IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v47y2015icp117-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New biorefineries and sustainable agriculture: Increased food, biofuels, and ecosystem security

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Hong-Ge
  • Zhang, Y.-H. Percival

Abstract

The sustainability revolution is the defining challenge of our time to meet increasing needs in the energy−food−water nexus without compromising the ability of next generations. To feed the world, modern agriculture is primarily based on annual grain crops that replace native perennial plant communities on most of the arable land on the planet. This practice may not be sustainable due to high inputs of fresh water, fertilizers, and herbicides; soil erosion; and runoff water pollution. Recent biotechnology breakthroughs enable the fractionation of nonfood lignocellulosic biomass to multiple components, the conversion of nonfood cellulose to starch without sugar loss, the production of in vitro meat without slaughtering livestock, and the production of healthy oil from microbes, suggesting great opportunities of new biorefineries based on nonfood biomass. Perennial plant communities have higher biomass yield per hectare, have easily resource management, store more carbon, maintain better water quality, utilize nutrients more efficiently, tolerate more extreme weather events, and resist pests better than annual crops. Sustainable agriculture based on annual grains and perennial high-biomass yield plants along with new biorefineries could produce a myriad of products from biofuels (e.g., butanol and hydrogen), biomaterials, to food/feed. Sustainable agriculture and new biorefineries could be cornerstones of the coming sustainability revolution based on the most abundant renewable bioresource−biomass.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Hong-Ge & Zhang, Y.-H. Percival, 2015. "New biorefineries and sustainable agriculture: Increased food, biofuels, and ecosystem security," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 117-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:47:y:2015:i:c:p:117-132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115001367
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric J. Steen & Yisheng Kang & Gregory Bokinsky & Zhihao Hu & Andreas Schirmer & Amy McClure & Stephen B. del Cardayre & Jay D. Keasling, 2010. "Microbial production of fatty-acid-derived fuels and chemicals from plant biomass," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7280), pages 559-562, January.
    2. R. D. Cortright & R. R. Davda & J. A. Dumesic, 2002. "Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6901), pages 964-967, August.
    3. Searchinger, Timothy & Heimlich, Ralph & Houghton, R. A. & Dong, Fengxia & Elobeid, Amani & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Tokgoz, Simla & Hayes, Dermot J. & Yu, Hun-Hsiang, 2008. "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12881, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Shota Atsumi & Taizo Hanai & James C. Liao, 2008. "Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7174), pages 86-89, January.
    5. Kuhad, Ramesh Chander & Gupta, Rishi & Khasa, Yogender Pal & Singh, Ajay & Zhang, Y.-H. Percival, 2011. "Bioethanol production from pentose sugars: Current status and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4950-4962.
    6. Keith O. Fuglie & Sun Ling Wang, 2013. "New Evidence Points to Robust but Uneven Productivity Growth in Global Agriculture," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 5(1), pages 23-30, January.
    7. Jonathan A. Foley & Navin Ramankutty & Kate A. Brauman & Emily S. Cassidy & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Christine O’Connell & Deepak K. Ray & Paul C. West & Christian Balz, 2011. "Solutions for a cultivated planet," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7369), pages 337-342, October.
    8. Pamela P. Peralta-Yahya & Fuzhong Zhang & Stephen B. del Cardayre & Jay D. Keasling, 2012. "Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7411), pages 320-328, August.
    9. Lee R. Lynd & Jeremy Woods, 2011. "Perspective: A new hope for Africa," Nature, Nature, vol. 474(7352), pages 20-21, June.
    10. Vaclav Smil, 2010. "Energy Myths and Realities: Bringing Science to the Energy Policy Debate," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 50339, September.
    11. Paul H. Opgenorth & Tyler P. Korman & James U. Bowie, 2014. "A synthetic biochemistry molecular purge valve module that maintains redox balance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, September.
    12. Patricio Grassini & Kent M. Eskridge & Kenneth G. Cassman, 2013. "Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Shibao & Zhang, Xiaoling & Peng, Huarong & Skitmore, Martin & Bai, Xiao & Zheng, Zhihong, 2021. "The energy-food-water nexus: Water footprint of Henan-Hubei-Hunan in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Lelde Timma & Elina Dace & Troels Kristensen & Marie Trydeman Knudsen, 2020. "Dynamic Sustainability Assessment Tool: Case Study of Green Biorefineries in Danish Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Chojnacka, K. & Witek-Krowiak, A. & Moustakas, K. & Skrzypczak, D. & Mikula, K. & Loizidou, M., 2020. "A transition from conventional irrigation to fertigation with reclaimed wastewater: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Ahmad, Farah B. & Zhang, Zhanying & Doherty, William O.S. & O'Hara, Ian M., 2019. "The outlook of the production of advanced fuels and chemicals from integrated oil palm biomass biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 386-411.
    5. Małgorzata Gawlik-Kobylińska, 2021. "Can Security and Safety Education Support Sustainability? Lessons Learned from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Budzianowski, Wojciech M. & Postawa, Karol, 2016. "Total Chain Integration of sustainable biorefinery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1432-1446.
    8. Muthukrishnan, Ranjan & West, Natalie M. & Davis, Adam S. & Jordan, Nicholas R. & Forester, James D., 2015. "Evaluating the role of landscape in the spread of invasive species: The case of the biomass crop Miscanthus×giganteus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 317(C), pages 6-15.
    9. Yang, Zhi & Kong, Tingting & Xie, Jiarui & Yang, Taiguo & Jiang, Yu & Feng, Ziqi & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "Appropriate water and fertilizer supply can increase yield by promoting growth while ensuring the soil ecological environment in melon production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    10. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.
    11. Räty, Niko & Tuomisto, Hanna L. & Ryynänen, Toni, 2023. "On what basis is it agriculture?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Ahmad Hamidov & Katharina Helming, 2020. "Sustainability Considerations in Water–Energy–Food Nexus Research in Irrigated Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    14. Schlör, Holger & Märker, Carolin & Venghaus, Sandra, 2021. "Developing a nexus systems thinking test –A qualitative multi- and mixed methods analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part I," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1427-1445.
    2. Sadhukhan, Jhuma & Lloyd, Jon R. & Scott, Keith & Premier, Giuliano C. & Yu, Eileen H. & Curtis, Tom & Head, Ian M., 2016. "A critical review of integration analysis of microbial electrosynthesis (MES) systems with waste biorefineries for the production of biofuel and chemical from reuse of CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 116-132.
    3. Khoo, Hsien H., 2015. "Review of bio-conversion pathways of lignocellulose-to-ethanol: Sustainability assessment based on land footprint projections," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 100-119.
    4. Deepayan Debnath & Madhu Khanna & Deepak Rajagopal & David Zilberman, 2019. "The Future of Biofuels in an Electrifying Global Transportation Sector: Imperative, Prospects and Challenges," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 563-582, December.
    5. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1446-1466.
    6. Ji, Xi & Long, Xianling, 2016. "A review of the ecological and socioeconomic effects of biofuel and energy policy recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 41-52.
    7. Gao, Yukun & Zhao, Hongfang & Zhao, Chuang & Hu, Guohua & Zhang, Han & Liu, Xue & Li, Nan & Hou, Haiyan & Li, Xia, 2022. "Spatial and temporal variations of maize and wheat yield gaps and their relationships with climate in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Khatun, Rahima & Reza, Mohammad Imam Hasan & Moniruzzaman, M. & Yaakob, Zahira, 2017. "Sustainable oil palm industry: The possibilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 608-619.
    9. Matteo Coronese & Martina Occelli & Francesco Lamperti & Andrea Roventini, 2024. "Towards sustainable agriculture: behaviors, spatial dynamics and policy in an evolutionary agent-based model," LEM Papers Series 2024/05, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Wen, Pei-Ling & Lin, Jin-Xu & Lin, Shih-Mo & Feng, Chun-Chiang & Ko, Fu-Kuang, 2015. "Optimal production of cellulosic ethanol from Taiwan's agricultural waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 294-304.
    11. Ulugbek Azimov & Victor Okoro & Hector H. Hernandez, 2021. "Recent Progress and Trends in the Development of Microbial Biofuels from Solid Waste—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Siegmeier, Torsten & Möller, Detlev, 2013. "Mapping research at the intersection of organic farming and bioenergy — A scientometric review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 197-204.
    13. Baldos, Uris Lantz & Thomas Hertel, 2014. "Bursting the Bubble: A Long Run Perspective on Crop Commodity Prices," GTAP Working Papers 4574, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    14. Wang, Wei-Cheng & Tao, Ling, 2016. "Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 801-822.
    15. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Xian & Chen, Haibin & Niu, Wenhao & Kong, Xiangbin & Yu, Qiang & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Identifying opportunities to close yield gaps in China by use of certificated cultivars to estimate potential productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Nanda, Sonil & Azargohar, Ramin & Dalai, Ajay K. & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2015. "An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 925-941.
    17. Enrico Balugani & Beike Sumfleth & Stefan Majer & Diego Marazza & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "Bridging Modeling and Certification to Evaluate Low-ILUC-Risk Practices for Biobased Materials with a User-Friendly Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Acheampong, Michael & Ertem, Funda Cansu & Kappler, Benjamin & Neubauer, Peter, 2017. "In pursuit of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 7: Will biofuels be reliable?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 927-937.
    19. Das, Manali & Patra, Pradipta & Ghosh, Amit, 2020. "Metabolic engineering for enhancing microbial biosynthesis of advanced biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Oliveira, Gustavo de L.T. & McKay, Ben & Plank, Christina, 2017. "How biofuel policies backfire: Misguided goals, inefficient mechanisms, and political-ecological blind spots," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 765-775.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:47:y:2015:i:c:p:117-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.