IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v200y2024ics1364032124003137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decarbonization strategies in the maritime industry: An analysis of dual-fuel engine performance and the carbon intensity indicator

Author

Listed:
  • Ejder, Emir
  • Dinçer, Samet
  • Arslanoglu, Yasin

Abstract

This study is based on detailed data from 11 sea voyages over three years to determine the impact of liquefied natural gas (LNG) use on the decarbonization pathway in maritime transportation. The research detailed the vessel's daily fuel consumption, CO2 emission inventories, and Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII). The decision tree method used to evaluate this complex dataset highlights the possible contributions of LNG to maritime energy efficiency and sustainability. While the findings show that LNG reduces CO2 emissions by around 30 %, it is insufficient to meet the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) 2050 targets. The study concludes that LNG should be an important transition fuel until the mid-2030s. However, the maritime sector needs multi-pronged strategies such as technological innovations, stringent regulations and sectoral collaborations to achieve a decarbonized future. This research provides a comprehensive analysis assessing the potential of LNG to achieve the IMO 2050 targets in the context of maritime decarbonization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ejder, Emir & Dinçer, Samet & Arslanoglu, Yasin, 2024. "Decarbonization strategies in the maritime industry: An analysis of dual-fuel engine performance and the carbon intensity indicator," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124003137
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124003137
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124003137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.