IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i1p6-d196420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jam Shahzaib Khan

    (School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Rozana Zakaria

    (School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin

    (Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Survey, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nur Izie Adiana Abidin

    (School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Shaza Rina Sahamir

    (Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Survey, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Darul Nafis Abbas

    (School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Eeydzah Aminudin

    (School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

“Green Buildings” are essential in being responsive to the challenges of climate change and global warming while inhibiting natural resources degradation. This demand requires specific attention to increase the adoption of green-certified buildings within the construction industry. Innovative tools and techniques are needed to meet global challenges and strategies set for Sustainable Development Goals of 2030 agenda. This paper provides an intensive review of the evolution of green buildings from a sustainable development perspective which investigates the current global adoption of green buildings. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Selective Critical Literature Review Analysis (SCLRA) methodologies were adopted focusing on the content analysis to develop more in-depth knowledge. The scope of this study enlightens the sustainable development goals and initiatives. This paper highlighted that there is still inadequate adoption of green buildings and their rating tools on a significant basis in developing countries. This research adds a method towards the better understanding of green buildings and current scenarios that shall be considered for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jam Shahzaib Khan & Rozana Zakaria & Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin & Nur Izie Adiana Abidin & Shaza Rina Sahamir & Darul Nafis Abbas & Eeydzah Aminudin, 2019. "Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:6-:d:196420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiel, Chris & Leal Filho, Walter & do Paço, Arminda & Brandli, Luciana, 2016. "Evaluating the engagement of universities in capacity building for sustainable development in local communities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 123-134.
    2. Chandratilake, S.R. & Dias, W.P.S., 2015. "Ratio based indicators and continuous score functions for better assessment of building sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 137-143.
    3. Shafaghat, Arezou & Keyvanfar, Ali & Abd. Majid, Muhd Zaimi & Lamit, Hasanuddin Bin & Ahmad, Mohd Hamdan & Ferwati, Mohamed Salim & Ghoshal, Sib Krishna, 2016. "Methods for adaptive behaviors satisfaction assessment with energy efficient building design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 250-259.
    4. Sadineni, Suresh B. & France, Todd M. & Boehm, Robert F., 2011. "Economic feasibility of energy efficiency measures in residential buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2925-2931.
    5. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    6. Phillis, Yannis A. & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, Luc A., 2001. "Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 435-456, June.
    7. Keyvanfar, Ali & Shafaghat, Arezou & Abd Majid, Muhd Zaimi & Bin Lamit, Hasanuddin & Warid Hussin, Mohd & Binti Ali, Kherun Nita & Dhafer Saad, Alshahri, 2014. "User satisfaction adaptive behaviors for assessing energy efficient building indoor cooling and lighting environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 277-295.
    8. GhaffarianHoseini, AmirHosein & Dahlan, Nur Dalilah & Berardi, Umberto & GhaffarianHoseini, Ali & Makaremi, Nastaran & GhaffarianHoseini, Mahdiar, 2013. "Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: A review of current theories, implementations and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-17.
    9. Olubunmi, Olanipekun Ayokunle & Xia, Paul Bo & Skitmore, Martin, 2016. "Green building incentives: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1611-1621.
    10. Queena K. Qian & Edwin H. W. Chan & Abd Ghani Khalid, 2015. "Challenges in Delivering Green Building Projects: Unearthing the Transaction Costs (TCs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Stelios Grafakos & Alberto Gianoli & Alexandra Tsatsou, 2016. "Towards the Development of an Integrated Sustainability and Resilience Benefits Assessment Framework of Urban Green Growth Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lihua Liang & Baohua Wen & Feng Xu & Jianwei Yan & Xiangqi Yan & S. Ramesh, 2021. "Linking the Development of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools with the Concept Evolution of Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Ja Young Eunice Kim, 2023. "The Multi-Faceted Practice of Architectural Sustainability Found in the Regional Architecture of Vorarlberg, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Pamela Del Rosario & Elisabetta Palumbo & Marzia Traverso, 2021. "Environmental Product Declarations as Data Source for the Environmental Assessment of Buildings in the Context of Level(s) and DGNB: How Feasible Is Their Adoption?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Katundu Imasiku & Valerie Thomas & Etienne Ntagwirumugara, 2019. "Unraveling Green Information Technology Systems as a Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Game-Changer," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Najwa Syahirah Mohamed Nor Izam & Zarina Itam & Wong Leong Sing & Agusril Syamsir, 2022. "Sustainable Development Perspectives of Solar Energy Technologies with Focus on Solar Photovoltaic—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Apostolopoulos, Vasilis & Mamounakis, Ioannis & Seitaridis, Andreas & Tagkoulis, Nikolas & Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios & Iliadis, Petros & Angelakoglou, Komninos & Nikolopoulos, Nikolaos, 2023. "Αn integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach towards sustainable building renovation via a dynamic online tool," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    7. Antonio Sianes, 2021. "Academic Research on the 2030 Agenda: Challenges of a Transdisciplinary Field of Study," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 286-297, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarkko Levänen & Mokter Hossain & Tatu Lyytinen & Anne Hyvärinen & Sini Numminen & Minna Halme, 2015. "Implications of Frugal Innovations on Sustainable Development: Evaluating Water and Energy Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Umberto Berardi, 2013. "Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1573-1591, December.
    3. Rabee Rustum & Anu Mary John Kurichiyanil & Shaun Forrest & Corrado Sommariva & Adebayo J. Adeloye & Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani & Miklas Scholz, 2020. "Sustainability Ranking of Desalination Plants Using Mamdani Fuzzy Logic Inference Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Paulína Šujanová & Monika Rychtáriková & Tiago Sotto Mayor & Affan Hyder, 2019. "A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    5. Wenxin Shen & Wenzhe Tang & Atthaset Siripanan & Zhen Lei & Colin F. Duffield & Felix Kin Peng Hui, 2018. "Understanding the Green Technical Capabilities and Barriers to Green Buildings in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Rodriguez, Rocio & Svensson, Göran & Otero-Neira, Carmen, 2019. "Framing sustainable development through descriptive determinants in private hospitals – Orientation and organization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 78-88.
    7. Juana Rivera-Lirio & María Muñoz-Torres, 2010. "The Effectiveness of the Public Support Policies for the European Industry Financing as a Contribution to Sustainable Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(4), pages 489-515, July.
    8. Andriantiatsaholiniaina, Luc A. & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. & Phillis, Yannis A., 2004. "Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 149-172, February.
    9. Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Fausto Cavallaro & Abbas Mardani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Sarminah Samad & Othman Ibrahim, 2018. "Measuring Country Sustainability Performance Using Ensembles of Neuro-Fuzzy Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2017. "Exposing the attractors of evolving complex adaptive systems by utilising futures images: Milestones of the food sustainability journey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 214-225.
    11. Ernesto Leon-Castro & Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Victor Alfaro-Garcia & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Jose M. Merigo, 2021. "Fuzzy systems in innovation and sustainability," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 377-383, December.
    12. Dara K. Dimitrov & Howard Davey, 2011. "Sustainable development: what it means to CFOs of New Zealand," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 86-108, May.
    13. Eleonora Bottani & Maria Carmen Gentilotti & Marta Rinaldi, 2017. "A Fuzzy Logic-Based Tool for the Assessment of Corporate Sustainability: A Case Study in the Food Machinery Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Wang, Ge & Li, Yang & Zuo, Jian & Hu, Wenbo & Nie, Qingwei & Lei, Heqian, 2021. "Who drives green innovations? Characteristics and policy implications for green building collaborative innovation networks in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Wirl, Franz, 2004. "Thresholds in concave renewable resource models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 259-267, February.
    16. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    17. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    18. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    19. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:6-:d:196420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.