IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v180y2021icp232-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of charcoal production and electricity generation from eucalyptus in an industrial batch kiln

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente Leme, Marcio Montagnana
  • Venturini, Osvaldo José
  • Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo
  • de Almeida, Wellington
  • Rocha, Mateus Henrique
  • Andrade da Cunha Dias, Tomás
  • del Olmo, Oscar Almazán

Abstract

Brazilian charcoal is produced from planted eucalyptus forest wood in traditional batch reactors. The ordinary technology applied in Brazil does not use pyrolysis waste gases, which leads to the loss of 30% of wood energy and decreases air quality. This study evaluated the synchronous use of industrial batch kilns, waste gas burning, and energy recovery to produce electricity. Three scenarios were analyzed: (S1) Eucalyptus charcoal production without gas burning (Base Scenario); (S2) with gas burning; and (S3) with gas burning and electricity generation. Since a eucalyptus forest can fix carbon into its biomass through photosynthesis and finally into charcoal, S1 was able to reduce 3402.5 kg of CO2-eq per Mg of charcoal produced, and S2 reduced 6453.1 kg of CO2-eq due to waste gas methane burning. Electricity production is environmentally positive for all evaluated environmental indicators thanks to gas pollutants destruction and renewable energy generation. For S1, a ratio difference of 6.3 was found between the output of renewable energy and fossil energy input during the charcoal life cycle. For a combined production of charcoal and electricity (S3), a ratio difference of 6.9 was found. Photochemical oxidation was the main impact which can be significantly reduced by adopting gas flaring.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente Leme, Marcio Montagnana & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & de Almeida, Wellington & Rocha, Mateus Henrique & Andrade da Cunha Dias, Tomás & del Olmo, Oscar Almazán, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of charcoal production and electricity generation from eucalyptus in an industrial batch kiln," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 232-244.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:180:y:2021:i:c:p:232-244
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121012003
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sueli De Fátima de Oliveira Miranda Santos & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Cássia Maria Lie Ugaya & Danilo Barros Donato & Aldo Braghini Júnior & Antonio Carlos De Francisco & Ana Márcia Macedo Ladeira Ca, 2017. "Life Cycle Analysis of Charcoal Production in Masonry Kilns with and without Carbonization Process Generated Gas Combustion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Riva, Lorenzo & Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed & Skreiberg, Øyvind & Wang, Liang & Bartocci, Pietro & Barbanera, Marco & Bidini, Gianni & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2019. "Analysis of optimal temperature, pressure and binder quantity for the production of biocarbon pellet to be used as a substitute for coke," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Pereira, Emanuele Graciosa & Martins, Márcio Arêdes & Pecenka, Ralf & Carneiro, Angélica de Cássia O., 2017. "Pyrolysis gases burners: Sustainability for integrated production of charcoal, heat and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 592-600.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng, Fan & Rong, Guoqiang & Zhao, Ruiji & Chen, Bo & Xu, Xiaoyun & Qiu, Hao & Cao, Xinde & Zhao, Ling, 2024. "Incorporating biochar into fuels system of iron and steel industry: carbon emission reduction potential and economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ras Izzati Ismail & Chu Yee Khor & Alina Rahayu Mohamed, 2023. "Pelletization Temperature and Pressure Effects on the Mechanical Properties of Khaya senegalensis Biomass Energy Pellets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Dan Liu & Da Teng & Yan Zhu & Xingde Wang & Hanyang Wang, 2023. "Optimization of Process Parameters for Pellet Production from Corn Stalk Rinds Using Box–Behnken Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Carvalho, Ricardo L. & Lindgren, Robert & García-López, Natxo & Nyambane, Anne & Nyberg, Gert & Diaz-Chavez, Rocio & Boman, Christoffer, 2019. "Household air pollution mitigation with integrated biomass/cookstove strategies in Western Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-186.
    4. Yu-Chiao Lu & Liviu Brabie & Andrey V. Karasev & Chuan Wang, 2022. "Applications of Hydrochar and Charcoal in the Iron and Steelmaking Industry—Part 2: Carburization of Liquid Iron by Addition of Iron–Carbon Briquettes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Qing & Gul, Eid & Shi, Mengmeng & Li, Jiashuo & Yang, Minjiao & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Bin & Zhao, Haibo & Yan, Yunjun & Erdoğan, Güneş & Bartocci, Pietro & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2021. "Decarbonizing university campuses through the production of biogas from food waste: An LCA analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 565-578.
    6. Wioletta Żukiewicz-Sobczak & Agnieszka Latawiec & Paweł Sobczak & Bernardo Strassburg & Dorota Plewik & Małgorzata Tokarska-Rodak, 2020. "Biochars Originating from Different Biomass and Pyrolysis Process Reveal to Have Different Microbial Characterization: Implications for Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Antonio Carlos De Francisco, 2018. "Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation in Brazil: An Analysis of the 2016–2026 Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Rodrigues, Thaisa & Braghini Junior, Aldo, 2019. "Technological prospecting in the production of charcoal: A patent study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 170-183.
    9. Surup, Gerrit Ralf & Hunt, Andrew J. & Attard, Thomas & Budarin, Vitaliy L. & Forsberg, Fredrik & Arshadi, Mehrdad & Abdelsayed, Victor & Shekhawat, Dushyant & Trubetskaya, Anna, 2020. "The effect of wood composition and supercritical CO2 extraction on charcoal production in ferroalloy industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Cesare Caputo & Ondřej Mašek, 2021. "SPEAR (Solar Pyrolysis Energy Access Reactor): Theoretical Design and Evaluation of a Small-Scale Low-Cost Pyrolysis Unit for Implementation in Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Marcin Bielecki & Valentina Zubkova & Andrzej Strojwas, 2022. "Influence of Densification on the Pyrolytic Behavior of Agricultural Biomass Waste and the Characteristics of Pyrolysis Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. de Paula Protásio, Thiago & Roque Lima, Michael Douglas & Scatolino, Mário Vanoli & Silva, Alanna Barishinikov & Rodrigues de Figueiredo, Izabel Cristina & Gherardi Hein, Paulo Ricardo & Trugilho, Pau, 2021. "Charcoal productivity and quality parameters for reliable classification of Eucalyptus clones from Brazilian energy forests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 34-45.
    13. Mohammed Salah Nasr & Awham Jumah Salman & Rusul Jaber Ghayyib & Ali Shubbar & Shahad Al-Mamoori & Zainab Al-khafaji & Tameem Mohammed Hashim & Zaid Ali Hasan & Monower Sadique, 2023. "Effect of Clay Brick Waste Powder on the Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete: State-of-the-Art and Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Carvalho, Pollyana R. & Medeiros, Samuel L.S. & Paixão, Raul L. & Figueredo, Igor M. & Mattos, Adriano L.A. & Rios, M. Alexsandra S., 2023. "Thermogravimetric pyrolysis of residual biomasses obtained post-extraction of carnauba wax: Determination of kinetic parameters using Friedman's isoconversional method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 703-713.
    15. Felix Charvet & Arlindo Matos & José Figueiredo da Silva & Luís Tarelho & Mariana Leite & Daniel Neves, 2022. "Charcoal Production in Portugal: Operating Conditions and Performance of a Traditional Brick Kiln," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Anukam, Anthony & Berghel, Jonas & Henrikson, Gunnar & Frodeson, Stefan & Ståhl, Magnus, 2021. "A review of the mechanism of bonding in densified biomass pellets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Surup, Gerrit Ralf & Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed & Großarth, Marius & Deike, Rüdiger & Van den Bulcke, Jan & Kibleur, Pierre & Müller, Michael & Ziegner, Mirko & Yazhenskikh, Elena & Beloshapkin, Sergey & , 2020. "Effect of operating conditions and feedstock composition on the properties of manganese oxide or quartz charcoal pellets for the use in ferroalloy industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Coelho, Suani Teixeira & Sanches-Pereira, Alessandro & Tudeschini, Luís Gustavo & Goldemberg, José, 2018. "The energy transition history of fuelwood replacement for liquefied petroleum gas in Brazilian households from 1920 to 2016," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 41-52.
    19. Andrzej Kuranc & Monika Stoma & Leszek Rydzak & Monika Pilipiuk, 2020. "Durability Assessment of Wooden Pellets in Relation with Vibrations Occurring in a Logistic Process of the Final Product," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Ya Chen & Xiaoli Fan & Qian Zhou, 2020. "An Inverted-U Impact of Environmental Regulations on Carbon Emissions in China’s Iron and Steel Industry: Mechanisms of Synergy and Innovation Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:180:y:2021:i:c:p:232-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.