshal, Sib Krishna, 2016. "Methods for adaptive behaviors satisfaction assessment with energy efficient building design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 250-259.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:250-259
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115015166
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taleghani, Mohammad & Tenpierik, Martin & Kurvers, Stanley & van den Dobbelsteen, Andy, 2013. "A review into thermal comfort in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 201-215.
    2. Loveday, D. L. & Virk, G. S., 1992. "Artificial intelligence for buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 201-221.
    3. Jasper Mbachu & Raymond Nkado, 2006. "Conceptual framework for assessment of client needs and satisfaction in the building development process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 31-44.
    4. Chung, William, 2011. "Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1470-1479, May.
    5. Chowdhury, Ashfaque Ahmed & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K., 2008. "Thermal-comfort analysis and simulation for various low-energy cooling-technologies applied to an office building in a subtropical climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(6), pages 449-462, June.
    6. David Lorenz & Thomas Lützkendorf, 2008. "Sustainability in property valuation: theory and practice," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(6), pages 482-521, September.
    7. Yu, Zhun (Jerry) & Haghighat, Fariborz & Fung, Benjamin C.M. & Morofsky, Edward & Yoshino, Hiroshi, 2011. "A methodology for identifying and improving occupant behavior in residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6596-6608.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elina Dace & Agnis Stibe & Lelde Timma, 2020. "A holistic approach to manage environmental quality by using the Kano model and social cognitive theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 430-443, March.
    2. Minyoung Kwon & Hilde Remøy & Andy Van den Dobbelsteen & Ulrich Knaack, 2017. "User-focused design factors of workspace for nearly zero energy office renovation: findings from literature review," ERES eres2017_275, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    3. Jam Shahzaib Khan & Rozana Zakaria & Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin & Nur Izie Adiana Abidin & Shaza Rina Sahamir & Darul Nafis Abbas & Eeydzah Aminudin, 2019. "Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Lee, Junghun & Kim, Jeonggook & Song, Doosam & Kim, Jonghun & Jang, Cheolyong, 2017. "Impact of external insulation and internal thermal density upon energy consumption of buildings in a temperate climate with four distinct seasons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1081-1088.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keyvanfar, Ali & Shafaghat, Arezou & Abd Majid, Muhd Zaimi & Bin Lamit, Hasanuddin & Warid Hussin, Mohd & Binti Ali, Kherun Nita & Dhafer Saad, Alshahri, 2014. "User satisfaction adaptive behaviors for assessing energy efficient building indoor cooling and lighting environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 277-295.
    2. Taleghani, Mohammad & Tenpierik, Martin & van den Dobbelsteen, Andy, 2014. "Energy performance and thermal comfort of courtyard/atrium dwellings in the Netherlands in the light of climate change," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 486-497.
    3. Yang, Liu & Yan, Haiyan & Lam, Joseph C., 2014. "Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 164-173.
    4. Tomasz Jałowiec & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2021. "Analysis of the RES Potential in Accordance with the Energy Policy of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-33, September.
    5. Bishnu Nepal & Motoi Yamaha & Hiroya Sahashi & Aya Yokoe, 2019. "Analysis of Building Electricity Use Pattern Using K-Means Clustering Algorithm by Determination of Better Initial Centroids and Number of Clusters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Wang, Nan & Wang, Julian & Feng, Yanxiao, 2022. "Systematic review: Acute thermal effects of artificial light in the daytime," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Burillo, Daniel & Chester, Mikhail V. & Pincetl, Stephanie & Fournier, Eric, 2019. "Electricity infrastructure vulnerabilities due to long-term growth and extreme heat from climate change in Los Angeles County," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 943-953.
    8. Chih-Hong Huang & Hsin-Hua Tsai & Hung-chen Chen, 2020. "Influence of Weather Factors on Thermal Comfort in Subtropical Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Desideri, Umberto & Leonardi, Daniela & Arcioni, Livia & Sdringola, Paolo, 2012. "European project Educa-RUE: An example of energy efficiency paths in educational buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 384-395.
    10. Bian, Yiwen & He, Ping & Xu, Hao, 2013. "Estimation of potential energy saving and carbon dioxide emission reduction in China based on an extended non-radial DEA approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 962-971.
    11. Van Craenendonck, Stijn & Lauriks, Leen & Vuye, Cedric & Kampen, Jarl, 2018. "A review of human thermal comfort experiments in controlled and semi-controlled environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3365-3378.
    12. Ahmet Bircan Atmaca & Gülay Zorer Gedik & Andreas Wagner, 2021. "Determination of Optimum Envelope of Religious Buildings in Terms of Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption: Mosque Cases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Antonio Paone & Jean-Philippe Bacher, 2018. "The Impact of Building Occupant Behavior on Energy Efficiency and Methods to Influence It: A Review of the State of the Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Cao, Jingyu & Hong, Xiaoqiang & Zheng, Zhanying & Asim, Muhammad & Hu, Mingke & Wang, Qiliang & Pei, Gang & Leung, Michael K.H., 2020. "Performance characteristics of variable conductance loop thermosyphon for energy-efficient building thermal control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    15. Mohammed Awad Abuhussain & Nedhal Al-Tamimi & Badr S. Alotaibi & Manoj Kumar Singh & Sanjay Kumar & Rana Elnaklah, 2022. "Impact of Courtyard Concept on Energy Efficiency and Home Privacy in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & de’ Rossi, Filippo & Turni, Gianluca & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2013. "Green roofs in European climates. Are effective solutions for the energy savings in air-conditioning?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 845-859.
    17. Enescu, Diana, 2017. "A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1353-1379.
    18. Wang, Zhe & Hong, Tianzhen, 2020. "Learning occupants’ indoor comfort temperature through a Bayesian inference approach for office buildings in United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    20. Nappi-Choulet, Ingrid & Décamps, Aurélien, 2011. "Is Sustainability Attractive for Corporate Real Estate Decisions ?," ESSEC Working Papers WP1106, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:250-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.