IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v356y2024ics0306261923017415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating biochar into fuels system of iron and steel industry: carbon emission reduction potential and economic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Meng, Fan
  • Rong, Guoqiang
  • Zhao, Ruiji
  • Chen, Bo
  • Xu, Xiaoyun
  • Qiu, Hao
  • Cao, Xinde
  • Zhao, Ling

Abstract

Biochar as a prospective renewable energy candidate could be incorporated into the iron and steel production system to replace part of fossil fuels and reduce high-intensity greenhouse gas emissions. However, great uncertainties still exist on biochar's emission reduction capacity and economic feasibility, depending on different biochar precursors, substitution scenarios, energy consumption of biochar production and financial cost. This study aimed to explore the optimized substitution strategies concerning the above issues. A systematic carbon accounting was performed by material flow analysis method (MFA). Two biochar incorporated iron and steel production routes, integrated production route (BF-BOF) and short production route (EAF), which took the proportion of 71.5% and 28.2% in worldwide production, were considered. CO2 Supply Curve (CSC) was conducted to carry out a quantitative economic viability analysis of biochar substitution under carbon emission trading schemes (ETS). Results showed that compared with straw-based biochar, wood-based biochar showed stronger carbon reduction capacity of 1.47 t CO2e (CO2-equivalent) /t crude steel, and the reduction potential reached 66.94% mostly. Among all the steel production processes, Blast furnace in BF-BOF route had the largest emission contribution proportion (72.06%), achieving the best GWP100 reduction potential of 73.66%. The incorporation of wood-based biochar in sintering (−0.037 yuan/t CO2e) was selected as the scenario with both reduction potential and economic viability. If the scenario was fully implemented in China, it could reduce 2.01 million tons of CO2e in 2021. This study would play a vital role in guiding iron and steel industry for biochar substituted fuels.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng, Fan & Rong, Guoqiang & Zhao, Ruiji & Chen, Bo & Xu, Xiaoyun & Qiu, Hao & Cao, Xinde & Zhao, Ling, 2024. "Incorporating biochar into fuels system of iron and steel industry: carbon emission reduction potential and economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017415
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923017415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pinto, Raphael Guimarães D. & Szklo, Alexandre S. & Rathmann, Regis, 2018. "CO2 emissions mitigation strategy in the Brazilian iron and steel sector–From structural to intensity effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 380-393.
    2. Meier, Alan & Rosenfeld, Arthur H. & Wright, Janice, 1982. "Supply curves of conserved energy for California's residential sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 347-358.
    3. Vicente Leme, Marcio Montagnana & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & de Almeida, Wellington & Rocha, Mateus Henrique & Andrade da Cunha Dias, Tomás & del Olmo, Oscar Almazán, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of charcoal production and electricity generation from eucalyptus in an industrial batch kiln," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 232-244.
    4. Mousa, Elsayed & Wang, Chuan & Riesbeck, Johan & Larsson, Mikael, 2016. "Biomass applications in iron and steel industry: An overview of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1247-1266.
    5. Al Afif, Rafat & Anayah, S. Sean & Pfeifer, Christoph, 2020. "Batch pyrolysis of cotton stalks for evaluation of biochar energy potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2250-2258.
    6. Wu, Junnian & Wang, Ruiqi & Pu, Guangying & Qi, Hang, 2016. "Integrated assessment of exergy, energy and carbon dioxide emissions in an iron and steel industrial network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 430-444.
    7. Hasanbeigi, Ali & Menke, Christoph & Therdyothin, Apichit, 2010. "The use of conservation supply curves in energy policy and economic analysis: The case study of Thai cement industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 392-405, January.
    8. Li, Yuan & Zhu, Lei, 2014. "Cost of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction in China’s iron and steel sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 603-616.
    9. Zhang, Zhiwei & Hong, Suk-Hoon & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2023. "Role and impact of wash columns on the performance of chemical absorption-based CO2 capture process for blast furnace gas in iron and steel industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    10. Nwachukwu, Chinedu Maureen & Wang, Chuan & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2021. "Exploring the role of forest biomass in abating fossil CO2 emissions in the iron and steel industry – The case of Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    11. Juntueng, Sirintip & Towprayoon, Sirintornthep & Chiarakorn, Siriluk, 2014. "Energy and carbon dioxide intensity of Thailand's steel industry and greenhouse gas emission projection toward the year 2050," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 46-56.
    12. Sicong Tian & Jianguo Jiang & Zuotai Zhang & Vasilije Manovic, 2018. "Inherent potential of steelmaking to contribute to decarbonisation targets via industrial carbon capture and storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Zhang, Hanxin & Sun, Wenqiang & Li, Weidong & Ma, Guangyu, 2022. "A carbon flow tracing and carbon accounting method for exploring CO2 emissions of the iron and steel industry: An integrated material–energy–carbon hub," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    14. Lovcha, Yuliya & Perez-Laborda, Alejandro & Sikora, Iryna, 2022. "The determinants of CO2 prices in the EU emission trading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    15. Rodrigues, Thaisa & Braghini Junior, Aldo, 2019. "Technological prospecting in the production of charcoal: A patent study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 170-183.
    16. Yang, Qiushuang & Mašek, Ondřej & Zhao, Ling & Nan, Hongyan & Yu, Shitong & Yin, Jianxiang & Li, Zhaopeng & Cao, Xinde, 2021. "Country-level potential of carbon sequestration and environmental benefits by utilizing crop residues for biochar implementation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    17. Hammond, Jim & Shackley, Simon & Sohi, Saran & Brownsort, Peter, 2011. "Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2646-2655, May.
    18. Stefano F. Verde, 2020. "The Impact Of The Eu Emissions Trading System On Competitiveness And Carbon Leakage: The Econometric Evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 320-343, April.
    19. Laura J. Sonter & Damian J. Barrett & Chris J. Moran & Britaldo S. Soares-Filho, 2015. "Carbon emissions due to deforestation for the production of charcoal used in Brazil’s steel industry," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 359-363, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suad Al Hosni & Marta Domini & Reza Vahidzadeh & Giorgio Bertanza, 2024. "Potential and Environmental Benefits of Biochar Utilization for Coal/Coke Substitution in the Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Chamin Geng & Zhuoyue Shi & Xianhao Chen & Ziwen Sun & Yawei Jin & Tian Shi & Xiao Wu, 2024. "Stochastic Capacity Optimization of an Integrated BFGCC–MSHS–Wind–Solar Energy System for the Decarbonization of a Steelmaking Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli & Colmenero, João Carlos & Aragão, Franciely Velozo & Rodrigues, Thaisa & Junior, Aldo Braghini, 2020. "Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Andersson, Elias & Karlsson, Magnus & Thollander, Patrik & Paramonova, Svetlana, 2018. "Energy end-use and efficiency potentials among Swedish industrial small and medium-sized enterprises – A dataset analysis from the national energy audit program," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 165-177.
    3. Marcin Sajdak & Roksana Muzyka & Grzegorz Gałko & Ewelina Ksepko & Monika Zajemska & Szymon Sobek & Dariusz Tercki, 2022. "Actual Trends in the Usability of Biochar as a High-Value Product of Biomass Obtained through Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-30, December.
    4. Rodrigues da Silva, Rafael & Mathias, Flavio Roberto de Carvalho & Bajay, Sergio Valdir, 2018. "Potential energy efficiency improvements for the Brazilian iron and steel industry: Fuel and electricity conservation supply curves for integrated steel mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 816-824.
    5. Chen, Demin & Li, Jiaqi & Wang, Zhao & Lu, Biao & Chen, Guang, 2022. "Hierarchical model to find the path reducing CO2 emissions of integrated iron and steel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Wang, Ke & Wang, Shanshan & Liu, Lei & Yue, Hui & Zhang, Ruiqin & Tang, Xiaoyan, 2016. "Environmental co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in coal-fired power sector: A case study of Henan Province, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 810-819.
    7. Zheng, Qingying & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Achieving energy conservation targets in a more cost-effective way: Case study of pulp and paper industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2021. "A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Andrade, Carlos & Desport, Lucas & Selosse, Sandrine, 2024. "Net-negative emission opportunities for the iron and steel industry on a global scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    10. Wang, Can & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Gao, Xue & Berrill, Peter, 2017. "Unexpected water impacts of energy-saving measures in the iron and steel sector: Tradeoffs or synergies?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1119-1127.
    11. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Che, Zichang & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & Li, Yingnan & Du, Tao & Song, Yanli & Fang, Xin, 2022. "Cost-benefit assessment of manufacturing system using comprehensive value flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    12. Chen, Qianqian & Gu, Yu & Tang, Zhiyong & Wei, Wei & Sun, Yuhan, 2018. "Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 192-207.
    13. Harvey, L.D. Danny, 2024. "A bottom-up assessment of recent (2016–20) energy use by the global iron and steel industry constrained to match a top-down (International Energy Agency) assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    14. Hasanbeigi, Ali & Morrow, William & Sathaye, Jayant & Masanet, Eric & Xu, Tengfang, 2013. "A bottom-up model to estimate the energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 315-325.
    15. Li, Feng & Chu, Mansheng & Tang, Jue & Liu, Zhenggen & Guo, Jun & Yan, Ruijun & Liu, Peijun, 2022. "Thermodynamic performance analysis and environmental impact assessment of an integrated system for hydrogen generation and steelmaking," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Chen, Hao & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liao, Hua & Tang, Bao-Jun & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Costs and potentials of energy conservation in China's coal-fired power industry: A bottom-up approach considering price uncertainties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 23-32.
    17. Gang Du & Chuanwang Sun, 2015. "Determinants of Electricity Demand in Nonmetallic Mineral Products Industry: Evidence from a Comparative Study of Japan and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Lin-Ju Chen & Zhen-Hai Fang & Fei Xie & Hai-Kuo Dong & Yu-Heng Zhou, 2020. "Technology-side carbon abatement cost curves for China’s power generation sector," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1305-1323, October.
    19. Anand, Abhijeet & Kumar, Vivek & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Biochar and its twin benefits: Crop residue management and climate change mitigation in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Wang, R.Q. & Jiang, L. & Wang, Y.D. & Font-Palma, C. & Skoulou, V. & Roskilly, A.P., 2024. "Woody biomass waste derivatives in decarbonised blast furnace ironmaking process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.